The split that seems to be occurring in many of the more mainstream Christian denominations seems to be one over how the church will treat gay and lesbian members. Some allow them to be members of the clergy, others allow them full fellowship while others look the other way if they know. The more liberal Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) suffered from declining membership, while membership is on the rise in Fundamentalist and Evangelical churches. The split in the Anglican Church nearly occurred over the ordination of openly gay bishops, but the Presbyterian congregations left over the Presbyterian Church (USA) giving the ministers some discretion in same sex-marriages, which the organization opposes as a whole.
The split will likely continue to occur in other churches as the debate over same sex marriage rages on as a societal issue. At the core is how Christians interpret the Bible. Many social conservatives favor a literal interpretation of Biblical passages condemning gay and lesbian behavior. People who are socially liberal and Christian tend to believe those passages are outdated and in some cases culturally specific. The prime example is the verse that appears in Leviticus.
For the Anglicans the issue of a Christian split over same-sex marriages may be resolved temporarily, and the Presbyterian groups seem to be splintering over it, but the issue will likely be played out in other Christian venues. The rift itself would be unnecessary if a literal interpretation of the Bible were not insisted upon by fundamentalist Christians, but Christian congregations seen as being more concerned about Biblical morality will likely see an increase in membership if there is more tacit approval of same-sex marriages in certain situations.
Same-sex marriage stands to cause a rift in many other Christian churches along social liberal and social conservative lines. The Anglicans and the Presbyterians are the first two to be affected and many other denominations will probably face a similar split depending less on whether they do what they feel is right, but rather what political maneuverings will leave them with the most members.
Resources:
"Conservative Presbyterians Leave Church." The Advocate
Published by S. Landis
Born early in one February morning in 1977, the world has since graced me with its presence View profile
- Easter at the Hollywood Bowl with Bel Air Presbyterian ChurchLooking for a unique way to celebrate Easter? Curious about the Christian faith but don't want to attend a traditional church service? Come to the Hollywood Bowl.
- Presbyterian Mission Leaders Report Haiti UpdateLeaders of the three primary agencies of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) providing aid to earthquake-stricken Haiti spoke for an hour on Thursday, February 11, to an open meeting of church members on the World Wide Web.
- Presbyterian Clergy of Jewish Descent in the SouthwestExamination of Presbyterian ministers of Jewish descent, current relations between Presbyterians and Jews, and historical immigration patterns.
- Presbyterian Pastor Discusses Homosexuality and Biblical ContradictionsIn American society religious leaders cower in fear of reporters, fear of losing their congregations and fear of losing respect in their communities, real religious leaders who will answer hard questions are hard to c...
- The Tie that Binds: A Resource for the People of the United Methodist ChurchUnderstanding Ecumenism for people of United Methodist Church.
- Presbyterian Leaders Turn to Long Term in Haiti
- Same-Sex Marriage
- Vermont State Senate Approves Same Sex Marriage
- The Meaning of the Seal of the Presbyterian Church USA
- Homeless Gatherings Increasing in First Presbyterian Church Parking Lot in Dallas,...
- Trinity Presbyterian Church - Westchester Avenue - Rye, NY
- First Presbyterian Church in Bakersfield, California: Outstanding Children's Programs

3 Comments
Post a Commenttwo people in 'love' can also be denying natural affection that was once the good moral of society.
Okay, "marriage" is not 'for the two people in love' except as they care about their public-standing ... i.e. it removes them from the "single"-list. The government (the cheif thing that's 'stopping' gay marriage) doesn't care whether you're involved or un-involved, except so far as you increase/enliven the population. The 'marriage'-license should be entirely done away with and replaced by the 'breeders'-license. But as far as "churches" go; 'the world' is sinful, and marriage (i.e. licensed-sex) is of the world.
It's too bad two people in love can't get married with out the world judging them. Thank You fer sharin'. ;-}}>