Senator John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin Make Beautiful History Together

Tony Jingo
Was it a gimmick? Was Obama's selection a gimmick? Can we realistically ascribe sincerity to political wrangling? That last question is easier to answer.

To forgo political speculation, let us analyze Governor Sarah Palin on the merits. She is certainly a righteous choice by Senator John McCain. Admittedly, it was not pleasing to the sensibilities at the sound of the news, but that is more of a testament to John McCain's maverick style than my insight.

Sarah Palin just added another crack to that ceiling and I must admit that on an emotional level it is pleasing to the sensibilities. Senator McCain just guaranteed that history would be made. He ensured another chapter in a textbook for future generations to study. I hope I am around when my grandchildren bring home paper detailing the events of 2008.

Do you remember the smell of the rexo-sheets with the purple ink from middle school? It is in the air now, a wisp of nostalgia.

Now, back on the ground the facts are here to be discerned and disseminated to advance the cause.

Governor Sarah Palin has demonstrated the ability to make tough decisions, to buck the status quo and do what is right for the nation. She fought corruption in her own party and took the reigns as a young Governor in the state of Alaska. Sarah Palin is a maverick in her own right.

Sarah Palin entered public life in 1992 on the platform of cutting wasteful spending and corruption. In office, she put her money where her mouth was by voluntarily cutting her own salary and reducing property taxes by 60%

As governor she acted against big oil, championed the creation of a natural gas line against the interests of big oil. She took bold steps to place money back into the pockets of Alaskan motorists via $1,200 rebates. The cure to the energy crisis? No, but it is relief while we combat years of malfeasance and foreign oil addiction.

Like any successful rehab endeavor, it takes years to kick the old destructive habits. What is your respective governor doing in the mean time, are they looking out for you? I know what my governor is doing. Nothing.

Both Parties failed us miserably regarding energy. Barack Obama calls for a 10-year project for renewable energy in order to give us some relief (I'm all for that.) McCain, recently saw the light that Sarah Palin was calling for all along, the necessity for off shore drilling along with exploring all sources of energy (I'm all for that as well.)

During this 10-year exploration, Obama ridiculed the idea of tax relief at the pump. While his "energy plan" is realized, long after he is out of an office he is not yet in, we continue to be greased at the pump.

Hillary Rodham Clinton, John McCain, and Sarah Palin have all demonstrated the courage and the ability to cut into the profits of big oil in order to provide some relief for motorists. Their ideas protected highway departments and construction projects dependent on gas taxes. That's right no one is losing their jobs because of energy rebates or relief.

Those three politicians, two of them women, demonstrated the leadership skills to force big oil to participate in providing relief for their best customers (you & I) while exploring alternate energy sources. The aforementioned politicians were able to do this with out demonizing an entire industry that provides and manages an energy source Americans heavily rely on. Big oil earned the right to a profit, but must share the responsibility to the environment and the nation it serves.

Who is actually in the pocket of Big Oil? Could it be a politician that is determined not to challenge big oil? Certainly not Hillary or John, or Sarah who actually has a proven track record of handling big oil against her own interests. Did I use the term maverick yet?

Sarah Palin is not without her controversy. She admits having experimented with marijuana when it was legal to possess small amounts of it in Alaska albeit remaining illegal on a federal level. She states she does not support legalizing marijuana, worried about the message it would send to her children.

The governor from Alaska also has her own version of Trooper Gate. A controversial suit leveled against her by a dismissed high-level employee is sure to provide fodder for the other side.

John McCain is receiving criticism over this selection. Many strategists give kudos to the selection and some are saying the transparency of going after the disenfranchised Hillary supporters flies in the face of credibility. I touched on those questions in the introduction.

In response to the McCain-Palin ticket, Bill Burton a spokesperson for Barack Obama released this following statement, "- John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency."

Mr. Burton has a point. One of the first questions that should serve as a litmus test for a person to qualify as VP is if that person can take the reigns of the presidency.

I'll answer that by offering this: Sarah Palin, by virtue of showing up and getting things done since 1992, as a member of the council, mayor of a small town, and currently as a rookie governor and commander-in-chief of the National Guard has more executive, legislative, and military experience (by virtue of commanding the National Guard) than the TOP of the Democratic ticket.

