Rudy Guliani Opts Out of Religious Broadcasters Meeting

Is Rudy Going to Ignore Evangelicals?

Jeff Musall
With the bare fact being that no Republican in recent memory has been able to win a major contest without at least the tacit backing of the religious right, Rudy Guliani might be trying to buck that trend. While on the surface it may seem like a bad gamble, is Rudy playing the smart card, letting the other candidates fight over the evangelical vote-and keeping himself clean from association with the far-right fringe in the process-hoping that he could hold all the cards at nomination time?

Starting February 17th and going through February 20th in Orlando, Florida, the National Religious Broadcasters will be holding their convention. And as one might expect, Republican candidates are lining up to try to woo the support of the evangelical leaders. For if the past is any indication, evangelicals tend to vote as their leaders suggest. There were some defections in 2006, but none major enough to change the paradigm. So what is Rudy thinking?

Perhaps he realizes that he is not going to get any endorsements there anyway, so why waste his time and tarnish his image as John McCain has. John McCain said in 2000 that "neither party should be defined by pandering to the outer reaches of American politics and the agents of intolerance whether the be Louis Farrakhan or Al Sharpton on the left, or Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell on the right." Of course, once John McCain figured out that he needed that base he changed his stripes rather quickly. In May 2006, he was the commencement speaker at Jerry Falwell's University. And next week he will be the guest of honor at a Falwell reception.

Mitt Romney will be doing his own work trying to mend fences too. Once pro-choice and a supporter of gay rights, he seems to be sliding those positions more to the right in an attempt to appeal to the far right base. He will be giving the commencement speech at Pat Robertson's University. This is the same man who once said he would be more of a champion for gay rights than Senator Ted Kennedy. There are candidates more appealing to the evangelicals, like Mike Huckabee and Sam Brownback. The problem with them is that they are currently only polling in the single digits.

Howard Fineman, writing for MSNBC, speaks about the 'Three Kingmakers." He is of course talking about Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, and James Dobson. According to Fineman, Falwell has already decided on McCain and Robertson is favoring Romney. Leaving only James Dobson as the undecided of the three. The problem is this-how many Americans, in 2008, are going to trust the candidate who ends up with the majority of these three "Kingmakers" behind him?

So maybe Rudy Guliani is playing it smart. He knows that if he is the Republican candidate the evangelical voters will mostly do one of two things. Hold their noses and vote for him over the Democratic candidate, or stay home and not vote at all. Either way will help him.

Published by Jeff Musall - Featured Contributor in Sports

Jeff Musall has a passion for writing, a knack for frank and informed expression, and a desire to engage the minds of readers. His work has been featured in newspapers, magazines, and various online venues...   View profile

4 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Henry 9/8/2007

    If these kingmakers are willing to support someone based on their "electability" rather than, win or lose, their stance on the TRUTH, then maybe these evangelical leaders are also compromising God's truth. Scary, considering their sizable following. If they truly are looking for someone with integrity, intelligence on all issues and truth, THEY would be wooing Dr. Ron Paul to be their candidate. But I doubt this will happen and this is the reason I no longer give my 10% to CBN. Pat Robertson, I love you like a brother but I cannot continue to back YOUR backing of a Mormon (non-Christian) who clearly favors abortion and gay marriages but has changed his tune purely for political purposes.

  • Lori Leidig 2/19/2007

    Avoiding the evangelicals is a point in his favor in my book. Romney and McCain both sicken me at this point. Guliani isn't much better as far as options go, but this one thing raises him just the merest bit of a notch.

  • Vonnie Chestnut 2/16/2007

    Interesting article that makes one think.

  • Timothy Sexton 2/16/2007

    It's a real mystery who the GOP nominee will be. Rudy G. is a twice-divorced moderate with no actual accomplishments other than standing with a megaphone and urging New Yorkers to get out and start shopping after 9/11 to prove America that those dang terrorists weren't going to break us. John McCain has become an absolute joke, a pathetic clone of Bush and nobody wants that. And Romney is a Mormon, which I personally have nothing against, but it's hard to imagine the Religious Right falling in lockstep behind that guy. If the GOP had any brains--and it's clear they don't--they'd draft James Baker to run. He's the one Republican that could actually draw some Democrat votes at this point, I think.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.