Jeff's claims regarding church are, of course, absurd. Obciously, I have been to church and I have yet to hear a single rant. I have attended chapel at my school and still no rants. In fact, I'm not even familiar with the radio personalities Pat Robertson, John Hagee, and Janet Parshall that Musall refered to in order to prove his point. When one commentor pointed out all the good things that the church has done, Musall said that these were not the churches that were at the forefront of the Evangelical movement. Funny how I've never even heard of those how supposedly are the real leaders of Christianity. Musall even claimed that the Christian message of salvation is somehow hopeless and children should not be told that there is an all-knowing, all-loving God who endured agony we cannot even begin to imagine so that we could be svaed from eternal damnation. Apparently, this message is depressing. I'm sorry, but I don't see atheists sending millions upon millions of dollars to third-world countries.
I'm sorry, I seem to have gone off on a tangent. However, these are serious allegations and I feel that it is right that I addressed them. Anyhow, the more important question still stands: isn't this brainwashing? Wouldn't it be better if a child were allowed to wait until they were at least an adolescent before exposing them to religion, thus allowing them wait until they are ready to decide for themselves what they believe? The answer is that it is impossible to give a child an unbiased education. If a child is never exposed to the idea that there is something out there that is beyond our mortal understanding but are at the same time taught about things that can be measured and seen, then they are going to have a hard time listening to someone who tells them that there really is a God and a Creator. I'm sure there are many who would respond to this by saying that this is because there is no God and no Creator, but that is a discussion for another day.
The truth of the matter is that someone who is raised in a religious environment is actually more likely to be open to other religions and ideas. If a Christian looks at the beliefs of Islam, they are going to find many familiar ideas with which they can relate and the same is true of a Muslim who examines Christianity. If a child is exposed to the idea that there is more to this world than what we can understand, they are going to be more prepared to accept any religion, regardless of what religion they were actually exposed to. In fact, because they are also exposed to all the tough question, there is even a chance that they will become an overall unbeliever. In summary, one who has been exposed to religion as a child is more open to other beliefs than one raised in a secular environment.
In recent years, secularists have been pushing further and further into American life to try and ban faith. To any secualrists who are reading this, please, do not bother me with complaints about how this is a foundless and untrue allegation, you know as well as I do that you would just love to see every church in America burned to the ground. It is vital that we protect our freedom of religion against these people who so readily mimic the religious extremists they claim to oppose. Atheism is as much a belief as Christianity, despite what many atheists claim. It takes faith to believe that there is nothing beyond what you can see and touch and feel.Therefore, to protect our freedom of religion, it is essential that America continue to oppose those who have tried to force their faith in a great emptiness upon the rest of us.
Published by Brett Davison
My name is Brett and I was born on October 12, 1991. I'm a Christian, a history geek, a philosopher, an otaku, and a writer. View profile
- Freedom of Religion Not Always FollowedAn article about the freedom of religion and the high costs paid by some.
Freedom of Religion in America?What happened to our freedom of religion?- Freedom of Religion or Freedom from Religion?How has the separation of church and state effected American public schools? How has Supreme Court interpretations changed over time?
- Defending Thomas Jefferson - Freedom of Religion, Not Freedom from ReligionThomas Jefferson is said to be the originator of the phrase "Separation of Church and State". What did he really mean by this statement?
- Blessed or Deceived? Christian Nation, Allows "freedom of Religion, Within the RulesIs it not obvious that this country is plagued with hatred from the greatest to the least? Did we not wait in anticipation for the death of Saddam Hussein?
- Teaching Children Religion: Can Children Truly Grasp Ideas About God and the Unive...
- How Does Religion Affect the Lives of Adolescents?
- What Books Did Sarah Palin Try to Have Banned from the Wasilla Public Library?
- How to Raise Colorblind Children
- How to Homeschool on a Shoestring Budget
- Juliet B. Schor's 'Born to Buy': Prudent or Paranoid?
- Should Church Be Rated Pg-13?

5 Comments
Post a CommentGo to my church and explain--sentence by sentence--how the sermon was a rant and was somehow different from the leftist oratories you would call "speeches" and then I'll start taking their claims seriously. Until that point, I simply cannot take in the ideas you propose and and think that they somehow make any kind of sense. By the way, the right to be protected also demands the obligation to obey, so is it better that children obey their parents who are protecting them from the general dangers of the world or should they obey someone like you, who is protecting them from "brainwashing"?
While a tad misquoted, I am glad to have got a mention. One of my problems with religion is the failure to even consider that they might be wrong. You are so absolute in your misinformation that you make it impossible for your mind to consider anything but your own mythology. You did get one thing right, I don't think children should be exposed to religion. And Kim it's not persecution to demand children have the right to not be brainwashed from birth. If you don't think it's brainwashing then explain how the vast majority of children follow the religion of their societal and parental groups...and Bret, if you can't see the "rant" of the evangelical right, there is little chance I can change your mind.
Actually, I cannot believe this article has had only 2 comments (and Jeff hasn't called you "sick and evil", or some variation thereof). You did a damn good job here, saying many of the things I have always thought to a tee, but just had trouble articulating. I consider myself an adequate writer; in some genres I excel, in some I do not. Writers like you have a way of putting things in a straight-forward way that cuts through the fluff and tackles the issue without coming off as condescending or clumsy. You are right on 2 items more than any other - 1)The PARENTS have the right to raise their kids as they see fit with no interference from Big Brother, and 2) If the parents practice their Faith seriously, how could it NOT rub off on their progeny? Sorry, Jeff, but there will always be Christians on Earth, and they will teach their offspring about their Faith; like it or not!
;-)
I agree with you 100%. Those who cry the loudest about not forcing religion upon folks are the one's who want to impose the biggest restrictions upon people (and groups) who do not agree with them. Talk about persecution and closed mindedness! Great assessment.