Should 50 Million Dollars Be Spent to Prevent People from Jumping Off the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco California?
This year, 19 people have made the choice to kill themselves by jumping off the bridge. I am sorry that 19 people have chosen the Golden Gate Bridge to kill themselves this year and I'm sorry that almost 2,000 people have died from choosing to jump off the bridge since 1937 but how can bridge officials justify the cost of 40 to 50 MILLION dollars to save a handful of people who are determined to kill themselves?
To put the 19 people who have made the choice to jump off the Golden Gate Bridge in perspective, check out these statistics: approximately 40,000 people die in car crashes each year; approximately 1,500 people die from cancer each DAY and globally one million people commit suicide each year. And to me, these statistics make 50 million dollar stainless steel suicide prevention nets seem ridiculous to save a few people who have made the choice to kill themselves by jumping off the Golden Gate Bridge.
Bridge officials say the stainless steel nets will not change the appearance of the bridge. I don't understand how bridge officials can say the suicide nets will not change the appearance of the Golden Gate Bridge. They plan on adding large twenty foot sections of stainless steel nets to a bridge that is more than a mile long and hasn't changed much since it was first built in 1937. How can that NOT change the appearance of the bridge?
Once a final environmental review has been done and officials "find" the 50 million dollars needed for the stainless steel suicide nets, the Golden Gate Bridge will be changed forever. It might be a good idea to visit San Francisco California and the Golden Gate Bridge soon and don't forget to take plenty of pictures.
Resources:
The Daily Telegraph. Suicide Net for Golden Gate Bridge. October 12, 2008.
AOL News. Golden Gate Officials Vote for Suicide Net by Sudhin Thanawala, AP. October 11, 2008.
IntelDaily.com. One Million People Commit Suicide Every Year Globally. January 31, 2008.
SanFranciscoSentinel.com. Golden Gate Bridge to Get Suicide Net by Steve Chawkins. October 10, 2008.
Wikipedia. Golden Gate Bridge.
Published by Teresa Wilson
Teresa Wilson is a California native who currently resides in the San Joaquin Valley. Teresa loves animals and enjoys writing about them, especially anything about horses. Teresa often finds herself busy w... View profile
- How to Choose a Wedding Planner in San Francisco, CaliforniaChoosing a wedding planner can be one of the most important decisions you make about your wedding. San Francisco, California has a large selection of wedding planners and choosing one out of the hundreds can quickly b...
Sights in San Francisco, CaliforniaVisiting San Francisco provides the opportunity for a great time in an excellent, well-rounded city. San Francisco is one of the more enjoyable cities to visit, and no matter wh...
The Golden Gate Bridge: A Walking Approach from the California Coastal T...An alternate approach to the seeing the Golden Gate Bridge using the California Coastal Trail along Baker Beach. This provides a more scenic view of the area that can be enjoye...
An Evening in San FranciscoSan Francisco is a city that always remains dream like in my head. If you have ever been fortunate enough to live there or spent a considerable amount of time there, you may und...
Architectural Wonders of San Francisco, CaliforniaI have just recently had a week off from work. My husband, daughter and I had decided that this year we will not take a trip; instead we stayed put and re-discovered the city ne...
- NBC's Deal or No Deal : What Would You Do With a Million Dollars?!
- Employment Staffing Agencies in San Francisco, California
- Teen Clothing Stores in San Jose, California
- Informal Wedding Dresses in San Francisco, California
- Discount Wedding Dresses in San Francisco, California
- Top Five Street Corners in San Francisco!
- Top Cooking Schools in San Francisco




2 Comments
Post a CommentWow. I hadn't heard of that. I agree with jcorn, it does seem like a suicidal person would find a way to kill themselves, regardless of if they could do it off the bridge or not. I'm sad to say that it seems like a waste of money that could be better used for programs to help people.
Good points. I tend to think that suicidal people will find a way to kill themselves, if really determined, and am not sure if the expense will change that. Also, with the economy in turmoil right now, it seems odd to spend $50 million on this....now. But that is just an instant reaction. Will the move ultimately save lives and keep people from killing themselves or could the money better be spent elsewhere, perhaps on suicide prevention programs and other ways to lower the rate of suicide? I wonder.