Quick Answers for Hard Questions About Christ
What's Not Enough Part 2: Where Doesn't Apologetics Fit?
I knew a guy in school once who was a self-avowed atheist. He was a nice guy, and we got along quite well. One day he found me reading from the Bible in the library. "So…" he smiled, "you're a Christian?" "Yep!" I blurted, overcompensating for my nervous timidity. I knew something was coming. "So, you think, then, that if there is a little kid in India who has never heard of Christ and has never seen a Bible and he suddenly dies, he is going to hell?" I was speechless. He walked away.
I have thought about that encounter a lot since high school. There was nothing more he said to me that day. He was even gracious enough to let me off the hook when I didn't have an answer. Yet, I was infuriated by his "arrogance". I thought long and hard about a comeback for his dilemma, but to no avail. Instead, I avoided him like the plague while harboring "righteous indignation".
Six years later I graduated from college with a degree in philosophy. I had an arsenal of rebuttals to his comment. I could have used the ontological, teleological, cosmological or moral arguments to prove God's existence. I could have explained the benefits of free will in humanity and the unfortunate consequences it necessitated. I could have explained Paul's concept from Romans of even the ignorant having knowledge of God. I could have bashed his argument to death; I could have crushed him like an enemy, under a booted heal; I could have wooed the whole school with my knowledge and heavenly authority. But the more I think about it, I also could have alienated him from the truth of Jesus Christ and left myself empty and doubting.
There are very few people who come to know God through intellectual arguments. Arguments mostly give theists a nice, warm, fuzzy feeling. I am not saying there is no use to them, but the arguments weren't even good enough for me. After years of revisiting the dilemma, I beat it down with explanations, while the force of the question remained. It wasn't until I really thought about what bothered me that I began to understand.
By pointing to the Indian boy in hell, my friend was forcing me to admit that, if God exists, he is unjust. Since nobody wants to believe in an unjust God, the scary conclusion was that he doesn't exist. I was amazed at how a simple question could uproot my entire faith so quickly. But then I realized something. God doesn't tell us what he is going to do with the Indian boy. I already believe he is good. So why should I believe he is going to hell? And even if he is, why should I believe God is unjust for it? If I really believed God was good, and an Indian boy went to hell, there must be a good reason for it-greater than I could understand.
The real question is, "What about my friend?" He had heard of Christ and had seen a Bible. Did he even consider Christianity a viable option? Would arguments help him at all? I am convinced they would not. I am also convinced that my "righteous indignation" was rooted in my own faith struggles and that his "arrogance" was rooted in my own feelings of inadequacy.
If I could go back, I wouldn't offer any arguments, even though there are plenty out there. Instead I would tell him that his question doesn't have a bearing on my faith, because I already believe God is good. I would tell him that I trusted the Indian boy to God's hand more than mine. Then I would ask him why he didn't believe in God. I would listen. I would respect him. And I would try to paint the most beautiful picture of Christ for him that my weak and depraved mind could paint. Then at least his decision would be based on Christ and not me.
I have thought about that encounter a lot since high school. There was nothing more he said to me that day. He was even gracious enough to let me off the hook when I didn't have an answer. Yet, I was infuriated by his "arrogance". I thought long and hard about a comeback for his dilemma, but to no avail. Instead, I avoided him like the plague while harboring "righteous indignation".
Six years later I graduated from college with a degree in philosophy. I had an arsenal of rebuttals to his comment. I could have used the ontological, teleological, cosmological or moral arguments to prove God's existence. I could have explained the benefits of free will in humanity and the unfortunate consequences it necessitated. I could have explained Paul's concept from Romans of even the ignorant having knowledge of God. I could have bashed his argument to death; I could have crushed him like an enemy, under a booted heal; I could have wooed the whole school with my knowledge and heavenly authority. But the more I think about it, I also could have alienated him from the truth of Jesus Christ and left myself empty and doubting.
There are very few people who come to know God through intellectual arguments. Arguments mostly give theists a nice, warm, fuzzy feeling. I am not saying there is no use to them, but the arguments weren't even good enough for me. After years of revisiting the dilemma, I beat it down with explanations, while the force of the question remained. It wasn't until I really thought about what bothered me that I began to understand.
By pointing to the Indian boy in hell, my friend was forcing me to admit that, if God exists, he is unjust. Since nobody wants to believe in an unjust God, the scary conclusion was that he doesn't exist. I was amazed at how a simple question could uproot my entire faith so quickly. But then I realized something. God doesn't tell us what he is going to do with the Indian boy. I already believe he is good. So why should I believe he is going to hell? And even if he is, why should I believe God is unjust for it? If I really believed God was good, and an Indian boy went to hell, there must be a good reason for it-greater than I could understand.
