ANALYSIS | Although running on a conservative platform, Ron Paul is more libertarian than Republican. It is interesting to note that the candidate may rightfully consider himself as the father of the American tea party movement. The Boston Globe explained in 2007 that Paul supporters timed a fundraising blitz to coincide with the "234th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party," which eventually turned into the much larger movement.
The polling shows that Paul's bid for the presidential nomination is a bit rocky. Gallup outlines that between May 20 and 24 he had garnered 12 percent in support. The numbers remained in the double digits for the most part -- even climbing up to 13 percent in August and September -- only to decrease to 8 percent for the period between October 3 and 7. Nevertheless, he is fourth behind Mitt Romney, Herman Cain and Rick Perry.
So where does he stand on social issues?
Ron Paul on Abortion: A Pro-Life Champion
Drawing on his background as a gynecologist who brought more than 4,000 babies into the world, Ron Paul unambiguously declares that "life begins at conception" and the right to life applies to "those born and unborn." Not afraid to tackle the issue head on, he calls for a repeal of Roe v. Wade and plans to pass a "Sanctity of Life Act" that makes his understanding of the beginning of life the law. Furthermore, he calls for a federal defunding of abortions, in particular Planned Parenthood.
To Paul, abortion is a road marker on a "slippery slope toward euthanasia and human experimentation." In a statement consistent with his current stand on the issue, he addressed the legislature in 2003 concerning the partial-birth abortion ban. Even at this juncture, the current presidential candidate did not neglect to highlight that dealing with crimes related to abortion is fundamentally a states' rights issue, not a matter of federal jurisdiction. Although he favored the partial-birth abortion ban, he did not approve of its language that placed legislators into a position to "draw a 'bright line' between abortion and infanticide."
The Candidate on Gay Marriage: A Mixed Bag
His states' rights stand makes it difficult for same-sex couples to peg Ron Paul's opinion on gay marriage. The Human Rights Campaign points out that the candidate did "support the repeal of DADT" (Don't Ask, Don't Tell), but at the same time he also comes out in support of DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act). It is his unwillingness to favor a marriage equality amendment that makes him a difficult candidate to love for socially progressives.
In fact, a 2004 brief before the House of Representatives highlights that even though Paul opposes "federal efforts to redefine marriage as something other than a union between one man and one woman," he concurrently does not favor an amendment to the Constitution that would protect the current definition of marriage. He continues to point out that marriage was instituted by the people entering into the covenant, not the governments that oversee them.
Ron Paul on Homeschooling, Marijuana
Homeschooling families find a staunch ally in Paul. The candidate advocates the practice and -- putting his money where his legislative mouth is -- called for tax credits to benefit homeschoolers. Once president, he will protect parents' rights to home-school against legislation that seeks to curtail it.
With respect to marijuana, Paul considers the war on drugs a "catastrophe." With his by now trademark consistent position, he calls for the states to regulate drugs -- just like alcohol -- in a way they see fit.
Published by Sylvia Cochran - Featured Contributor in Automotive, Politics, Travel and Lifestyle
Sylvia Cochran works out of sunny Southern California and has been freelance writing -- full-time -- since 2005. SEO-optimized Internet copy includes news analysis, political Op/Ed and parenting as well as a... View profile
- Partial Birth Abortion- the Real Factsresearch paper centered around the argument that partial birth abortion is wrong and should remain illegal
- Partial-birth Abortion: Is it Leading to the End of Women's Right to Abortion in G...My opinion on the Supreme Courts decision to ban partial-birth abortion even at the risk to the Woman's health. Thoughts on Abortion and if this decision making us slowly head back to the 1950's.
- Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. Defends Partial-birth AbortionThe MSM has anointed Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. as their heir apparent but what does he stand for?
Partial-Birth Abortions?The abortion issue will always be a hot topic, but now with new leadership in Congress, which way will this abominable practice of destroying VIABLE partially born babies go?- Partial Birth Abortions Banned by Supreme CourtThe United States Supreme Court rules in favor of banning partial birth abortions.
- The Abortion Issue
- Supreme Courts Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban
- Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003
- Partial Birth Abortion Ban is Backed by the Supreme Court
- Strengthening the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban. A Victory for Pro-Lifers?
- U.S. Supreme Court Votes to Uphold Partial Birth Abortion Ban
- Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Partial Birth Abortion




4 Comments
Post a CommentThank you all for stopping by and for commenting. @robert andrew scott: All the positions explored use quotes directly taken from (and attributed to) Ron Paul. To revise the article would first require Dr. Paul's revising his positions.
You should seriously consider revising your article. Ron Paul opposes those examples of anti-abortion legislation because they give power to the Federal rather than State governments. His social views are very much Libertarian, and he therefore supports full personal freedom, including abortion and same-sex marriage (or unions of any legal/religious kind, by whatever name).
I have watched Ron Paul for a long time and one thing is for sure, he is not a flip flopper. People need to realize that he is a Constitutionalist and when he comments on any topic it is about Federal rights vs state rights. It isn't a fair statement to say that he supports drugs, he just thinks that each state, by the people of that state, should be the ones deciding, not the Feds. People should notice how the media represents him because you are all being manipulated into a mainstream opinion of him. Anyhow, I support Ron on principle and honesty, the though of whether I'm throwing my vote away on someone who may not be the winner never even enters the equation.
What he is against, as he has stated is that he feels that the federal government should not have any say on the matter, and that state governments should be the ones to decide. There shouldn't be an any changes to our constitution, when regarding gays and same sex marriage. It should be handled by the states and keep the federal government out of the issue.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGaBAb_oS84
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIeW0DY64bE
http://www.dailypaul.com/141699/dr-ron-paul-on-gay-marriage-legislation
http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/09/05/ron-paul-on-his-religion-and-homosexuality/
There is a number of links out there, that all speak on his views. So while, yes he has voted yes and no on gay rights and marriage issues, he has still stuck to his views, and those views are, we the people should decide, not some government body.