In my article, 6 Factors that Could Prevent a Fair Trial in America, I list some major flaws in the legal system that could inhibit justice. I am requesting that people review this before going on here, because it is so directly applicable and vitally important.
We actually have two considerations, in my opinion:
1. Should there be a death penalty in spite of the faults and inequities in the justice system that has resulted in an alarming number of false convictions?
2. Should there be a death penalty at all, even if the system were perfect (and would this constitute cruel and unusual punishment)?
My answer to question number one is "no," pure and simple. You can't have a death penalty until improvements are made. This would include making jurors thoroughly aware of their rights and insuring that men and women with integrity are prevalent in the legal system as lawyers and judges. I explained much of this in my article, "7 Ways to Improve the Legal System."
If everything were perfect, what about the death penalty then? On one hand, I would not want to be the one to make the determination. I say this, even though I'm far from what could be considered a "bleeding heart liberal." My views tend to differ, however, from many conservatives. As mortals, it is hard for us to determine or judge many factors about people, and I'll leave it at that.
On the other hand, I feel for the victims and their families, and that a murdered person's life meant something. There are times in the most brutal of cases when I can't help but feel sparing a savage killer would be like saying the victim's life meant nothing.
On the whole, I am in favor of tough punishments, and I am against liberals coddling criminals. I feel this is one of the foremost reasons crime continues to exist and grow. Equally as important, I tend to be an advocate of people's rights and I'm always concerned about justice.
Come to think of it, perhaps I should run for some sort of political office, as I know within myself I'm tough, but fair in all regards. I'm quite certain a lot of people agree with me and would cast their votes in my favor!
Published by Marty K.
Involved in various businesses throughout life, including iron & metal, landscape, sales in companies and freelance, business support services. View profile
Analyzing Crime and Punishment by Fyodor DostoevskyThis is a 9 page report on the novel "Crime and Punishment."- Moral Emotions in Crime and PunishmentA break down of the moral emotions used in Crime and Punishment and how it aids in character growth.
- Theme of Conflict: Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime and PunishmentCheck out one of most important themes in Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment - theme of conflict.
- Theme of "Crime and Punishment": The Problem of GuiltFyodor Dostoevsky didn't write "Crime and Punishment" to emphasize crime or the punishment, but rather, the problem of guilt despite crime and punishment.
Having a Fun Spree at the National Museum of Crime and Punishment in Was...Downtown Washington, D.C.'s National Museum of Crime and Punishment offers a great look at law and order through the ages.
- Treating Children like Children: Outlawing the Death Penalty to Preserve Innocence...
- Against the Death Penalty and Death Penalty Information
- American Court System in Shambles as Lady Justice Removes Blindfold
- Are Prisons Cruel and Unusual Punishment?
- Using Character Pairs to Structure a Novel - Crime and Punishment
- Svidrigailov in Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment
- Dostoyevski's Crime and Punishment: No Crime Takes Place in a Societal Vacuum
- Should there be a death penalty in spite of the faults and inequities in the justice system?
- Should there be a death penalty at all, even if the system were perfect?
- I would not want to be the one to make the determination, but I feel for the victims and families.
