COMMENTARY | House Republicans are offering President Obama and the Democrats a deal that they ought not to refuse, but likely will. They propose to pay for infrastructure spending with oil and gas lease sales at places like ANWR.
The Republicans are sweetening the deal by giving coastal states a 37.5 percent share of the revenue for offshore leases. This would provide much needed money for some cash-strapped states struggling to balance their budgets. In particular, California would be faced with a choice of adhering to its environmentalist ban on offshore drilling or else allowing it and enjoying the cash flow that could be used to balance its books.
The Democrats have demanded that infrastructure spending be paid for by their solution to everything - tax increases on the rich.
It is unlikely that any grand bargain will take place that swaps infrastructure spending for increased oil and gas drilling before the next president is sworn into office. While the deal would be a win-win for everyone - more roads and bridges, more domestic oil and more jobs, and increased economic growth - the idea runs smack into a dogma of the Democratic Party.
That dogma can be expressed thus: Private commerce is suspect at best, evil at worse. In any case, private commerce has to be heavily regulated and supervised by the government to make certain that the evils of capitalism are kept in check.
That rule applies very heavily to the oil and gas industry. Hydrocarbon fuels are considered dirty, evil, and the cause of all sorts of social ills. Despite the fact that the American economy absolutely depends on ready access to oil, natural gas, and coal, the Democrats are dedicated to the proposition that the production of these resources should be curtailed as much as possible.
This attitude has greatly contributed to the economic malaise that the United States is now experiencing. If one disdains economic activity and wants to curtail it, one should not be surprised if there is less of it, with all of the attending consequences.
The way out of the economic stagnation America finds itself in is to begin to encourage economic activity. That starts with increased oil and gas drilling.
Published by Mark Whittington
Mark R. Whittington is a writer residing in Houston, Texas. He is the author of The Last Moonwalker, Children of Apollo, Dark Sanction, and Nocturne. He has written numerous articles, some for the Washington... View profile
Direct Participation in Oil and Gas Drilling Programs - Part Two / Memor...Learn how to invest in oil and gas drilling programs and acquire ownership directly in the well and the leases. Learn more about non registered securities/memorandums/ working...- Direct Ownership in Oil and Gas Wells - Part One / SecuritiesLearn how to invest in oil and gas drilling programs and acquire ownership directly in the well and the leases. Learn about non registered securities/memorandums, Operators and Geologist. Learn about working and net...
IADC Oil and Gas Conference - Who Can Attend?Companies working in the oil and gas industry, with a focus on drilling, production, oilfield manufacturing or rigs can join IADC.- Oil and Gas Investing: How to Profit from High Oil PricesOil prices are through the roof. But there's a way you can hedge yourself against further increases, reap huge potential gains, and secure valuable tax benefits. But be mindful of risk, too, which is significant.
- Jurisprudential Aspects of Oil and Gas LeasesMuch litigation has arisen concerning the rights of lessees and lessors in relation to oil and gas leases and the various tools states and the federal government have used to regulate the industry.
- EPA Proposes New Air Pollution Standards for Oil and Gas Drilling
- Why Oil and Gas Prices Fluctuate
- The Myth that Government Spending on "Infrastructure" is Necessarily a Great Inve...
- Roy Barnes Answers Questions on Abortion, Spending and Guns
- John Kerry's "Infrastructure Bank"
- Spending Less on National Defence and Security
- Obama to Allow Oil and Gas Drilling in Vast Offshore Areas




2 Comments
Post a CommentA much better Idea then making the rich pay their share. Not.
of course they will oppose it.Nobody with any sense would allow oil drilling on the largest wildlife reserve. What's next coal mining in Yellowstone? fracking in Niagara falls? not a good idea.