Friends of Kagan insist she is straight, and say she just never found the right person. Even so, that didn't stop the speculation when a picture of Kagan playing softball began circulating, which apparently led many to state as proof she is a lesbian. It's a ludicrous proposition to be sure, but the argument leads to a much deeper, fundamental question about personal privacy and expectations for public service.
Supreme Court judges, like any judge, are expected to show impartiality and an ability to rule without the influence of personal preferences. The Senate, and the American public, have a right to know if Kagan may be compromised. Unfortunately, sexual preference now plays a part in that discussion, and despite what many may say, it is not the fault of conservatives.
Gay marriage has become a political issue and a constitutional hot potato because of the push by gay activists to seek legal standing outside of accepted social and legal norms. Even though the public at large does not support the legalization of gay marriage, a number of activist judges circumvented the will of the people by providing gay marriage constitutional entitlement. Since it is likely the legalization of gay marriage will be argued before the Supreme Court, America should know if Kagan has a personal stake in the matter and if that will influence her decision.
In nearly any other instance, we have no business knowing Kagan's sexual orientation. Anyone who thinks otherwise might reconsider if the subject were one's religious beliefs or personal family secrets. However, because of the work of gay activists, the bell cannot be unrung. Gay marriage is now a legal issue because liberal homosexual activists have made it so, and now Kagan must answer.
In addition, gay activists have pushed for a lifting of the ban on the military policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," and Kagan even spoke out against the policy while at Harvard. By doing so, she opened the door to questioning her lifestyle. It's a pity, because it shouldn't be in the public arena, but the homosexual lobby has no one to blame but themselves.
Source: Examiner.com, When Liberals Attack!
Published by Victor Medina
Victor has served as a Community Voices columnist for THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS and editor of the NORTH TEXAS HIGH SCHOOL SPORTS REPORT. He has been featured in THE WALL STREET JOURNAL & several national magaz... View profile
- The Pros and Cons of Gay MarriageThis article discusses both sides of the Gay Marriage issue as well as some background, historical, and legal information.
A Respectful Dialogue Resurfaces: Gay Marriage and the Traditional FamilySome recent articles of mine on the topic of gay marriage have motivated fellow writer Becky Whittemore to offer up her views on the topic. I counter here with a thoughts on wh...- Societal Implications of Gay MarriageNowadays, homosexual mariage is on the minds of many people, including poiticians. But, at what cost are we to allow homosexual marriage? What residual effects may occur, or must we be willing to accept?
- South Africa Takes Strides with Gay Marriage Bill While United States Walks BackwardsSouth Africa recently legalized gay marriage. It just goes to show how far the United States lags behind when it comes to citizens' rights- a country that has only been a democracy for a little over a decade is alread...
Thoughts and Opinions on California's Proposition 8 Gay Marriage BanCalifornia's Proposition 8: Gay Marriage Ban. My thoughts and opinions.
- Barack Obama Appoints First Gay to Supreme Court in Elena Kagan, or Has He?
- 6 Arguments Against Gay Marriage that Don't Work
- Gay Marriage and Why This Christian Supports it
- Gay Marriage: Right or Wrong?
- Gay and Lesbian Bars in Melbourne
- Reasons Why Legalization of Gay Marriage is Right
- Maine Citizens Reject Gay Marriage Legislation, Shock Nation
- When Liberals Attack! www.whenliberalsattack.com
- Republican Examiner www.examiner.com/x-43101-Republican-Examiner




1 Comments
Post a CommentVictor, I agree with you that it is probably none of our business if Kagan was just a neighbor or a co-worker. However, because her viewpoint on this issue will set the course for our entire nation, we do have a right to know her background and opinion on this issue.