Representative Charles Rangel Introduces Universal National Service Act (Bill H.R. 5741)

Agnes Farside
Before it was announced that Democratic Representative Charles Rangel of New York was to be investigated by the House Ethics Committee, he introduced the Universal National Service Act (Bill H.R. 5741), on July 15, 2010. This bill has now been referred to the Committee on House Armed Services and the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.

What is the Universal National Service Act?

To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.

The bill goes on to state that it is the OBLIGATION of every U.S. citizen between the ages of 18 and 42 (excluding those with extreme hardships, physical or mental disabilities), to perform a two-year period of national service in the uniformed services. Conscientious objectors are not exempt from this service, as they will be assigned to noncombatant or civilian services. Uniformed service is described as Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine corps, Coast Guard, commissioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and commissioned corps of the Public Health Service.

The forms of national service that 18 to 41 year olds will be obligated to perform, either in a uniformed service or civilian capacity will be determined by the President of the United States. These may include national or community services relating to national defense and/or homeland security. The military service my include declarations of war, national emergency declared by the President, or contingency operations pursuant to a congressional authorization for the use of military force.

Implementation by the President in Section 105 is particularly interesting. The President shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this title, such as types of civilian service to be performed, standards of performance, penalties of failure to perform civilian service, and such other matters as the President determines necessary to carry out this title.

Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Section 1. Neither slavery nor INVOLUNTARY servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

At Columbia University on September 11, 2008, Democratic Presidential nominee Barack Obama states: "And if you go to small towns, throughout the Midwest or the Southwest or the South, every town has tons of young people who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's not always the case in other parts of the country, in more urban centers. And I think it's important for the president to say, this is an important OBLIGATION. If we are going into war, then all of us go, not just some."

Sources: Constitution of the United States, Wikipedia.org, govtrack.us

Published by Agnes Farside - Featured Contributor in Lifestyle

Agnes loves writing on a wide range of topics, but craft and gardening articles are her favorite. She may be a 'techie' during the day, but her evenings and weekends are filled working on one of her many cr...  View profile

8 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Patricia Sicilia8/3/2010

    While I think this is a bit drastic, I don't see it as slavery by any means. I think the age range is ridiculous, however. I think, right after high school or college, young people could benefit by some compulsory national service, be it military or domestic. Israel has a compulsory military requirement and I don't hear of much juvenile delinquency or crime there amongst their young people. I would have loved to have gone into the Peace Corps after high school, but you needed a college degree. Too bad Rangell's ruined it for himself now, this bill, or even a sensible form of it, will never pass.

  • Rae Lynne Morvay7/29/2010

    Very informative article

  • Lady Samantha7/27/2010

    I think that it's wrong to FORCE people into any sort of service.

  • Snidely Whiplash7/27/2010

    Rangel gum flapped about this a year or so ago. Bet he introduced this bill to change the subject of all the heat on him for his little indiscretions. Nice report Agnes.

  • Joan7/27/2010

    Abby, so funny:

    community service
    n.
    1. Services volunteered by individuals or an organization to benefit a community or its institutions.
    2. Similar work performed by law offenders to serve a sentence in lieu of or in addition to jail time.

  • Abby Greenhill7/27/2010

    I don't see anything wrong with people performing community service.

  • Bill Hanks7/27/2010

    sounds like the draft

  • Delicia Powers7/27/2010

    Thanks Agnes, a great report!!!

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.