Congressman Paul advocated abolishing the Internal Revenue Service and the income tax, claiming that the money the government already receives from various other sources (excise taxes, tariffs, etc.) would keep funding at the same level as ten years ago. He would also bring American troops home from all overseas bases, where he says they're simply not needed any more and in fact do more harm than good. This redeployment home would save billions of dollars every year.
"You can start saving immediately by changing the foreign policy and not be the policeman over the world," Paul told Russert. "We should have the foreign policy that George Bush ran on. You know, no nation building, no policing of the world, a humble foreign policy. We don't need to be starting wars. That's my argument."
The tersest exchange occurred when Russert challenged Paul on the numerous spending earmarks for his Texas Congressional district, and the fact that he advocates term-limits while remaining in Congress for 18 years. Paul was noticeably flustered on several occasions, and gave some unsatisfactory responses, especially with regard to spending in his district.
As to why he puts earmarks in bills while still calling for spending cuts, Paul had this answer:
"I put it in because I represent people who are asking for some of their money back," he said. "But it doesn't cut any spending to vote against an earmark. And the Congress has the responsibility to spend the money. Why leave the money in the executive branch and let them spend the money?"
Russert clearly was unsatisfied with this explanation, and it will likely ring hollow with anyone outside of his own constituents; the $400 million in earmarks for his district he has put in spending bills over the years makes his anti-spending rhetoric ring somewhat hollow.
From his calls to abolish the CIA and his characterization of America as moving toward fascism, Paul may have gained support in some corners, but certainly did not help his chances among the Republican faithful that will vote in next month's Iowa Caucus.
Sources:
Meet the Press; URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22342301/
Published by Bruno Somerset
I am a novelist & freelance writer living in Texas. I write mainly on arts and entertainment, politics and religion, with the occasional sports and humor piece thrown in to keep things interesting. View profile
-
Tom Brokaw and President-Elect Obama Discuss the Economy on "Meet the Pr...
Before Tom Brokaw formally stepped down as interim host of the long-running NBC news show "Meet The Press," he had one last interview to conduct. For this, Tom Brokaw talked wit...
- "Sunday Fox News" and "Meet the Press" Debate "Do-Over" in Florida and Michigan March 9th's "Sunday Fox News" and "Meet the Press" Debate "Do-Overs" in Florida and Michigan
-
Tom Brokaw Steps Aside for David Gregory on "Meet the Press"
The December 7, 2008, edition of the 61-year-old NBC news magazine "Meet The Press" was a big one. It featured President-Elect Obama. Tom Brokaw also passed the baton of host...
- Meet the Press to Be Moderated by David Gregory David Gregory, an NBC news star for almost a decade, was officially selected today as the full time replacement for the late moderator Tim Russert on "Meet the Press"
-
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell Endorses Senator Barack Obama for...
The endorsements keep pouring in for Senator Obama. Secretary of State Colin Powell put to rest the rumors and announced that he was endorsing Senator Obama on NBC's "Meet The...
- Republican Presidential Candidate Ron Paul vs. Tim Russert of Meet the Press
- Tim Russert of "Meet the Press" Dies in Washington
- Timothy Russert Passes Away at 58
- Ron Paul: Not Just a Nutjob - a Poorly Informed Nutjob
- David Paterson on Meet the Press: New York, Not White House, Should Decide
- Obama on "Meet the Press": "Can't Solve Afghanistan Without Solving Pakistan"
- Meet the Press: Obama Admits He Still Has a Cigarette, Now and Then
|
|
16 Comments
Post a CommentTim Russert did the same thing to Howard Dean in 2004. Hatchet jobs are his forte. On the other hand, watching Dean's and Paul's handling of Russert's tactics only strengthens my enthusiasm for them. (Who knows, maybe that's Russert's intent. ;)
James Orleans, have you watched Tim Russert's interviews with the other candidates? Have you ever watched Meet the Press before, for that matter? That's what Tim Russert does, that's his job. Didn't you see how foolish he made Giuliani look? Meet the Press is not a spot for a candidate if he wants an hour-long advertisement. It is a spot for a candidate who wants to show that he/she can stand up to strict scrutiny. Ron Paul clearly can't.
