The FCC determines what is appropriate to broadcast at certain times of the day. While it is not allowed to hinder free speech, obscene speech has never had protection, the FCC can put some restrictions on indecent speech. This means that between the hours of 6 a.m and 10 p.m., radio stations cannot broadcast any indecent material; however, they can broadcast indecent material and profane language between 10 p.m. to 6 a.m.-this time period is known as the "Safe Harbor."
Obscene Speech
For speech to be considered obscene, it must pass a three-prong test. First, "the average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find the material to appeal to a prurient interest." Second, "the material must depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law." Third, the material as a whole "must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
Indecent Speech
Speech is considered indecent "if, in context, it depicts or describes sexual or excretory organs or activities in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards." However, indecent speech is determined on a case-by-case basis.
Material is considered to be patently offensive if "the description is explicit or graphic," the material "dwells on or repeats at length descriptions or depictions of sexual or excretory organs," and if "the material appears to pander or is used to titillate or shock."
Although indecent material is protected by the First Amendment, it can "be restricted to avoid its broadcast during times of the day when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience." According to the FCC, children are probably in the audience between 6 a.m. to 10 p.m.
Profane Language
Profane language encompasses "words that are so highly offensive that their mere utterance in the context presented may, in legal terms, amount to a nuisance.'"
Censored Songs on the Radio
Many songs played on the radio have had one or more words censored, at least if they were played during the hours of 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. However, not all of these censorships seem to make sense. Here is a breakdown of some censored songs and why their censorship does not necessarily make sense.
Jeremih "Birthday Sex"
The radio version of this song uses the words "birthday texts" instead of "birthday sex." However, the rest of the lyrics remain unchanged, and the rest of the lyrics include words such as "g-spot," and clear phrases about pleasuring a woman sexually. And, aside from that, "birthday texts" sounds almost exactly like "birthday sex" in the song. So why the change? If children really listen to all the lyrics of this song, does this one change really protect them? And how is this indecent? Sex is a natural part of life, and there are plenty of movies and television shows that depict much more sexual situations.
MIA "Paper Planes"
Radio stations bleep out the word "weed" in this song. But how is this indecent language? It is the name of a tangible thing, and nowadays Americans as a whole are more comfortable with the idea of weed. Massachusetts basically decriminalized possession of marijuana earlier this year, and California may be able to vote to legalize and tax weed on next year's ballot (and if passed, restrictions on weed use will be about the same as restrictions on alcohol use). And, some states have even legalized medical marijuana, and Oakland, California is making money off of taxing medical marijuana businesses. So, if the goal is to protect children from any sort of mention of substances, then shouldn't words relating to alcohol also be bleeped out? Also, there are gunshot sounds in the song, which although meant to be a statement about people making money selling military weapons and ammunition, can also be interpreted as just being violent. How does the FCC and radio stations pick and choose what is and what is not acceptable to broadcast? It seems a little random sometimes.
Sublime "Santeria"
The radio version of this song bleeps out the word "ass" after the word "punk." However, you can still hear the gist of the word "ass" so most children can probably figure out what the word is, which makes me wonder how effective this method is.
Fall Out Boy "This Ain't a Scene, It's an Arms Race"
For a while, radio stations played the whole phrase, "this ain't a scene, it's a god damn arms race." However, now radio stations bleep out the word "god." Yes, I can understand people getting upset from using the Lord's name in vain, but at the same time, why isn't the word "damn" also censored? The meaning remains the same, with or without the word "god," and when compared to other censored songs, it seems using the word "damn" in that context would also be censored.
Nirvana "Rape Me"
This very popular song is not censored at all on the radio. Yes, this is an anti-rape song about a girl telling her rapist she will survive the rape, she will overcome it, and she will get revenge. But how many children listen that closely to lyrics and interpret them? The majority of the song consists of the words, "rape me," so wouldn't this send a mixed message? Also, considering other censored songs, which one could argue that in context is not all that indecent and therefore should be played normally during regular hours, why was this song considered decent?
Chilling Effect?
The FCC gives heavy fines to stations it finds violated FCC rules. For example, in 2004, the FCC took action in 12 cases, which totaled in about $8 million in penalties. Also, now broadcast stations will be fined per each indecent utterance in a broadcast, instead of one penalty for the whole broadcast.
The FCC tries to look at every complaint within nine months of receiving the complaint, and it looks at everything on a case-by-cases basis. But do these heavy fines have a sort of chilling effect on broadcasters? Does it make them censor any words that even a small group of people may have a problem with? It's hard to say, but I do think censorship of songs on the radio seems to be inconsistent. While I do understand the need to protect children, I also do not advocate stronger censorship because I think that will produce a chilling effect and impede on free speech rights. However, I do wish I could make sense of why some songs were censored and others were not.
References:
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/oip/FAQ.html
Published by Sabrina Ricci
Sabrina Ricci is a freelance writer and current grad student at New York University. She has worked and written for a variety of publications, including Noozhawk, Santa Barbara Magazine, and Examiner.com. Sh... View profile
Will Fox's Refusal to Pay an FCC Fine Set a New Precedent for Network TV?Fox recently defying an FCC fine and going all the way to the Supreme Court may look like the ultimate in network ego out of control. But even the FCC needs to give a new look a...
What is Free About Freedom of Speech?Freedom of Speech - FCC Scrutinizing Violent TV Shows The Federal Communications Commission has asked Congress to grant the government power over the violence on television shows. The FCC has concluded that regulating TV violence is for the public's best interest.
- FCC Offended by ABC's NYPD Blue: Waits 4 Years to Fine the NetworkThe FCC loses all pretense of being a gatekeeper of the public's interest with its latest ruling.
- Are Baggy Pants Really Indecent Exposure?With a failing economy and more and more people out of work should we really be concerned with how someone wears their pants?
- The Federal Communications Commission and Censorship
- An Open (and Still Unanswered) Letter to the FCC
- Censorship Hinders Right to Free Speech: Unfair Burden of Broadcast Indecency
- Obscenity, Internet Censorship and the First Amendment
- Guide to the Most Popular Radio Stations in Binghamton, New York
- The Best Radio Stations in San Diego
- Delphi MyFi Portable XM2GO Radio Receiver: Product Review





10 Comments
Post a CommentThis is a fascinating topic!
ALL rap should be censored, IMO! And yes, it is inconsistent.
Great article. Sometimes there seems to be no rhyme or reason to what they censor or not.
Great article. I'm often frustrated by what they decide to bleep out. Especially when the song isn't promoting drug use, but the drug is bleeped out, but, later, the sex language is left in the same song. It makes absolutely no sense.
I agree- the FCC seems practically useless. I can't count the times I've had to change a radio station because the lyrics of a song I was listening to with my 12 yr old were sexually explicit. Now she is old enough to ask "what does this song mean" and I don't want to explain about how the guy is recounting his favorite blowjob, for example.
Fascinating and original, good job!
great article bringing up very important points!
Nice article!Thanks Sabrina Ricci
Interesting :)
very interesting and informative! Well done