The debate over God, the Bible, and Country seems to be one that raises blood pressure and lights exuberant discussion the world over. Often the only opinions expressed are those of the faithful God fearing Christians and of those who oppose religion as a whole taking any part in society. Recently, some conservatives were appalled that a Congressman, Keith Ellison, wished to swear over a Qur'an, and called the act "psychotic", and the act of a "whacked out minority" among other ridiculous things.
I think we have embarrassed ourselves. Not every American is, or should be, a Bible fearing Christian. Thank God.
Devoted members of many peaceful religions enrich our society greatly. Sadly, the extremists get the press and the ultra conservatives go on rampages, and suddenly the world is telling us that any member of such and such point of view in the minority is the spawn of Satan (or whichever equivalent makes sense to you).
It is too bad that we tend to idolize the extremist notions in our society, when often a more middle ground approach would accomplish more and represent a greater portion of our nation's population.
Why should someone be ridiculed for wanting to swear on something that may mean to him or her what the Bible may mean to you or me? Does this not seem the most logical approach? I would not find as much importance, personally, in swearing over another strange book that meant nothing to me. Likewise, I would not imagine feeling the authority and importance of a swearing in without the Bible. As a Christian, the Bible means a great deal to me, and would signify very plainly and powerfully the importance of the act of swearing over it. Isn't this conviction what matters?
The Bible obviously maintains a prominent place in our nation's history, and that place ought to be respected. And yes, the Bible should continue to be used for swearing-in ceremonies. We should also allow, with dignity and civility, the use of the Qur'an, Torah, Book of Mormon, the four Vedas, the Bab, the Agamas, or other serious religious text that is vindictive of personal beliefs and values of the individual being sworn in. Obviously we must take serious consideration of the values of the individual in question when we cast our ballot - which is another topic in and of itself.
Published by BC
BC is pursuing a J.D. degree at an A.B.A. approved U.S. Law School. He also has a B.S. degree in Multimedia Communication Technology. View profile
- The Collective Risk Model and the Individual Risk ModelSection 32 of The Actuary's Free Study Guide for Exam 4 / Exam C discusses the collective risk model and the individual risk model and offers five problems and solutions regarding them.
- The Plight of the Inner-city DisadvantagedWilson's book, When work disappears: the world of the new urban poor, is a systematic analysis of the modern constraints on inner city African Americans.
Music of the Heart: Poison for the MindMusic of the Heart tries to draw attention to the issue of cuts in art education funding. The solution: Get the world's most famous violinists to stage a concert to raise money...- Analysis of the Book All the King's Men by Robert Penn WarrenThis research will not only summarize the novel, but will also describe the key characters, themes and concepts of the book.
- Two Portraits of the Greatest GenerationThis article examines Stud's Terkel's Coming of Age and Tom Brokaw's The Greatest Generation, comparing the two depictions of the Greatest Generation.
- Should the Bible Continue to Be Used for Swearing-in Ceremonies and in Courtrooms?
- Are Swearing-In Ceremonies Necessary ?
- Should a Swearing in Ceremony Be Used?
- Where Should the Bible Be Used?
- Securing Tickets for Barack Obama's Swearing-in Ceremony
- A First for America...The Koran Replaces the Bible at Congressional Swearing-in Oath!
- The Cult of the Individual

1 Comments
Post a CommentVery good article, makes a lot of sense. But what about atheists? Should they maybe swear on Richard Dawkins "The God delusion"? Or still on the bible? Wouldn't it be pointless for an atheist (or agnostic for that matter) to swear on the bible?