The purpose of the federal cigarette tax is to finance an increase in funding to the SCHIP program (State Children's Health Insurance Program).
The Campaign says that in addition to funding increased federal health insurance coverage for the children of needy families (under the new legislation, some of these "needy" families can have household incomes of over $82,000 a year), the new federal tax will discourage children from smoking and encourage smokers to quit the habit by making smoking too expensive. The organization claims that for every 10% hike in the cost of cigarettes, seven percent of would-be smoker youths are discouraged from taking up the habit and four percent of smokers kick the habit.
The Campaign says that there is thus a victory for children's health, a victory for Congress in finding the financing it needs to increase the reach of SCHIP, and a victory for taxpayers because according to surveys 67% of Americans favor increasing the tobacco tax to finance increases in health insurance coverage.
Critics of the new tax say that it is hypocritical to tax what is called a bad habit and a health problem in order to pay for a program that is supposed to encourage health; that if smoking is that bad and that out of control it should be made illegal.
According to a study conducted by the Heritage Foundation, 22 million American adults will need to smoke regularly (two packs a day or more) through 2017 to keep SCHIP funded at the new level, before any future raises in funding are implemented, which critics say is very likely. So, they conclude, the federal government is taxing an addictive adult habit to keep children-that is, anyone under the age of 25-receiving a federal benefit. It cannot "discourage" the habit too much or it will come up against a funding gap.
What's more, the critics say, the federal government has no business funding health insurance. It is up to private insurers to compete for people's business, thereby offering the best way to keep health insurance premiums as low as possible. The critics argue that the rising cost of health care insurance is directly related to federal government meddling in the health care industry's affairs.
Children will now grow up expecting that the federal government will provide their health care, which is a form of socialized medicine that many citizens and members of the government, especially the majority of Republicans, completely oppose, the critics point out.
Published by Brant McLaughlin
I am a Writer driven by endless curiosity and a deep desire to waste time creatively. View profile
- Full-Time Student Health Insurance CoverageBe sure that your child who is a full-time college student has adequate health coverage. The answers to these nine questions about full-time student health insurance coverage will help you decide the best way to prot...
- How to Get Health Insurance CoverageThere are options available for health insurance coverage available to everyone.
- Pros and Cons of COBRA Health Insurance CoverageCOBRA allows you to keep your health insurance coverage for a limited period of time when you lose or leave your job. Be sure to consider the pros and cons of COBRA coverage before choosing it as you health care option.
- A Guide to Mental Health Insurance CoverageThis article is a guide to finding the right mental health insurance coverage that any American can get.
Illinois All Kids Health Insurance Coverage: Affordable CoverageIf you are like many working parents, your children may be uninsured, or only partially insured. The answer? Illinois state's All Kids Health Coverage - affordable and available...
- Important Health Insurance Information
- Your Family and Health Insurance
- HMO's: A Simple Way Out of a Maze of Health Insurance Choices
- New Federal Tobacco Tax Means Michigan Smokers Getting Double Taxed
- First the AIG Bonus and Now a Tobacco Tax Increase; Are Americans Selectively Taxed?
- Why the Tobacco Tax Needs Amendment
- Federal Cigarette Tax Hike Has Many on the Fence
