In Estes v. Texas, the Supreme Court overturned hte conviction of a defendant whose trial was televised to the public. The Supreme Court held that the defendant was deprived of hisi due process rights. In addition the court declared that by televising the trial, the jury was made inherently prejudicial.
The very next year the Supreme Court dealt with the same issue in Maxwell v. Sheppard. Dr. Sam Sheppard was put on trial and charged with murdering his wife. He was convicted and sentenced to many long years in prison. After serving several years behind bars, he sought a relief through habeas corpus. The Supreme Court granted the writ and released Sheppard. The Supreme Court in an 8 to 1 decision declared that Sheppard had been deprived of a fair trial becuase the judge failed to minimize "the prejudicial impact of massive publicity." Justice Clark wrote the majority opinion for the court and the only judge who dissented was Justice Black.
Prior to the 1960s there were relatively few restrictions placed on the media when it came to televising court cases. However with the ruling in Estes v. Texas and Maxwell v. Sheppard. The ruling in Sheppard gave more attention to the 6th amendment rights of the people to have a fair trial and the due process of the law.
Since then, judges are aware that the media can impact the jury members of a pending trial. As a result, judges have been giving strict orders to the jury members not to watch the news or read news magazines or speak to any of the other jury members. These measures are all taken to ensure that the defendant gets a fair trial. Juror sequestion diminshes the liklihood of prejudice of the jurors.
Published by The Outlaw
I am a student at Binghamton University interested in law. If you are looking at my Bio for spelling errors there aren't any. View profile
- Due Process Protecting Teachers RightsA look into the law and how it protects our educators. It also take a look at how it can hender the school board from applying discipline.
- Bobby Cutts Jr. Murder Trial: Will it Be a Fair Trial?For those of you not familiar with this case, it is a murder trial against a former Canton, Ohio police officer. Bobby Cutts Jr. is accused of the murder of his girlfriend, Jessie Davis and their unborn daughter, Chloe.
- The Boston Massacre & the Trial that Saved the American RevolutionThe trial of the soldiers charged with murder, in what became known as the Boston Massacre, helped to save the American Revolution before it even happened. What if things went differently? What if they did not get a...
- The Complex California Court ProcessThis article describes the court process, including trials, and appeals.
- After Five Years at Guantanamo Prison, David Hicks Will Get His TrialDavid Hicks, a 31 year-old Australian, will be formally charged within the next 30 days and will have his case come to trial soon after. He is charged with giving material support to terrorists as he fought beside al...
- Due Process of the Law - What Does it Mean?
- Procedural Due Process
- Analysis of the Crime Control and Due Process Models
- A Comparison of Procedural and Substantive Due Process
- 6 Factors that Could Prevent a Fair Trial in America
- With So Much Against Him, Can Michael Vick Get a Fair Trial?
- Americans No Longer Question Authority: Is it Too Late to Return to Due Process?




4 Comments
Post a CommentYou desperately need an editor. I found too many typo's, a word that doesn't exist, and incomplete sentences, which were distracting, therfore making it hard to enjoy your article.
You desperately need an editor. I found too many typo's, a word that doesn't exist, and incomplete sentences, which were distracting, therfore making it hard to enjoy your article.
why u gotta be so sonotyytytytyty about kim learn how to say in a nice way got it
the 14th admendment has the due process clause...not the 6th....