Arguably, Nader can accomplish nothing more than give a tiny minority of voters a chance to vote their consciences, while throwing their vote away in the real contest between more war, more corporate welfare, more tax cuts for the wealthy, and less concern for the well-being of the average American citizen.
Personally, I wish the man had a chance. I have long been an advocate of replacing the ludicrously low minimum wage with a "living wage law" that mandates a subsistence level minimum for all adult American workers, based on the economic realities of their local area. I also agree whole-heartedly with Nader's stand against the influence of big money in Washington. But, let's face it. He doesn't have a chance. All his candidacy can do is pull votes away from the Democratic nominee and risk losing once again by some tiny margin to (yike!) McCain and 100 more years of war in Iraq.
I'm sure the Republicans are delighted to hear the news of Nader's decision. In fact, Associated Press Writer Hope Yen's article about the announcement includes the following quotation from Mike Huckabee with regard to his view of the Nader candidacy:
"Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, speaking shortly before Nader's announcement, said Nader's past runs have shown that he usually pulls votes from the Democratic nominee. 'So naturally, Republicans would welcome his entry into the race,'the former Arkansas governor said on CNN."
So, ask yourself this: "Who is going to line up to contribute money to Nader's campaign?" The beneficiaries of allowing Nader to once again play the role of spoiler in a Presidential election. This one's a no-brainer, and given the current political landscape one has to wonder if Nader is functioning in the real world.
I suppose one could speculate endlessly on why Nader would choose to provide the Republicans with this boon, but the bottom line is that responsible, realistic voters need to treat this candidacy as little more than a personal statement by Nader, or a bad joke-depending upon one's perception of Nader and his ideals. As things stand in the real world, a vote for Nader is a vote for McCain and that's the reality.
http://www.votenader.org/blog/2008/02/24/civics-test/ this is the living wage pic
http://www.votenader.org/blog/2008/02/23/mr-frugal/
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/24/nader-to-run-again/
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jRe7-1GipomU41w-Gp2uGsR3P__AD8V0QJ300
Published by grampagravy
I'm a grumpy old boomer who thinks "shake well" is good advice for steak sauce, some medicines, and society View profile
- Election '08: Ralph Nader Leaps into the FrayElection 2008 just got more exciting. Infamous consumer advocate Ralph Nader announced his intention to run for President of the United States as an independent this morning on Meet the Press with Tim Russert.
Say NO to Our Friend Ralph Nader, NO to Another Republican White House I call upon each of you to do this nation a service and contact Ralph Nader's exploratory committee. Tell our friend Ralph Nader that the Democrats need every vote in order to p...- Ralph Nader Picked a Running Mate; Are You Asking Yourself so What?Matt Gonzalez joins Ralph Nader as his running mate and choice for VP
- Ralph Nader is Back for Round 3Ralph Nader is trying to stir up trouble once again by joining the presidential race.
- Ralph Nader... Really?Ralph Nader's sudden bid for the White House seems suspect and unwarranted.
- Can Ralph Nader Play the Role of Spolier in the 2008 Presidential Election?
- Ralph Nader Picks Matt Gonzalez as His Vice President Choice
- Ralph Nader to Run for President: Will Nader Play the Role of Spolier in 2008?
- Ralph Nader Documentary An Unreasonable Man on PBS December 18
- Ralph Nader is the Antichrist and Secretly a Republican: Stop His Campaign Before...
- Ralph Nader Picks Matt Gonzalez as Running Mate
- Ralph Nader Vs. Botox




1 Comments
Post a CommentThe "comments" below are clearly from some low-brow with nothing better to do. Is there some way to remove them?