Sarah Palin and Spiro Agnew: Strange VP Coincidences

It's Watergate, Troopergate, and Deja Vu All Over Again for the Republicans

Tsu Dho Nimh
You have all seen the emails about the amazing coincidences between the assassinations of presidents Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. But did you know there are equally amazing coincidences between the Vice Presidential candidacies of Sarah Palin and Spiro Agnew? When Nixon announced his choice of veep, many of the delegates and media said, "Spiro who?" When McCain announced his choice of veep, many of the delegates and media said, "Sarah who?"

The coincidences run deeper than that, eerily deeper. As Lance Morrow of Time magazine said after Agnew's death "In Nixon's calculus, Agnew was a safe-bet border-state novice with no heavy baggage and a Greek-immigrant father, which would help with the ethnic vote." As far too many political columnists and late-night comics to name have said, in John McCain's calculus, Palin is supposed to be a safe-bet border-state novice with no heavy baggage and a pair of X chromosomes, which will help with the female vote. Tricky Dick Nixon lost his bet, and Sarah's baggage has inconveniently held more dirty laundry than expected.

Agnew's designated role in the 1968 campaign and as VP was as attack dog, attracting support from conservative Republicans by making flamboyant alliterative attacks on the nattering nabobs of negativism while Nixon pretended to be moderate in a political version of "Good Cop, Bad Cop". Palin calls herself a pitbull in lipstick and her role in the campaign appearances so far is to warm up the audience by making derogatory comments about Obama until McCain takes over with his "I'm not an Washington insider, I just hung out with them for 26 years" speech.

Agnew ran for governor as a reformer and Republican outsider. Palin ran for governor as a reformer and Republican outsider. Agnew was only in his second term as governor of Maryland when he was tapped by Nixon's magic wand. Palin was only in her second year as governor of Alaska when the wand whapped her. How weird is that?

Even weirder, both politicians got their start in local politics and received commission appointments as consolation prizes for losing an election in which 5 other candidates were running. Agnew was appointed to a county zoning appeals board after he came in dead last in a 5-way race for a local judge. Palin was appointed to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission after she lost the 5-way primary race for Lieutenant Governor. Agnew was removed from the board when the politician who appointed him lost an election, and made a name for himself in state politics by raising a fuss about cronyism. Palin quit in a snit and made a name for herself in state politics by raising a fuss about corruption on the board.

The legal similarities are still developing, but both Agnew and Palin have shown a stonewall-and-stall strategy when confronted with their abuse of power. Agnew resigned in 1973, after 5 years as VP, and plead no contest to charges he had asked for and received $147,500 in bribes during his time as Baltimore County Executive and as governor of Maryland. It might not have surfaced, but he insisted the payments continue while he was VP, at which time the contractors who were paying him turned him in for corruption. [Time, 9/30/1996] Palin is being investigated for attempting to use her power as governor to take care of a family feud and firing the state's Commissioner of Public Safety for refusing to fire her sisters ex-husband. Although she initially promised to cooperate, Palin has recently been erecting a wall of her own between the investigation committee and her staff.

After Spiro Agnew's death in 1996, historian Allan Lichtman observed, "He will always stand as one of the symbols of the corruption that undermined the Nixon administration." Joan Huff, author of a biography of Nixon, called Agnew "a tiny blip in history." [Greensboro News & Record, 9/19/1996] I wonder what the comments on Sarah Palin will bein 40 or 50 years. Will she be a blip or a long-lasting symbol. Will the series of creepy comparisons end with another vice president facing charges for bad behavior in office?

Published by Tsu Dho Nimh

I'm a long-time technical writer with time to spare. I'm an omnivorous reader, a superb researcher, and a very fast writer. I'm also a good photographer. I'm fascinated by medicine, and annoyed by quack...  View profile

  • Political novices can be a liability.
  • If you believe this means anything, remember to put the shiny side of the tinfoil out.
Nixon wanted John Connally as Spiro Agnew's replacement, but inconveniently, Connally had recently been a Democrat and his confirmation was not going to be easy. Nixon settled for Gerald Ford, and Ford ended up as President.

7 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Literary Corner Cafe11/22/2008

    A fun article. Personally, I think Palin is going to be just a blip in history. Perhaps a joke is more like it. And yes, I'm a Democrat. LOL

  • Notes from Joblessville10/11/2008

    How do you say it? Ah yes...Amen to that! You definitely had some new and refreshing insights I'd never read anywhere else!

    The pitbull made me laugh even at 6:53am EAST standard time and you have one of the cutest avatars ever.

  • Nancy Tracy10/2/2008

    Fascinating and fun analysis. I just subscribed to you based on this intelligent and entertaining article alone. Can't wait to read more!

  • Anne Stjern9/24/2008

    Here's another nugget for comparison. The only other VP candidate with as little contact with foreign leaders as Palin was Agnew. I guess he's who she was referring to when she told Charlie Gibson that if you look at it historically, there were plenty of VP candidates who had never met a foreign head of state. Great article!

  • Christine Bruness9/22/2008

    Interesting comparison, Tsu. Very well written. I have to tell you that my husband and I do not trust Palin at all! We feel that plenty more negative things will be coming out about her. I think her record as governor is terrible, too. Needless to say, we won't be voting for McCain/Palin.

  • jcorn9/20/2008

    To try and clarify on my comment, I meant to communicate that history and events can surprise voters long after they've cast their votes. They believe a candidate will act one way and can then feel mislead or hurt. Other times, their hopes are fulfilled. That is what I meant by "many are surprised". Not immediately after voting, necessarily, but as time goes on.

  • jcorn9/20/2008

    This sentence really jumped out at me: "Will she be a blip or a long-lasting symbol?" Having watched so many elections - and yes, felt remorse for having voted for some, relief for having voted for others....my personal take is that history and the decisions we make as voters don't always have clear ramifications, even though we hope we are making "the right choice" when casting our vote. This makes voting for any candidate an act of faith, hope, research, trusting one's instincts -and even then, many are surprised. This comment is in no way meant to indicate my support for any particular candidate at this point. I had parents who were split deeply -one Democrat, one Republican -and times when one or the other rued a choice of candidates - after the election.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.