Governmental legislation such as the PATRIOT Act is, arguably, Big Brother-esque in its conception. "PATRIOT" is not a term referencing injured Minute Men sitting atop Bunker Hill with drum and fife as they fight for the birth of a nation, but an acronym for Public Law 107-56 entitled Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001.
Our Constitution is strongly rooted in 17th and 18th century European political philosophy. One component of that philosophy is social-contract theory. This theory states, in brief, that the State is created by the mutual consent/contract of its members, and political principles rational human beings would consent to, assuming they could indeed contract, and insuring existing political institutions correspond to those principles. In short, our government, based on implicit contractual terms, represents the people; or does it?
Some people would suggest that our government is out of control as it enacts laws that limit freedom, infringe on civil liberties and implement foreign policy dictated by an elitist class. These may or may not be valid points. Examined more closely, it could be suggested that it is we, the people, who have failed in this contract.
This is a day and age when more people visited the website hosting Britney Spears' genitalia, then viewed information offered by federal websites. It is a time when twice the number of people viewed American Idol in a single night, then actually voted for political representatives. It is an era when the "informed" are only so because they catch Fox News or CNN with their ever-present scrolling headlines but haven't taken time to visit Internet accessible governmental records that present legislative bills, budgets, commission reports and voting records of all three branches of our government.
So we gave drunk and crazy Big Brother the keys to the family Buick; told him to run some errands for us and we are flabbergasted at the results. The truth is that we did not just happen upon this political quagmire. It has been evolving over the last few decades. Machiavelli noted the nature, or real politicks, of governing bodies. Big Brother has not been evolving as much as fulfilling its Machiavellian nature.
It is our apathy, or indifference that has evolved. It is our absence from the social contract that has given Big Brother the opportunity to legislate regardless of representation or public opinion. Somewhere in the recent past, Americans have somehow disconnected from the State.
As the Romans learned through the decline of their Empire, or the Soviets through the dissolution of their Union, great nations are not toppled by outside foes; but implode, or decay internally, under the weight of sustaining resources in the name of preserving a way of life.
When you step into the political arena, there are two opponents. One is Big Brother while the other is the collective group known as the indifferent. It is the latter who is the most formidable opponent for the screams of thousands dying overseas, the gunshots that take the lives of young black men who are undergoing a systematic genocide in our own cities and on our own soil, the cries of children who participant in a dismal educational system and have difficulty passing basic skills tests have not awakened them.
Published by Paris Kaye
I am a writer! A "writer" in the sense that the act of writing is neither a pastime nor a luxury but a necessity. I have published a novel, several short stories and freelance articles and abstracts. View profile
Is There Really Supposed to Be a Separation of Church and State?The words "separation of church and state," do not appear in the Constitution, contrary to popular belief. It's amazing how many people believe this phrase exists as a constitut...- Separation of Church and State? - Prison Fellowship Ministries Being SuedDon't you want to be protected from religion? By the way, I would like to point out that the words "separation of church and state" is not mentioned in the Constitution of the United States. Read it for yourself!
- U.S. Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Separation of Church and State CaseThe U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday in the first separation of church and state case since John Roberts sworn in as chief justice. The case before it was brought by the Freedom From Religion Foundation,...
- Florida Senate Candidate Katherine Harris Says There is No Separation of Church an...Kathereine Harris, the woman whose ineptitude or dirty tricks gave George W. Bush the Florida electoral votes in 2000 says that separatiion of church and state in America is a myth.
- History Gives Us the Facts About Separation of Church and StateHistorical documents by Thomas Jefferson and others allow us to gain an accurate understanding of Jefferson's well known phrase "a wall of separation between church and state".
- Separation of Church and State and Public Schools Science Curriculum
- The Real Meaning of Separation of Church and State
- Separation of Church and State
- Separation of Church and State: Fact or Fiction?
- Great Misconceptions - The Separation of Church and State
- Voting Issues that Narrow the Separation of Church and State
- The Constitutional Separation of Church and State
