Review of Reading the Bible in 90 Days

Finding Out the Bible is a Strange Read in Many Ways

Christopher Cudworth
"The Bible in 90 Days" is an increasingly popular course being offered through churches across America. Author Ted Cooper figured out that people could read the Bible in a prescribed period of time if they had a clear, attainable schedule to follow. Cooper himself experimented in reading the Bible and determined that reading 12 pages a day would allow someone to read the complete book in 90 days. The series includes a Participant's Guide and an illustrated paperback called The Essential Bible Companion that provides "Key Insights for Reading God's Word," a topic we shall address later on in this article.

The most appealing aspect of the Bible provided for the course is its size and format. Gone are the annotations and explanations that fill most versions of the Bible. That simple step eliminates about 50% of the physical (and therefore mental) bulk of the book itself, making the task seem eminently more attainable.

The inside cover even comes with a checklist of chapters so you know if you're staying on schedule. The whole process of reading the Bible is charted out for you. Just commit to reading 12 pages a day and you will be reading the Bible in 90 days.

Churchgoers seem to greet this task with a breadth of emotions. Some are enthusiastic while others feel great trepidation. Many Christians never have read the book that forms the foundation of their faith. In some cases there may be hidden guilt over the realization that there is ignorance of God's word. But people who take on the challenge may be surprised, in ways both pleasing and unpleasing, what the Bible has to offer.

Diving into the Book of Genesis, we find that the creation story offers an almost painfully brief description of the beginning of the world. One wonders what the fuss about creationism as a scientific premise is all about, for the passages about creation read like a whisper in the wind almost, the way God seems to have spoken to human beings throughout history, quietly, and giving them no more than they needed to know to find meaning in circumstance.

Then Genesis dives into a chronological, genealogical map of broken, disturbing familial relationships in which wives deceive husbands, sons kill brothers, husbands sleep with maidservants to bear children and tribes break off in warring factions. Pretty much the Bible makes clear early on that the human race is one mixed up, confused and dangerous lot.

It does not take long to realize that the Bible is something of a literary roller coaster, built around the hills and swales of personal and collective fortune among "God's people" who invariably fail in their efforts to stay faithful to the one true God.

Having read large swaths of the Bible previously in order to write a book about the impact of biblical literalism on politics, culture and the environment (The Genesis Fix, A Repair Manual for Faith in the Modern Age, review at www.naturesymbol.com) I resolved to partake of this effort to read the Bible in 90 days in an open-minded way. My wife and I discussed the first few days of reading with bemused amazement at the antics of ancient cultures, the sometimes strange laws created to manage human behavior and the many ways people chose to break those laws, and for often odd purposes. Significantly, so-called "family values" of monogamy and fidelity were notably absent. Republicans would have had a hard time getting elected on the family values vote in ancient Mesopotamia.

The very complex process of creating bible translations should be evident in reading the bible in so short a period as 90 days. But for perspective on whether the Bible is a perfect book or not, you can read about the many ways bible translators and scribes have made errors over the centuries that have sometimes had great affect how we view the persons of God, Jesus and other characters and events in the Bible. To learn more about the process of how the bible contains errors similar to those identified in the translation now known as The Bible in 90 days, read "Misquoting Jesus"(2005, HarperSanFrancisco) by Bart D. Ehrman, a biblical scholar whose evangelical upbringing was tested and altered through discovery of overwhelming academic and historical evidence that the Bible(s) we read today were not copied from original sources, then copied badly in some cases and altered purposely on other occasions to fit political and religious agendas as the Christian faith evolved.

Reading The Bible in 90 Days is proving once again that it takes a rational, comparative effort to arrive at a faith in God that is true, accurate and justifiable. We can roar through the Bible taking every word at face value or we can partake in the process of determining the cumulative truth and value of the book we call the Bible with diligent respect. Whether it takes 90 days or a lifetime, that is a pursuit worthy of our attention.

Published by Christopher Cudworth

I am a writer and artist who has worked in marketing and promotions for newspapers and agencies. Outside work I am involved in environmental issues, faith and family.  View profile

  • Reading the Bible in 90 Days is an effective way to read the entire Bible
  • Reading the Bible in 90 Days is challenging but manageable
  • The book Misquoting Jesus is a good comparative read to understand Bible translation
The Bible has not been copied or translated directly from original sources, but from copies of copies over generations. Inevitably, some errors in translation and recording have been made.

5 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Christopher Cudworth4/4/2012

    Michael: His scholarly response to Bart Ehrmann's work is certainly convincing. But the fact of the matter is that ALL Christians effectively make choices about what they choose to follow and what they do not. All those laws in Leviticus we no longer abide. The tradition of accepting slavery. On and on. So you either make the argument that the bible was in error somehow on those laws and traditions or you engage in a game of selectivity. And it's not non-believers doing that, it's the most ardent believers in most cases, trying to adhere so closely to the bible they could never be in error. And what do we get? A confused, disillusioned populace of believers who can't reconcile the bible to simple scientific beliefs. And that's not how Jesus taught us to learn and believe. His organic use of nature in his parables supercedes that kind of anachronistic teaching.

  • Michael Krauszer4/4/2012

    It's great that you're getting people to read the Bible!

    I see you mentioned Bart Ehrman in your article- have you checked out different articles/videos Norman Geisler has on him? Google both their names at once and a bunch of stuff should come up. Also try Youtube, with both their names in the search again, and a few video should come up showing a presentation Geisler did. Might be interesting for you

  • lifeengineer3/7/2010

    I am currently over half way through reading the bible in 90 days. It is an eye opening experience and I highly recommend to read the bible as you would a book (from start to finish). You will gain much more perspective. Good article.

  • Meki g10/23/2009

    I think that I am up for the challenge. Great article!

  • Sylvia Cochran10/19/2009

    An interesting idea. I think it is doomed to fail when the reader hits the Book of Numbers, which is drier than a tome on statistics, but who knows, it might actually work.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.