Sarah Palin, Anne Kilkenny and the Authority to Ban Books

What is Objectionable to One May Mot Be Objectionable to Others

Saul Relative
At one time, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was the mayor of Wasilla, Alaska. While she was mayor of that small town, Mayor Palin found herself at odds with people over various aspects of her job, which is the normal run of events with regard to politics. It happens. Not everybody will always be in agreement on a given topic. That is individualism and that is as it should be.

But Sarah Palin has a problem with wielding authority it would seem. The first red flag that went up when Senator John McCain announced Sarah Palin as his running mate was that she was under investigation by her own state legislature for an alleged abuse of power. Dubbed "Troopergate," this state-turned-national issue brought to light an alleged abuse of authority by the governor's office in the dismissal of the state Safety Commissioner because he had refused to fire Palin's sister's ex-husband, who was a state trooper at the time.

And then there was the citizen's letter from Wasilla resident Anne Kilkenny that has been circulating on the internet. Time magazine and the New York Times have gone on record that the allegations in the letter have been corroborated.

Anne Kilkenny grew up with Sarah Palin. She knows the family. She also has a problem with Sarah Palin's new mythologized status as the potential vice president of the United States. The letter is an attempt to rectify that.

The many odious items concerning Sarah Palin as a politician enumerated by Anne Kilkenny this writer will let pass for the time being in order to address the one issue most important to a writer and to a free society: the freedom of expression, the First Amendment. In her letter, Kilkenny states:

"While Sarah was Mayor of Wasilla she tried to fire our highly respected City Librarian because the Librarian refused to consider removing from the library some books that Sarah wanted removed. City residents rallied to the defense of the City Librarian and against Palin's attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew her termination letter."

The banning of books rings ominous to anyone that understands what lies at the heart of the banning. Authority over expression. What is objectionable to one may not be objectionable to others. The opposite is also true. But to use one's authority to dictate what others read is an abuse of the First Amendment and the freedom of those others to express themselves through their self-exposure to certain forms of media. Under the guidance of the Supreme Court, decency standards are to be determined by locality, due to the extension of the abovementioned truth -- one locality's standards may differ from another locality's standards. A "to each his own" way of dealing with local mores and standards.

Simply put, if Mayor Sarah Palin had wanted objectionable materials to be taken from the library, she should have went through the legal process of proposing, writing, and passing legal standards upon which those materials would be judged. With a public mandate. By voting the standards into being.

Not employing censorship.

Not through personal tyranny.

An individual who would take it upon themselves to be sole arbiter of what a society -- in this case, the town of Wasilla -- reads, peruses, or studies is a person who is an oppressor of ideas and free thought. Without the cooperation and the support of public mandate, this sole proprietorship of governance is generally referred to as dictatorial. It is authoritarian and it suppresses.

It is as undemocratic and as un-American (read: unconstitutional) a method of governance as can exist. U. S. historian Gertrude Himmelfarb said, "As liberty of thought is absolute, so is liberty of speech, which is "inseparable" from the liberty of thought. Liberty of speech, moreover, is essential not only for its own sake but for the sake of truth, which requires absolute liberty for the utterance of unpopular and even demonstrably false opinions."

No one should have the sole discretionary power to deny the dissemination of ideas.

Mayor Sarah Palin has a problem with authority. She wields it with an absolutism that involves the exclusion of ideas. And she wields it against individuals who would attempt to thwart said authority.

This writer has but one more point to add, in language that is sure to be understood by Sarah Palin and all those like her over the years that would have banned The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Catcher In The Rye and the Harry Potter books: "You can ban our books when you pry them from our cold dead fingers."

Sarah Palin is 60 days away from being vice president of the United States.

Published by Saul Relative

WVU graduate, with degrees in History, English, Secondary Education, Computer Programming, and Psychology (and nearly a degree in Political Science). Originally from West Virginia, with stints in Virginia,...  View profile

32 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Timothy Sexton9/26/2008

    Well, in Sarah Palin's defense, she does seem to have cracked open a book or two since she got past The Cat in the Hat. Too bad we cannot say the same about George W. Bush. Apparently, he was so upset by his inability to penetrate a certain mystery novel in his past that he gave up reading books forever. Memo to Dumbya: Turns out it wasn't really Red's grandmother after all, but rather the wolf in disguise.

  • saul relative9/13/2008

    One thing is certain in all this, J. Michael: None of these candidates are true conservatives. Not one...

  • saul relative9/10/2008

    Noticed that, too, did youj, cahotek? Well, Bush muzzled the press during his tenure and they're still acting a bit skittish. Perhaps if they began to do their job and act as part of our democratic system by reporting the news and exposing the hypocrisy and corruption, then they wouldn't have to worry so much about being censored and browbeaten into submission. It's pathetic...

  • saul relative9/10/2008

    Don't put too much faith in the collective to make itself less ignorant, Eric. Remember, Germany had the most educated populace per capita in the world when it allowed Hitler to subvert its democracy and start his Third Reich. Remember also that Germany maintained then and remains nearly totally Christian. The people of the United States vote authoritarian ideologues into office at their own peril.

  • saul relative9/10/2008

    Government is both, Jon -- individualistic and collective. And I never wrote that government was individualistic. Even a dictatorship takes the implied and forced consent of the ruled. A fascist state still has to have many players to oppress. I wrote: "Mayor Palin found herself at odds with people over various aspects of her job, which is the normal run of events with regard to politics. It happens. Not everybody will always be in agreement on a given topic. That is individualism and that is as it should be." I also point out that Sarah Palin is an authoritarian who likes to eliminate those that oppose her, giving her sole discretionary power in some instances. Even Bush has done this with his presidential signings and his exexutive privilege mandates. So there is individualism involved. It is up to Congress, the Supreme Court, and the people to make certain that the one does not rule the many.

  • Charlene Collins9/10/2008

    Excellent! The more I read the more I question.

  • Eric Pudalov9/10/2008

    This is indeed frightening; though I haven't received the circulating e-mail in question, I had heard many of the stories surrounding it. I am disturbed by the fact that Palin would attempt to censor something that she personally took issue with, as opposed to going through the proper legal process. What's worse...I fear that many citizens of this country might not object to it. I hope that I can have more faith in people than that.

  • Louisa3649/10/2008

    EXCELLENT ARTICLE!!

  • JON HOPWOOD9/9/2008

    Sorry. I read your article an it is quite good. Sorry I blew my stack. I have a Crying Baby as my icon because I blow my stack quite readily, then regret it! ;-(

  • Adrienne Jenkins9/9/2008

    Not only 60 days away from potentially being vice-president but only one heart attack, stroke or other life threatening disease away from being potentially president.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.