Red Light Cameras Now Capture Speeders and Those Not Wearing Seatbelts
New ASSET Cameras Can Tell If You Don't Have Insurance and Even If You're Tailgating
The cameras cost the government a whopping $70,000 a piece and will sit on the side of the road, taking the place of traditional red light cameras that are already in place on Finnish streets. The cameras use a wireless data connection to connect to the "real" policemen, and use an internal generator for powers, which makes them self-sufficient.
The cameras are called ASSET, which stands for Advanced Safety and Driver Support for Essential Road Transport, and take a picture of both you and your license plate when you travel through intersections in order to determine whether you're sporting a seat belt, as well as run your plates for things like insurance.
While the cameras are currently only being used on Finnish roads, it stands to reason that if they are any kind of success we could see them hit the United States as well. The U.S. already uses traditional red light cameras in a number of locations, adding cameras that could also write tickets for seat belts and insurance would more than likely bring a lot more money into the states that do use them over time.
A red light camera that can do so much almost negates the need to have a police officer ever stationed in that particular area. Not knowing what the average traffic cop makes per year, I would imagine that the cameras would pay for themselves in labor alone in around two years. Theoretically they would be writing a decent amount of tickets each day as well, which could dramatically improve their usefulness as well.
Despite being financially responsible from a government standpoint, the cameras add a new interesting element to the areas they are in. Will drivers always drive safely because they know they're being watched by the ASSSET camera? Is it fair for a camera to decide whether you're guilty or not guilty of a traffic violation? In the event you were pulled over by the police you could explain why you weren't wearing a seat belt, why your insurance was out, or why you were driving so close to the car in front of you....the ASSET camera isn't going to give you that opportunity.
What do you think about having a red light camera that can also check for all of those things? Do you think they would be an asset to have? Or is it a Big Brother type situation?
Published by Ann Mapleridge
Ann is tech geek, craft beer lover, and avid traveler. View profile
- St. Louis Police Come Out Against Red Light CamerasThe St. Louis Police Board recently voted 13-3 against the use of red light cameras to ticket motorists who run red lights in the city.
- St. Louis Waited Months Before Installing Signs at Red Light CamerasThe red light cameras that were installed earlier this year may lead to a legal battle.
- First it was Red Light Cameras, Now It's Speed Cameras as WellIt's getting more and more like George Orwell's 1984, even if it is a few years late.
- St. Louis Aldermen Fined Because of Red Light Camera ViolationsMany of the St. Louis aldermen who voted to have red light cameras installed in the city have been fined for being caught by them. Some have had the tickets fixed and others haven't paid at all.
- All States Should Make Wearing Seatbelts MandatoryWearing seatbelts in an automobile should be mandatory in all states. So far, only seventeen states and the District of Columbia have enacted a law allowing police to stop and ticket a driver for not wearing a seat belt.
- How to Defeat Red Light Cameras
- GPS Red Light Camera Alert: Beat Tickets
- Chicago Buzzing over Red Light Cameras
- Are Portland, Oregon, Red Light Traffic Cameras a Big Scam?
- Things You Should Know About Those Red Light Cameras
- Are Red Light Cameras Unconstitutional?
- Red Light Cameras Remain a Controversial Issue Between Cook County, Suburbs, and T...
- The cameras cost the government a whopping $70,000 a piece
- Cameras will be catching speeders, those traveling with expired insurance, people not wearing a
