The problem is knowing which sources are reputable, and which web sites may be merely twisting facts to sell a product or promote their own agenda. Information, and misinformation, can be passed around the world so quickly that we may not sure who or what to believe. Wikipedia and other user-edited web sites are fine for beginning your research, but aren't considered (by most editors) to be legitimate resources.
These questionable sites aren't necessarily giving wrong information, perhaps just skewing it in their favor. Retail websites that post informational articles that pertain to their products may be excellent starting points for unique article ideas. When I run across this type of commercial marketing ploy, I have to ask myself what this site's agenda is, and how I can capitalize on it. What fascinating piece of information from this article can I draw out and expand on? What legitimate resources can I use to refute or support these claims?
For example, my interest in alternative medicines and herbal therapies has led me to many web sites with scary information. I'm warned that deadly toxins are building up inside my body and my internal organs are going to revolt, and at the end of the article I'm greeted by an advertisement for a product which the site sells. This miraculous product promises to wash me clean and restore my good health. Halleluiah! Sign me up!
I look at such sites with a suspicious eye. Does legitimate medical research support the use of these alternative therapies, and what potential adverse effects might the consumer expect? Is there anecdotal evidence that these products work for some people, or are consumers throwing their money down the drain? I answer these questions by researching these topics on the web sites of well-respected medical web sites and listing them as my resources.
Whatever subject you are researching, choose your resources carefully. Your reputation as a professional writer is on the line, and once damaged is not easily repaired. As a professional research writer, I want to be considered as legitimate as my resources.
Published by Jill Davidson
Ms. Davidson is self-employed as a secondhand merchant, crafter, and free-lance writer. View profile
Why Professional Writers Should Write for Associated ContentHere are some reasons to write for Associated Content, even though you may receive higher pay elsewhere.
Women Writers to Watch on the AC in 2008The Associated Content boasts hundreds of prolific, professional writers, male and female. Yet, our culture, as liberated as we are, still many women feel it unladylike to promo...- What to Consider when Choosing Online Writing ContestsWith all the online writing contests, which ones should you pick? This article tells you what you should look for and how to choose the best ones for you.
- Earning Estimates of Professional Writers and Editors - Outlook and ConditionsWriters and editors employed in the computer and video game industry write articles, reviews, and books about computer and video games, platforms, companies, and the industry as a whole.
- Freelance Writing and Earning OnlineThis article attempts to give a brief picture about the ever growing 'online writing industry' and some useful tips for writers who want to make a handsome earning.
- PEN Writers Fund Establishes Fund for Victims of Katrina
- Following Submission Guidelines, Pleasing Editors Key to Writing for, Getting Publ...
- Travel Writing: From a Bloggin' Byline to a Payin' Byline
- Basics of the Writing Process
- How to Research that Perfect Paper
- Online Resources for Choosing a Baby Name
- Best Online Resources for Environmental Jobs
- Research writers must be careful to pass along only accurate information.
- User-edited sites are not usually considered reputable resources.
- Choose sites that are well-known and respected in their field.




19 Comments
Post a CommentThanks for the information. It sounds as though you do research things very well. I enjoyed this article.
This is a great very helpful article J. I hope you know that Rose kitchen wrote you as one of the best of the year!
Good article. I usually use Wikipedia for established facts, like what the capital of Zimbabwe is or something. It's often helpful to accompany it with other facts.
Sarra, great idea! I've done that also, and should have suggested it.
Great advice, thanks. When I do use wiki, I just go straight down to the bottom of the page and go to their sources. This is especially helpful when looking for medical studies that are hard to find on search engines.
Good job done here.
Good point, Angel.
It's always best to verify facts from several sites if possible.
Good reminders! Thanks.
Very, very good advice!