The real question is, "What about my friend?" He had heard of Christ and had seen a Bible. Did he even consider Christianity a viable option? Would arguments help him at all? I am convinced they would not. I am also convinced that my "righteous indignation" was rooted in my own faith struggles and that his "arrogance" was rooted in my own feelings of inadequacy.
If I could go back, I wouldn't offer any arguments, even though there are plenty out there. Instead I would tell him that his question doesn't have a bearing on my faith, because I already believe God is good. I would tell him that I trusted the Indian boy to God's hand more than mine. Then I would ask him why he didn't believe in God. I would listen. I would respect him. And I would try to paint the most beautiful picture of Christ for him that my weak and depraved mind could paint. Then at least his decision would be based on Christ and not me.
Published by Nicolas Frank
My dad was a youth pastor in a Baptist church.I am still protestant.At age 20 I married (Penni), just had a baby 5/05.I have a BA in philosophy.I like read existentialists and pragmatists, am deliberately po... View profile
God Friends and My Church FamilyHow I find God and where.- Is There a God?A question that man has been asking for hundreds if not thousands of years. Is there a God?
- AskMeNow: Let Your Cell Phone Ask Questions for YouAs an on the go individual, there are times that I need answers to questions quickly. Instead of wasting valuable time, I can go to a professional that will always know the answers to my questions.
Top Ten Gift Ideas for Christian Teenagers - Cheap!What do you get for the Christian teenager, without breaking the bank? Here, the top ten cheap gift ideas for the young church-going set.- Top Tarot Tips for TeensTarot can be intimidating but with these tips and ideas, you'll be reading the Tarot cards in no time at all. Answers to your questions can be fast, easy and fun.
- Top 10 Christian AC Content of 2006
- Websites to Find Surveys for MySpace
- Abortion and Child Support: Equal Rights for Men
- The Gift of the Fear of God
- How to Prepare for Breast Augmentation Surgery
- Advice for Singles in Career Transition:
- More Important Law of Attraction Questions and Answers
- It's more important to give a loving answer than a good one.
- Comebacks help least of all the ones giving them.


6 Comments
Post a CommentI beg in the name of Jesus Christ please kindly send me a package of bibles and tracts for my Sunday school children.
I believe baptising and infant is not good because jesus said they are pure already before God, because he told us to be like children for us to have eternal life. But as for adults it is very vital to be baptised, because Jesus said to Nicodemus unless a man is born again of water and the spirit he can not enter the Kingdom of God. And the other thing too is that Jesus said "Go ye into the world and preach the Gospel and whoever beliveth and be BAPTISED shall be SAVED". So without baptism it is very hard to stand before God because every man and women should be BAPTISED.
Very thought-provoking article. As a Christ-follower, I have no concern whatsoever for those who "have never heard" or even for those who have heard, but have thus far in their lives rejected Christ. You see, Christ came to save the whole world -- every man, woman, and child. His sacrifice was sufficient to accomplish that. And I have no doubt He will save everyone in His own time, in His own way, and without the need of my understanding or approval. God Bless!
Sorry for error in my recent posting, should be...(read all scriptures, Bible too, free at www.lds.org (not lds.com)
From a biblical event [Matthew 23:13-33] we learn clearly that mere baptism avails a man nothing except that baptism is preceded by true repentance and good works. Jesus blessed little children and told onlookers that except a man becomes as a little child�easy to love, sweet, kind, un-condemning, forgiving, not mean spirited, etc.�he cannot enter the kingdom of God! [Matt. 18:1-6, 10] Is there any biblical instance of baptizing any infant or child? Of course not. Scriptural truth leads us to realize that those who did not have opportunity to understand Christ�s gospel sufficiently while living on earth may receive that opportunity after their death, in the spirit world of Paradise. [see Luke 23:39-43; 1 Peter 3:18-20 and 4:6] Valued insight on unbaptized infants and children who have died without baptism is found in ancient America scripture: Book of Mormon, Moroni 6:1-4 and 8:8-26 (read all scriptures, Bible too, free at www.lds.com) Your brother in our Lord and Savior.
RE: �Quick answers to hard questions.� Surely it is good to have faith sufficient to instill confidence that the India boy having no opportunity to hear Christ�s gospel would still be in the hands of a loving just God at the time of his death. I am sure most Christians mature in their faith and long familiar with Christ�s biblical teachings would also support this view. This, in spite of a shocking old manmade doctrine (a doctrine I do not find biblical except when taken out of context) which most Christian churches continue to teach, namely, that without baptism the boy is doomed to eternal damnation, and must be sent to hell. You may recall that John the Baptist refused to baptize the arrogant�yes, actually unrepentant evil minded Pharisees and Sadducees who thought to also receive their baptisms from him, explaining to them that they must first bring fruits (evidence) of repentance and good works (good fruit) before they could receive John�s true baptism of ordained authority [se