Barack Obama followed up his gracious commentary regarding Palin's selection by saying "it is more of the same." How so Mr. Obama?

When is the American voter going to challenge the rhetoric and catch phrases emanating from the Democratic nominee? Do we realize that the McCain ticket by record and deed, not by rhetoric or hyperbole, has a proven record of accomplishment to further Hope & Change?

American voters, I implore you to challenge the machine. History is not always good history.

We do not have to accept marginality or empty rhetoric for the sake of change. Let us embrace real (positive) change for the sake of our nation not our own individual desires to promote history for the sake of promoting history.

"My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you-ask what you can do for your country." - John F. Kennedy, 1961

Source; Wikipedia

Published by Tony Jingo

An American Patriot with an independent view on today's topics. Jingo (noun) One who vociferously supports one's country  View profile

26 Comments

Post a Comment
  • qiuqin huang4/15/2010

    http://uselv.com Louis Vitton&Vuitton&Louis handbags&designer LV&designer handbags&LV monogram&LV casino

  • qiuqin huang4/15/2010

    http://mbtshoeswalking.com MBT Shoes&women MBT&walking MBT shoes&MBT footware

  • Michael K. Miller10/30/2008

    Arguably, the majority of bodies inhabiting the United States no longer possess the character, intellect, or morality to be identified as Americans - and thus, further the cause of this our great, diminishing democracy... We shall see on November 4th. I would that God prove it not so....

  • Rodney Southern9/9/2008

    Tony! I loved this. I think that it is hilarious that Obama is less qualified than the VP republican nominee. The fact that she is a woman is just a bonus. I think she is fantastic, and I love that she has the gumption to even fight her own party in times of corruption. I do not see Democrats doing that. I do not think I have ever seen a Democrat do that. That is class. Am I the only one that thinks she looks like Tina Fey of Saturday Night Live fame?

  • Secretsides9/6/2008

    I believe you are very intelligent, but I do not agree with your politics. I think that even though it may sound old fashioned if a woman has a child, and I mean a newborn, with special needs, her first responsibility is to that baby. NO matter how good a father is he cannot be a mother. There is plenty of time for women to choose to have a career, but motherhood should be first. If her children were all older that would be a different story. But it is obvious that her children are NOT! I also find the remark about the only difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull is lipstick? Sorry Tony I think she is totally wrong for VP letting alone President, and as far as McCaine goes, I shudder, to think of him the so called Maverick who says that he wants to run the country like Bush?

  • H.Rox9/6/2008

    Well-written, thoughtful, as always, Tony. Oh- I think our governor has done something- he said no to Broadwater.. trying to cut the budget deficit. How that helps me, personally, dunno, but it's got to be good to try to make the state not go bankrupt.

  • Justice Lives Not9/6/2008

    Great job as usual. I like her, flaws and all. Even though you know who I think really deserves the keys to the White House, I must say that a McCain/Palin ticket is certainly less riskier than the alternative presented by the Dems!

  • Tony Vega9/5/2008

    Bridget, you may not be into facts either..but I'll share some with you anyway; the Annenberg foundation has provided 100% funding for one of the most popular fact checker sites out there. The Annenberg foundation has also funded the Chicago Annenberg Challenge(CAC). More facts: The CAC was FOUNDED by domestic terrorist William Ayers the Chairman of the board was none other than Barack Obama....Facts are stubborn things..Factchecker.org despite their non-partisan claims..clearly has ethical issues of their own...From being involved with Obama, Ayers, to hiring staff writers from PBS and assistants for Bill Moyers...can you say in the tank??

  • April Lorier, not signed in9/5/2008

    Tony, I think Sheryl Young's article "The Perfect Presidential Candidate" says everything - almost - I want to say. None of the candidates has lived a life of perfection as Jesus did for 33 years. Therefore, all are flawed. But I love the way Sarah Palin has electrified the election! I know she's going to get ripped apart in the next 2 months, but since she's a Christian, she has Someone to fight her battles. Good article, Tony.

  • Donna Porter9/3/2008

    LOL @ Aly's comment. It was a shock to the sensibilities wasn't it? Then it was like an a-ha moment. But, alas, being new the comfort level is not quite there yet...I have a feeling it will though. I'm seeing this campaign through the debates...ought to be interesting. :-)

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.