Sandra Bullock Adoption and Jewish Bris Brings Out the Conspiracy Theories

Sandra Bullock Adopts a Baby Out of Love and Nothing Else - but Not Everyone Believes That

Roz Zurko
Sandra Bullock's announcement and picture of her beautiful baby boy, Louis, has sparked an overwhelming amount of happiness for her world wide. It is so nice to rejoice with Sandra instead of pity her. This is what her handlers were banking on happening, according to the conspiracy theories being talked about on IUC.

Jesse James Nazi ObsessionStories Could Have Been Damaging To the Adoption Process

Sandra Bullock who has been under the microscope since her husband's, oversexed behaviors shed light on his Nazi obsession. Even Jesse James' own father took to the website TMZ to discuss his son's "obsession" with the Nazi culture and practices from a very early age.

Although Sandra Bullock was blind sided by her husband's dirty secret sex liaisons, many found it hard to believe that she knew nothing about James' Nazi worshiping ways that have been strewn across the media in pictures and words.

This can be very damaging to Bullock's image and was an extremely hard situation to fix.

Sandra Bullock Adopts Baby and Has Bris To Better Her Public Image

In come the conspiracy theorists with their thoughts about Sandra adopting a black baby and announcing he will be having a Jewish bris at this particular time in her life. The comments left on an IUC posting about Sandra Bullock are reflecting these types of thoughts. Of course, there are the other comments who find this type of talk ridiculous.

One of the comments left by a reader says "Something smells fishy in Denmark...
...not only a black baby, but they had a bris? What a -hilarious- detail. I'm not buying it."

Some question Sandra Bullock's move as if she went out and got the baby for this purpose only. They are not buying a four year adoption waiting period. Now, I for one agree this is absurd, as do the others who wrote in and said, there are so many easier ways to smooth over a scandal than bring a baby into the mess.

Sandra Bullock Baby Story Worked For Her Public Image

I for one minute do not believe that Sandra Bullock would have adopted this baby out of anything but love. I also think the reports about Jesse James being obsessed with all things Nazi had Bullock very frightened about the adoption becoming final when this all broke loose, I know I would be. Famous or not, an adoption agency isn't going to put a child in a family where the prospective father is into "white power" as suggested in the tabloids the last few months.

Bullock's handlers carefully orchestrated the baby announcement in People Magazine, according to an article on IUC. It was planned to gather sympathy for Bullock and it worked. It is a very different case when you use your circumstances of already having a new baby to your advantage than it is to run out and get a new baby just for this purpose.

Adoption Process Leaves No Stone Unturned

Be reassured that the adoption process is strict and no stone is left unturned. Sandra Bullock having physical custody of the baby speaks miles for her being a genuinely good and wholesome person. The fact that the baby was put in Jesse James and Sandra Bullock's custody in January speaks to the fact that what ever Jesse James was doing, he hid it very well, from Sandra Bullock and the child adoption services.

Sandra Bullock most certainly did not adopt baby Louis to make her image better, she adopted a baby to give him a loving home.

References: 1. IUC 2. IUCTMZ

Published by Roz Zurko

Roz is a published freelance writer originally from Milford CT, a bedroom community for New York City. She writes full time from home in MA. She attended New Haven University and Graduated with a degree in...   View profile

  • Sandra Bullock Adoption Theories - Some Question Her Motives
  • Sandra Bullock Adoption Theories - There is always one in a crowd!
  • Sandra Bullock Adoption Theories - Why did Sandra Bullock Come out with Adoption Now?
Sandra Bullock Adoption Theories - There are always a few in the crowd, read how a very small minority are asking these questions.

4 Comments

Post a Comment
  • kenndal 5/3/2010

    i dont think anything smells fishy she had a bris because she couldn't risk taking the baby to the hospital and being found out and what smells fishy about her adopting a black baby? why does everyone think that when a white or black person adopts the opposite race that they are doing it for attention. i honestly do not think that Sandra is the narcissistic type and i honestly believe that she loves that baby. and i dont think it is at all damaging to her image for one. i dont think she cares about her image as long as her baby is alive and healthy.

  • Roz Zurko 4/30/2010

    Main Entry: conspiracy theory
    Function: noun
    Date: 1909
    This is out of Merriam Webster's Dictionary for Conspiracy Theory:
    : a theory that explains an event or set of circumstances as the result of a secret plot by usually powerful conspirators.

    Maybe you might want to check your facts before playing the Internet Police, but I thank you for dropping by. "Please write more logically"

  • Minister Faust 4/30/2010

    Evidently the writer doesn't know what "conspiracy" means. A conspiracy is a secret plan involving at least two people to break the law.

    Since Bullock hasn't broken any law we know of, and since no one has said she has, by definition, *no conspiracy theorist* has said a word on this subject.

    It's critical that journalists understand the language that is at the heart of their profession.

    Apparently the writer means that *critics* are claiming that Bullock's adoption is a cynical image-control move in light of her recent marital scandal.

    Suggesting that a celebrity might do something extreme to control her image is hardly the stuff of what the writer apparently thinks a "conspiracy theorist" is (i.e., a delusional paranaoic).

    For the record, all police, prosecutors and judges who deal with public charges of criminal conspiracy (to defraud, launder money, to racketeer, to murder) are, by definition, conspiracy theorists.

    Please write more logically.

  • Tony Payne 4/30/2010

    Good reporting. The story is definitely getting more complicated.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.