Ralph Peters' angry reaction in the New York Post is understandable. President Obama, who is commander in chief of the soldiers Malik Nadal Hasan is alleged to have gunned down, was only to fit a trip down to Fort Hood for Tuesday, almost a week since the massacre. By contrast, the former commander in chief, former President Bush, was there by Saturday, visiting the wounded and bereaved.
The somewhat cold blooded attitude that President Obama has toward the troops seems to derive from the faith Malik Nadal Hasan professed, indeed shouted, as he sprayed bullets on his fellow soldiers. Ralph Peters posits a similar situation and a different reaction.
"Imagine if, instead of Fort Hood, the massacre had gone down at a mosque in Detroit - carried out by a maddened Christian or Jew. Obama would've been aboard Air Force One before the pilots had time to file a flight plan and he would've been on site before the gun smoke cleared, hugging and boo-hooing and dispensing stirring rhetoric for the evening news."
One can be forgiven for coming to the conclusion, as Ralph Peters seems to have, that Prtesident Obama seems to have a disdain for the troops. "Not a chance. It's not like they're real human beings with Ivy League degrees." Of course President Bush has two Ivy League degrees, but never lost the common touch.
President Obama's cold reaction to the slaughter of American soldiers seems to extend to policy in the War on Terror. Months after the commander in the field in Afghanistan requested reinforcements, President Obama is still dithering. And American soldiers in Afghanistan are still fighting and dying.
Why this "bloodless" attitude, as a British journalist described it? Partly it seems to be elitism. Barack Obama, the off spring of a couple of students, one from Kenya, the other from Kansas, exudes a kind of "greater than thou" air about him. What matters the deaths of soldiers, especially in battle against Islamists terrorism?
President Bush, the real aristocrat, the son himself of a President and heir to old money, felt every death in battle of a soldier as if he or she were one of his own. He still does, by all accounts.
No wonder Ralph Peters is angry. Any soldier would be if the Commander in Chief didn't bave his back.
Sources: Obama can't be bothered by Islamic terrorism, Ralph Peters, New York Post, November 8th, 2009
Americans are Starting to Miss President Bush, Mark R. Whittington, Associated Content, November 7th, 2009
Published by Mark Whittington
Mark R. Whittington is a writer residing in Houston, Texas. He is the author of The Last Moonwalker, Children of Apollo, Dark Sanction, and Nocturne. He has written numerous articles, some for the Washington... View profile
- Rev. Al Sharpton Upset Over New York Post Comic of Chimpanzee Attack; is it Really... The Rev. Al Sharpton is upset over a comic in the New York Post. Lily Allen say's she hates Perez Hilton and Perez now has posted semi-nude pictures of her on his site.
- African-American Communities Form a Petition to Ban New York Post Racist Cartoon The present New York Post cartoon has spawned a petition to be filed by many African-American online communities to remove the cartoon from its data base, and bring about an apology to the African-American community.
- Does New York Post Cartoon Compare Obama to Dead Chimpanzee? A New York Post cartoonist combines an attack on the stimulus bill and an attack by a chimpanzee with disastrous results.
- New York Post Chimp Cartoon Controversy Continues The controversy surrounding the New York Post chimp cartoon continues, with the New York Post issuing an apology and Al Sharpton claiming that he is not satisfied. A rally was held outside the Post Thursday and anothe...
-
In Promoting Ashley Dupre, New York Post Trashes Traditional Values
Ex-prostitute-cum-celebrity Ashley Dupre has recently become the darling of the New York Post. It is a supremely sad commentary on the current state of American culture.
- The New York Post Cartoon; Racist Reference to President Obama?
- New York Post Cartoon: A Tasteless Abomination
- New York Post Chimp Cartoon, Presidential Monkey Photo and Video Overview
- That New York Post Cartoon
- New York Post Cartoon Causes Offense
- The New York Post Monkey Cartoon Racist? Al Sharpton Stop Trippin'
- New York Post Cartoon: Al Sharpton Calls Monkey Cartoon Racist
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
4 Comments
Post a CommentMark%252C you are so full of shit... It would have been nice if you said all these wonderful things about Bush and his puppeteer %2528Chaney%2529when they started the Iraq war which has already killed 4%252C 000 fine beautiful children.....
You asked on O'Reilly where the Southern Baptist, the Methodist, mass killers where? Are you so uniformed that you have not read about Timothy McVeigh, George Jo Hennard or even, most recently in Orlando, Jason Rodriguez.
Mark is full of shit!...He writes to smear the president...he does not care if its true or not...he turns everything around to make this administration look bad...Mark writes bullshit....
Mark write rubbish on a daily basis but I found this specific column laughable; the word article speaks of unbiased writing of thish Mark is clearly not. If his unintelligetable rants about OUR president aren't funny enough, he plays the patriot for critizing the president JUST TO CRITIZE the president card. I didn't vote for Obama and I'm not happy with much of what he's doing but to use words like Slaughte of troops and then to equate their deaths with Obama taking time to make an informed decision (something Mark knows NOTHING about) is just mean-spirited and wrong headed. Thanks Mark, for pulluting our political discourse just a little further.