The fact that Russert didn't ask Paul about the Iraq War, monetary policy, or his stand on abortion, shows that his whole interview was little more than a cheap attempt at character assassination. Why ask him about anything that might increase his popularity? Digging up quotes from twenty years ago by disgruntled former employees, and misquoting journalists, asking him repeatedly if he plans to run as a third party candidate when he has been elected as a Republican for the past twenty years. The whole interview was pathetic. I was heartened at the way Mr. Paul handled the situation, but he was stuck making good answers to asinine questions, which is hardly interested to a voter tuning in to hear about real issues. He rarely even gave Mr. Paul the time necessary to answer the questions posed completely, constantly interrupting him, talking over him. What a hatchet job. Tim Russert you've lost a lot of credibility with generation-X and younger.
Great Job. Every new article presents Ron Paul's case in a new way, and opens another set of eyes!
Ok, Idiots in the Mainstream Media, let me say this for the last time: Earmarks are NOT PORK.
Earmarks are in bills where the money has ALREADY BEEN BUDGETED. It has ALREADY BEEN STOLEN from constituents. It can't be "given back". So, since individual refund checks can't be written for taxpayers of a district, representatives earmark it for proper representation. It's the only compromise in an otherwise corrupt system.
PORK is when extra money... EXTRA MONEY THAT HASN'T BEEN BUDGETED is added to the end of a bill. Ron Paul doesn't do this.
If you look at the earmarks he has endorsed (then voted against), they're actually fairly tame.
Its surprising how many people who are against Ron Paul initially haven't even heard of his positions. After seeing his history, people are often swayed. :)
Btw, ever look at those earmarks? A lot of it goes to direct public causes, or at least something that makes his constituents quality of life better. Much much much better than nearly every other earmark out there.
http://www.sunlightfoundation.com/ Check it out, start digging into info about candidates from that site and others like it.
Ron Paul is not a great speaker.
Huckabee has the Reagan charm.
Romney and Thompson sound dignified.
Obama soothingly tells me of his wonderful dreams for America...
but it is the squeaky voice giving us the tough love that captivates us.
The content far surpasses the style of the others.
We're not hiring an actor, we're hiring our leader.
The good Dr. has the courage to speak his convictions. He never panders. http://freetoys.com
a reason to fear Ron Paul - who wants to allow young adults to opt out of SS and Medicare and is vehemently opposed to socialized medicine?
ABE - (shill for coal companies) do they have nothing to fear from Ron Paul's desire to deregulate nuclear power so we have safe, clean unlimited power?
CVS - A Pharmacy whose bread and butter is insurance and Medicare. Dr. Paul wants to remove the incentives for hospitals to overbill us.
Xerox - another defense contractor. Here's a link to their defense contracts of 2006.
http://tinyurl.com/2wjzbb
MasterCard - Huge banking coop.
Why didn't Mr. Russert let us know that he had a HUGE conflict of interest BEFORE THIS SEGMENT AIRED? When half of your advertisers are in defense, the other half split between banking and Big Pharma doesn't that constitute NEWS? I mean, Mr. Russert dug back 20 years or more on Dr. Paul to try to find "dirt". Why not look in your own mirror? I find the FACT the Mr. Russert did NOT disclose this relationship
Tim Russert is really something. He investigates OTHER people back to what they said 20 years ago, but does Mr. Russert disclose his OWN conflicts of interest? No, instead he silently plans his character assisination attempt. Well, you kind of have to expect that type of hatchet job from someone who in bed with the status quo. I did my OWN little fact checking expedition and found the advertisers for Meet The Press.
GE lists 824 items regarding defense contracts on their website for 2007. http://www.ge.com/search/index.jsp
Boeing lists 72,200 items regarding defense.
http://tinyurl.com/2nm5y8
Fidelity Investments - tax and 401k services, need I say more?
Hummer - child company of AM General the company that makes all the HMMWV's for the Army
UBS - Another banking company, certainly they have nothing to fear from Dr. Paul, right?
Toyota - makes cars which are CURRENTLY cheaper to make in Japan (and then assemble here).
Aleve - you think Bayer Pharmaceuticals has