Republican Senate Candidate Pat Toomey's Stance on Gun Control Has Some Reeling
A Contributor Perspective: He Could Have Philadelphia Going Backwards If Elected
Pat Toomey stands for less gun regulations. There were a few things that stood out about what he wants to change, but I would have to say the worst is the fact that he wants to reduce the waiting time for background checks for guns bought at gun shows to a mere one day. Pat Toomey also supported bills stop the ability to sue gun sellers for gun misuse. This just makes it all that much easier for people who should not have guns to get them. The latter part just gives shady gun dealers an out, a way to not have to own up to any responsibility for their actions for their practices. This also hurts the gun dealers who are on the up and up and follow all the laws to a tee because eventually people start seeing all the gun dealers as the same, which they definitely are not. I am not against guns legally purchased by law abiding citizens who have the right to own guns. I believe law abiding citizens should continue to have the right to protect oneself and their family. I also believe we have some pretty good gun control laws and if law enforcement had it just a little easier to enforce the ones we already have in place we would all be a little safer, especially here in Philadelphia. If things changed the way Pat Toomey wanted, law enforcement would have a harder time, as many criminals will slip through the cracks with such a short waiting period.
What Pat Toomey's Flippant Remark Was and How His Attitude Reflects Future Gun Violence in Philadelphia
The Inquirer Editorial Board reported* that when speaking in York last week, Pat Toomey was quoted as saying (his): "idea of gun control is steady aim," . This remark shows how casual his idea is about violence on the streets of Pennsylvania. As I stated in the beginning of this article, I live right in between two of the worst cities as far as gun violence in Pennsylvania: Philadelphia and Chester. These cities have long been known for the increasing gun violence. Upper Darby, just outside Philadelphia has had rising numbers in gun violence by people who also should not have been able to obtain a gun. In making gun laws slacker, even making fun of gun control makes our city more dangerous for families. If the person buying the gun was a law abiding respectful member of the community, why would they need a reduction in waiting periods? If the gun dealer was law abiding, why would they need the law to change so that there would be no ramifications by misuse of their license to sell guns? They wouldn't. The only people this would help would be criminals, and then in turn hurt families like my own.
There are many spots I cannot safely go with my son because in many cases it is innocent bystanders that are being injured and killed. I can't just rationalize anymore and say: "we are good people and no reason for anyone to have a problem with us." The reason for this is that there are so many criminals with guns and they just don't care who else is in the line of fire. It is not just criminals killing criminals anymore in drug deals gone bad or retaliation. It is children being shot because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. It is young mothers standing outside their own homes minding their own business. It is families like mine, who have nothing at all to do with criminal activities who are getting gunned down these days. As a matter of fact, the City of Chester had to declare a state of emergency this past July due to the outrageous amount of gun related injuries and deaths in just a matter of a week. They had to put a curfew in place from 9:00 PM to 6:00 AM, which within days was changed to 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. During this time, While taking my son to the doctor, we mistakenly got on the wrong bus and ended up dropped right in the middle of Chester. We were a couple hours away from the 6:00 PM curfew, but that certainly didn't make me or my son feel any safer. The City of Chester had been like a war zone, which is why the state of emergency was declared. One simple mistake could have ended very bad because of the amount of illegal guns on the street. With slacker laws, this will become even more of a problem.
How Gun Violence Can Be Reduced
Well, I am no expert, but I can say in my opinion, by not electing officials who make jokes about gun control. We need to elect someone who will enforce the gun laws we already have in place, not make fun of them. In making a wise crack like that, Pat Toomey showed me that my family certainly would be no safer with him elected. It would affect my family because as it is, with so many criminals having guns our freedom is restricted. Making it even easier for the criminals to get guns, our freedom will be restricted even further.
Op/Ed
*Posted by Inquirer Editorial Board "Where bullets fly, Toomey's quip isn't that funny" Philly.com
Published by Jennifer Bove
I am a parent of three wonderful children and a grandparent of one, so I have plenty of personal experience to share in that area as well as some schooling in early childhood development. I Also have some sc... View profile
- Criminal LawAn explanation to assist the reader with a better understanding of what criminal law is.
- Controversial Topic Essay - Gun ControlThousands of people die every year in gun related deaths. People on both sides of the issue are very passionate in their stance. This article argues both sides and finishes with my own opinions on the issue of gun c...
- Why Gun Control is Needed in PennsylvaniaMy opinion on how tougher gun control regulations could help the crime-ridden city of Philadelphia.
Jesse Jackson Protests at Local Illinois Gun ShopThe Rev. Jesse Jackson and other protesters put Chuck's Gun Shop under fire. - Indiana Sends Gun Makers to TrialIndiana's Court of Appeals ruled today that a lawsuit holding gun manufacturers responsible for criminal activity can go to trail. The gun industry had argued that a Bush "legal shield" protected the gun makers and d...
- Barak Obama's Gun Control Positions
- Law Abiding Citizens Should Get Bonus
- Putting Power Back into the Hands of Law-Abiding Citizens
- Gun Control in an Economically and Socially Troubled American Society: Turning the...
- Gun Control: Law vs Rights
- Arizona Immigration Law - Will it Work?
- Law is a Part of the Illegal Immigration Debate


18 Comments
Post a CommentGreat article and good to know about Toomey
Waiting period? Wait for what?
Annoyed at people who don't want any gun control.. grrr. good article
Thanks for the analysis.
Thanks, Jenn!
What a lot of rot. Gun control doesn't work period. Recently the CDC relunctantly reached that conclusion and the CDC has been trying to get rid of guns almost as long as the Brady bunch. Their study concluded the 26,000 gun control laws show no effect on reducing crime. So more laws, stricter laws is not the answer. Criminals simply don't obey laws.
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." - Douglas Adams
The problem is..the only ones waiting for the protracted time period are the law abiding..the perps do not abide by the law and have instant access to their illegal wares.
Cut off my comment. To sum it up, you would hold firearms dealers to a higher standard than any purveyor of potentially dangerous instruments. You don't like guns so you are going to single out those that sell them.
Hopefully we won't see the day where the First Amendment is interpreted as narrowly as the Second. Online comments like these might be reviewed or censored because the current administration doesn't approve of your viewpoints.
Jennifer, I hate to tell you this but you sound like a representative for the Trial Lawyer's association. You probably didn't mean to, and I sympathize with your predicament. Let me point out a few problems with your arguments.
First of all, waiting periods have been abused by law enforcement and other governmental representatives in the past. In localities where gun owners are discriminated against, they have been subject to ridiculous waiting periods as a way to harass them. In New Jersey, which has had harsher laws than PA, even though a person went through all the hoops to get a firearms card, it took a period of THREE TO SIX MONTHS to be able to purchase a handgun. RIDICULOUS.DISCRIMINATORY.
Second, you state that a victim should be able to file a lawsuit against the firearms seller, which in most cases would be a gun dealer. How often do car salesmen get sued for selling a car to a drunk driver? Do they sue Dell and Apple for selling computers that might be used to download kid