"An ever-expanding federal government financed by an ever-increasing tax agenda is absolutely the wrong way to grow our economy and create new jobs. But now almost one year into this new majority, we've seen time and again that Democrats are willing to impose that reckless agenda on the American taxpaying public...[T]he middle class shouldn't be burdened with more than $200 billion in new taxes, regulations, and law-suits...[T]he American workforce -- not Washington politicians -- is the engine of our economic growth. Our greatest resource is the strength and ingenuity of our people. It's time the Democrats take that lesson to heart and stop their assault on our future economic
vitality," Blunt stated.
Critics of the record high tax proposal of the Democrats, which the Party claims is targeting the wealthiest Americans only, assert that it has been generally acknowledged that the best way to maintain a free society is to maintain incentives to upward mobility and becoming wealthy-not punishing the wealthy and not taking away incentives to the capital-creation that increasing wealth engenders.
These critics call the Democrats' targeting of the wealthiest Americans class warfare and assert that it has no place in American society, where people are supposed to have upward mobility free of the artificial barriers of castes and class like never before in mankind's history.
What's more, they point out that the 10% wealthiest Americans already foot 70% of the annual income tax bill on their own, and that increasing taxes on the "wealthy" would mean increasing taxes on the great majority of small businesses-the latter making up a large segment of Americans that the Democrats always vow to protect first and foremost along with the impoverished, and a group of people who create a lot jobs that would jeopardized if their taxes become too burdensome.
As more Americans rise into the status of "the wealthy" from middle class roots, more Americans would be targeted for tax increases, rather than more Americans (unjustly) protected from them.
The supporters of the Democratic agenda have expressed outrage at Republican Party tax cuts that favor larger businesses and the protecting of investment capital predominantly engaged in by the wealthy. However, the backers of these tax cuts insist that it is the wealthy who create most jobs and capitalization, and thus expand the economy while also contributing the most to philanthropic and charitable causes-which, critics insist, are endeavors much better practiced by individuals than by a Big Brother government.
Original Newswire Source:
http://prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/12-05-2007/0004717493&EDATE=
Published by Brant McLaughlin
I am a Writer driven by endless curiosity and a deep desire to waste time creatively. View profile
- Middle-class Life: the Way it Isfor those of us with middle-class backgrounds, we prefer "life" rather than "lifestyles"
- Education: Leaving Out the Middle ClassA look at the middle class students role and struggles in the education system.
- Presidential Candidates Vs. The Realities of Middle-Class AmericansA mother looks at some realities faced by middle class families, looks back at history, and wonders whether any of the candidates passes muster for the challenges facing the next American president.
- Middle-Class Families in United States At Financial RiskA report from Demos and Brandeis University uses a new index to assess the financial health and stability of middle-class families in the United States.
- The Vanishing Middle ClassMiddle class has been used as a description of the working individuals who comprise of an income anywhere between $25,000 and $100,000 annually.
- Middle Class Americans Are Not Secure in Their Economic Position
- Hillary Clinton Wants To Strengthen Middle-Class America
- The Rise of the Novel Through the Rise of the Middle Class
- Black Middle Class
- Edwards - Champion of the Middle Class?
- Avoid the Middle Class Decline
- The Middle Class & the Impact of Bankruptcy




2 Comments
Post a CommentHrm...not sure what you mean, Nick.
Great article, but I think it does not neccesarily know party lines.