Outrage has correctly resulted. Said one employee (quoted in a local Seattle news outlet): "It's a Christmas tree! It's not like they were displaying crucifixes or menorahs or anything religious, but Christmas trees that have been around here for years."
The employee is correct. Yet, this is nothing new. Even secular Christmas symbols, like Santa Claus and the reindeer (and, yes, trees), are increasingly under attack. Why? Because minority groups find them offensive. Why? This is a good question. I have been a Christian for over 25 years. I've grown up in church. I've never heard a Bible study consider the deep theological implications of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. And I've apparently missed the very deep, spiritual references to evergreen trees in the accounts of Jesus' birth - provided by Matthew and Luke. Perhaps a non-Christian show them to me.
I find it laughable (on the one hand) and very frustrating (on the other) that even the warm-and-fuzzy, completely secular symbols of Christmas are now the subject of such debate. That I have to expend time defending a decorated tree is unfathomable to me. If Sea-Tac Airport had a nativity scene up with a big billboard declaring: "Believe in Jesus or go to Hell," then I can understand the rabbi being a bit bothered by that. But this was not the case. We're talking about trees! Trees with big red ornaments! I would like to know how many religious conversions were inspired by these obviously profound trees. Were airport passengers walking past the tree on their way to the ticket counter, stopping and saying: "Oh my, what a beautiful tree. I think I'm going to become a Christian now"?
But Sea-Tac caved. Why? Because they were threatened by a lawsuit. Yeah, that's it. The new American way: Do what I say - or I'll sue you.
I like what Seattle Airport Commissioner Bob Edwards suggested. Take down the trees and put him a 9-foot tall statue of the Grinch to welcome people in. That's a great idea - and very appropriate to what's happening in America today. But I'm sure someone, somewhere would find some religious dimension even to that, and threaten another lawsuit.
Shame on you, Sea-Tac, for backing down. You should've told whoever objects to a lousy tree to take a one-way flight elsewhere. And if they want to sue, bring it on. It's time people start standing up to this nonsense.
Published by Brian Tubbs
Brian Tubbs is the Feature Writer & Columnist for Protestantism at Suite101.com, the principal blogger for the American Revolution & Founding Era blog, and the founder and course manager for ChristianMarriag... View profile
- Teen Clothing Stores in Seattle, WashingtonClothing stores for teens in Seattle, Washington are a great source for appropriate clothing for the teenager in your life. Clothing stores for teenagers are located throughout the Seattle, Washington area.
- The Caves of North ArkansasNorth Arkansas has nearly 2,000 documented caves. Of those, eight are privately-owned. Many of the others offer commercial tours to the public.
- My Christmas Tree AdventureFor many people, the day after Thanksgiving brings a fun family tradition. No, not shopping at the crack of dawn, but Christmas tree hunting. And everyone knows that U-Cut trees are best.
- Late Night Hunger: Check Out These Famous Seattle DinersSeattle's 24 hour diners and coffee houses are never empty. Here is a guide to the many coffee houses and diners in Seattle that are open 24 hours.
- Vegetarian Eateries and Restaurants in SeattleI am writing an article about inexpensive eateries in Seattle. I will include restaurants in several neighborhoods in Seattle.
- Seattle's "End of Summer" Festival This Labor Day Weekend
- Finding the Right Apartment for You in Seattle
- Best Senior Housing in the Downtown Seattle Area
- Top 3 Places to Take Your Children in Seattle
- Holiday Festivities in Seattle, Washington
- Hotel Review: The Westin Seattle
- The Top Bookstores in Seattle
- Sea-Tac has displayed Holiday Trees for over 25 years. Not this year.




3 Comments
Post a CommentJeff, as I indicated in a different article, there may not be a "war" (probably isn't) against Christmas - but there should is a "campaign" of sorts (be it concerted or coincidental) against the public celebration of Christmas. There are many people and groups who are actively trying to discourage the public (and by public - I am referring not only to government but also commercial) celebration of "Christmas" (meaning by name). You have to see that.
Good article. I just wrote an editorial about this situation today, but it is still waiting approval. Funny thing is that the Christmas tree really has it's roots in paganism. Up until the mid 1800's the Christmas Tree was considered an oddity in the US. I get offended everyday.. that is what happens in a country where you have freedom of speech.
I agree that the lawsuit mentality in America is over the top...but as far as the christmas trees go, those who can't shut the hell up about the so-called "war on christmas' have brought this. Because they have a hissy when someone says "happy holidays" or calls it a "holiday tree" they have made it a symbol of a religious celebration, and therefore subject to scrutiny. Again, I wish it wouldn't have to come to this, I like "holiday trees" but perhaps the rabid followers of Bill O"Reilly and the like should just back off and let them be "holiday trees"