Should the Government Disregard the Requirements of Our Constitution?

I consider it my most important mission in life to educate people on the fact that the income tax is unconstitutional and that the government is perpetrating a fraud on the people of the United States by requiring them to file 1040s and pay the income tax. Some people express the opinion that without the income tax, the government would have to shut down services like the maintenance of highways. They have swallowed the propaganda that those in the government are spreading. The cost of highways is taken out of the tax on gasoline, not the income tax. All of the income tax goes to pay the rich bankers who own the Federal Reserve. All of the necessary services of government would still be paid for if the income tax were totally abolished.

People seem to be willing to allow the government to violate our most sacred law. If we do that, then why don't we just throw our Constitution in the trash and allow those in government to rule us by whatever whims they want? Following our Constitution is not like picking items from the dinner menu. Every provision in our Constitution must be strictly adhered to or it isn't worth the papyrus that it's written on.

We could virtually eliminate the Supreme Court because there would be little for them to decide. There would be no question of the Constitutionality of anything. If any federal, state, or local government is doing something it would be perfectly legal because we would have no standard to judge their actions by. As an example, the Second Amendment is clear enough but the courts have ruled that there is no right of the people to "keep and bear arms." As to what happened at Mt. Carmel, the Branch Davidian complex in Waco, Texas, we will probably never know the truth. The government maintains that the Davidians burned the complex down themselves and that the 79 people who died including 21 children are not the government's responsibility. What was the government doing there? They were attempting to interfere in the Davidians' right to keep and bear arms. After the holocaust, there were rumors that there was child molestation going on in the compound. Can we believe that? The government fraud of declaring the 16th Amendment ratified and instituting the unconstitutional income tax on us should be proof enough that the government would spread patently false propaganda to justify their actions.

There are two types of taxes that the Constitution allows the federal government to collect. They are direct taxes, where the person or entity who owes the tax is the person or entity who must pay it to the government. The constitution requires that direct taxes be "apportioned." Apportioned means that any person or entity who is required to pay the tax must pay exactly the same amount as every other person or entity in the United States. The other type of tax is an indirect tax in which the person or entity who must pay the tax is not the person who ultimately owes the tax. The previously mentioned gasoline tax is an example of an indirect tax. The seller of the gasoline doesn't owe the tax but collects it from the buyer and pays it to the government. Even though I expect to be further prosecuted (persecuted) by the government for my attempts to educate the people that the income tax is unconstitutional, I am bound to do it, no matter the consequences, by the oath to God that I took when I entered the military. I promised God that I would support our Constitution against ALL ENEMIES. That includes federal judges and Congresspeople. The judges and Congresspeople who are aiding and abetting the fraud against us took virtually the same oath but they are dishonest hypocrites who have no intention of living up to their oath.

I sent to every member of Congress a fax on how to make the income tax Constitutional. (See my essay, "An Appeal to Congress to fix the Unconstitutional Income Tax!") A few may not have received it because their fax machines were turned off or not in use, but the vast majority of them received it. Our Constitution requires that indirect taxes be uniform. In other words, if the tax on gasoline is fifty cents a gallon it must be the same (uniform) throughout the United States. The income tax is halfway to the point of being an indirect tax. Employers are required to hold the tax out of their employees' paychecks and pay it to the government. It, however, would still be unconstitutional because it is not uniform. In other words, employees that have exactly the same amount of income must have EXACLY the same amount of tax taken out of their paychecks for it to be uniform. The only income tax that would be Constitutional would be a "flat tax." Even those who are self-employed would be required to pay the tax because, in being self-employed, they are acting as two different entities, employer and employee. As their own employer, they would be required to take the same percentage from their income as other employers take from their employees' paychecks and pay it to the government.

AS I have stated in other essays, published on AssociatedContent.com, the judiciary and the Congress are aiding and abetting the fraud that is being perpetrated against the people of the United States. Neither the judiciary nor the Congress will do anything about this gross, flagrant violation of our most sacred law. It is time that we held them to their oath. Join me and others who are on a mission to get the 16th Amendment declared what it actually is, never ratified and, therefore, "The Law That Never Was."