Review of The Hurt Locker: The Iraq War They Didn't Show You
This 2009 War Movie Studies the Iraq War and Its Participants Through the Suspense of a Bomb Squad
In my view, the most ingenious part of this movie is how relentlessly suspense-filled action sequences serve to develop characters and themes. The script is written by first-time screenwriter Mark Boal, who was an embedded journalist with an actual EOD (Explosive Ordnanace Disposal) team in Iraq. The story is structured around one bomb-defusing scenario after the next. Actor Jeremy Renner stars as Staff Sargeant William James, a true warrior whose battle-courage is little different from recklessness. We identify with his "bad dude" persona but see how his fearlessness comes from an adrenaline addiction. This bomb tech has no place in the world other than inches from death.
The Hurt Locker was produced independently on a relatively low budget and shot on location in Jordan, only a few miles from the Iraqi border. Director Bigelow decided to shoot on location after considering Morocco, and the effect is an authenticity only available to a war movie made only miles from the actual war while the war is not yet over. Every audio and visual effect is used to build suspense and reproduce the dreadfulness inherent in touching something that could blow any person into smithereens. Just as suspenseful is the fact that any "haji" (local Iraqi) could be an insurgent. Indeed I was on the edge of my seat throughout.
A few stars cameo (Ralph Fiennes, Guy Pearce, David Morse), but for the two-hour movie we follow three relative unknowns: Jeremy Renner (as James), Anthony Mackie (as Sgt. JT Sanborn), and Brian Geraghty (as Specialist Owen Eldridge). Their characters represent different aspects of every soldier, from reckless courage to fear to psychological frailty. We see how their comradeship belies the soldier's difficulty in building an emotional attachment to someone who could die the next second. We see their survivor's guilt, their selfish desire to simply survive, and the brutal effect of constantly facing their own mortality.
The Hurt Locker fits strongly within the traditional war film genre. One departure is that war justifications -- political considerations -- disappear as the characters simply do their jobs. The soldiers don't curse much and also don't utter racist or homophobic pejoratives, which builds our respect for them and keeps the audience focused on the story -- and the ovenlike desert setting ready to explode at any moment. One of my favorite moments was when the soused Staff Sgt. James decides to sleep in his ballistic EOD helmet, purposefully or not a reference to The Iliad's Hector, the Trojan warrior who removes his fearsome battle helmet to embrace his son.
The Hurt Locker is a great movie because of these kinds of resonances, even if the movie is not technically innovative in structure or special effects. One could do much worse than portray the Iraq War as one man placing his hands on a bomb, not knowing if it's life or death.
Published by Adam Schenck
Adept, informed reviewer who writes for readers with discriminating tastes. View profile
Jarhead: A War Movie for People Who Don't Like War MoviesSam Mendes' follow-up to American Beauty follows the training and deployment of an elite sniper group to Iraq before and during the first Gulf War- Movie Sleepers for the Summer of 2009A look at some of less publicized movies coming out for the summer of 2009.
- 2009 Fall TV Shows: The Bad CallsEvery year, TV networks churn out the latest TV shows that they think will be worth our while. About half of the time, they're wrong.
Summer Movie GuideA complete listing of films being released in June, including.. brief synopsis description, rating, and link to trailer.
- Movie Review: The Hurt Locker
- The Hurt Locker Film Review
- The Hurt Locker (2009) Exclusive Interview with Star Jeremy Renner
- Movie Review: The Hurt Locker (2009)
- The Hurt Locker - Kathryn Bigelow Returns!
- The Role of the Internet in the Iraq War
- Denzel Washington to Portray Fallen Soldier in Iraq War Film
- Over 200 hours of footage were edited down to the 131-minute length of the final cut.





2 Comments
Post a CommentI haven't seen this movie yet, but I hope to, maybe tomorrow. I liked your comment about battle courage being akin to recklessness. Individuals on bomb squads must be reckless, or adrenaline junkies. How else could they cope?
It used to be that war movies were mostly made with the help of the government, renting film crews equipment and advice etc... This is obviously changing with new and cheaper filming technology, a good thing in my book.
The fact that "war justifications -- political considerations -- disappear" is indicative of a government without a hand in the production.
One of the very best movies to come out this year. Good review!