Well, he recommended his close friend Bernie Kerik for the position of Homeland Security Secretary in late 2004.
That's right, Rudy Giuliani, the man who says he is the best candidate to protect us from future terror attacks, recommended the man currently indicted on federal corruption charges to head up our agency for homeland defense. (George W. Bush, of course, accepted this recommendation, but Kerik was forced to withdraw his nomination due to another scandal).
Bernie Kerik, who counts Rudy Giuliani not only as his friend but his mentor, is also the subject of a lawsuit brought by book publisher Judith Regan against the News Corporation (owner of Fox News) for encouraging Regan to mislead federal investigators about her sexual relationship with Kerik during his bid to become the Homeland Security Secretary.
News Corp. allegedly did so in order to protect Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign. (Regan and Kerik reportedly used an apartment near Ground Zero, that was supposed be used by exhausted 9/11 rescue workers, for their sexual affair).
Rudy Giuliani, who is arguably the least qualified presidential candidate seeking the Republican nomination, has admitted that recommending Bernie Kerik for the position of Homeland Security Secretary was a mistake. After all, how could he not? But this was more than just poor judgment. Rudy Giuliani and Bernie Kerik were, by all accounts, close. Real close.
Is this what America can expect from a Giuliani-run administration? More cronieism and scandal? Considering that Rudy Giuliani is running largely on the issue of 9/11 and homeland defense, the answer must be a resounding yes.
The question is whether the Bernie Kerik factor will come into play in Giuliani's bid for the Republican nomination. Because it will most certainly come into play during the general election, if Rudy Giuliani somehow finds himself on the Republican ticket.
Published by Jack Oceano
Jack Oceano is an attorney whose articles cover a broad range of topics, including politics, legal issues, travel and tourism, dining and nightlife, sports, books, movies, music, and writing. View profile
- What Does Fred Thompson Bring to the Presidential Campaign?With interest in the top tier of Republican candidates appearing to lag, interest has at least temporarily turned to campaign "circler", Fred Thompson. When he stops circling the campaign and finally lands will he be...
Unfair Practices in the Presidential Campaign?President Bill Clinton and Mark Penn strategically released books at this critical time, giving Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, tripling the attention brought to her ca...- How to Get a Job on a Presidential CampaignEach presidential election cycle, thousands of wannabe campaign staffers vie for the precious few positions available with one of the various candidates. How do those who are successful at procuring positions manage...
- What Sound Bites Are Reported During the Presidential Campaign and Why The use of sound bites through the careful selection of details is one of the ways the media presents the views of presidential candidates.
- Presidential Campaign Financing Since 1972An overview of efforts to regulate presidential election financing and specific methods, and the changes that have occurred over the last three decades. Special attention is paid on the topics of interest groups and t...
- Why Rudy Giuliani Should Become a Democrat and Run in the 2008 Presidential Race
- Election 2008: Rudy Giuliani Calls Bernard Kerik, "Basically, a Good Criminal."
- Rudy Giuliani: The Issues
- George Pataki and Rudy Giuliani's Potential Candidacy for the 2008 Presidential El...
- MySpace Enters the 2008 Presidential Campaign
- Associated Content's Best Articles of 2007 on the Presidential Campaign
- How Important is Communication Rhetoric in a Presidential Campaign?





16 Comments
Post a CommentGreat article, Jack! Soooo controversial! :P
No, Brett, I was explaining where you can find other info, because I assumed you were legitimately looking for it. There was no tone intended. I listed my main source; but you can find coverage of the litigation just about anywhere.
I'm not saying that there are no sources, i'm just saying you have to make it so that readers can access that information easily. Are you sore about the other debate or something?
I'm not sure how much Fox News is covering this (because they're involved in the litigation), but you can find info on it from every other major news source. And it was front-page news in every major New York paper.
I don't like Giulianni any more than you do, I was only saying that you are making some very big claims and you need to back them up.
I'm not making the claims, Brett. There is pending litigation. I am, however, quite surprised that you would want to defend Rudy. He's pro-choice, supports gay rights, and overall, very socially liberal. He's had three marriages, committed adultery. I'm surprised you like him.
If you are going to make claims as ridiculous as that you are going to need many many sources, msnbc is not nearly enough!!
Thanks for reminding me why political news disheartens me!
Late 2004 is ancient history, Anne? You're more than welcome to write articles on Bill and Monica, if you think that's an important issue in the upcoming election. I happen to think Giuliani's selection of a man now indicted on felony corruption charges to be Homeland Security secretary more vital, but that's just my humble opinion.
Hey Jack, since were doing ancient history here, how about an article on "The Bill and Monica Factor" or "The Hillary and Travelgate Factor". Or how about "the Hillary and Norman HSU Factor" I know you would ALWAYS strive to be fair.