Should Having Children Be Something You Earn and Not a Right?
People Having Children Just to Claim Benefits Prompts Ethical Law Changes
Society today has created groups of people who have children because they are careless, as well as those who have children purely to get additional child benefits. Is our future one where being a parent might be a status that you have to earn.
This article poses an ethical question, and is written from the viewpoint of living in the UK, but it also applies for the most part to the USA as well as other countries.
Up to the last 40 years or so, most children were born to married parents, or at least parents that cared about them.
In recent years, especially in the UK, there are people who live off benefits provided by the government, and there are now whole families who do not work and just live off the state, at the expense of the taxpayer.
With increasing numbers, children in schools have no incentive to study for exams, because when they leave school, they are going to register for benefits, just like everyone else in their family.
This alone is a sad state of affairs, and one at least which the current government is trying to rectify, trying to close the loopholes that allow people to avoid working for the whole of their lives and to just live for free. Their benefits include free housing, as well as living expenses, and of course child benefits.
There are some people who have children, purely to claim benefits, and the children receive little or no love or caring from those parents, they are just left to watch television or to roam the streets, to be out of their parent's way, while they do drugs and waste their lives away.
Some women by the time they reach their mid twenties have five or more children, by as many fathers, and the government is paying everything for them.
Many of these children who have not been nurtured by their parents are disruptive at school, and suffer from emotional and behavioral problems, often due to mental defects because of their mother's abuses of drugs and alcohol while they were pregnant.
Right now, the numbers of children like this are increasing, which is of great concern to some people who are far thinking enough to consider what is going to happen in another twenty years.
Not only can any government cope with an ever increasing demand for benefits for the masses who choose not to work and to live off benefits, but the increasing numbers of children with learning difficulties, and with no concept of what it means to live in a normal society is also very worrying.
As many of us have grown older we have realized that we are very much like our parents, and we bring our children up very much like we were brought up, with many of the same standards and morals, and ideally the same or a better lifestyle.
But what of those children who have never had a normal upbringing?
These are growing up to think that it's normal to do nothing all day, to watch television, play computer games, do drugs, steal things, wander the streets, and to have children of their own without and consideration for their future.
Unless this increasing peril to society as we know it can be halted, we might be faced with a future where life is very different, and our world will be filled with an ever growing number of individuals who are virtually unaware of the need for the "normality" that is the basis for society to function.
As a result, we could be faced with a situation where society itself; begins to break down, as the numbers of those who are poorly educated, who do not work, and who are effectively misfits in society, grows to an unprecedented level.
Should we be in danger of this happening, then do we need to ask whether only those people who can satisfy certain requirements are made eligible to have children?
These would be people who can show that they are living a lifestyle which is suitable for the raising of children. That might exclude those who do not have a long term partner/spouse, who are unemployed and have never worked, almost certainly would exclude teenagers.
Does it sound like I am proposing an Orwellian type society where the government controls everything that you do, including permission to become pregnant? It's a scary thought isn't it, but what are the alternatives should the population get out of control and the numbers of the younger generations who have not been brought up correctly increase to a dangerous level?
One obvious solution in theory is to promote the need for ALL parents to educate their children in the home, not only to teach them to read and write, but to teach them about society, how to treat other people, about respect for others and their property.
It's the lack of these basic rules of life that is the foundation of many of the problems that I am trying to highlight, but just how do you educate parents who don't care, and how do you enforce it.
I really hope that this sets people thinking about the present problems that we have in our society, and the future problems that are likely to face us all if something doesn't change, and soon.
Your feedback is most welcome, and I think that you will agree that something needs doing about this NOW rather than in ten years time when it might already be too late.
This article poses an ethical question, and is written from the viewpoint of living in the UK, but it also applies for the most part to the USA as well as other countries.
Up to the last 40 years or so, most children were born to married parents, or at least parents that cared about them.
In recent years, especially in the UK, there are people who live off benefits provided by the government, and there are now whole families who do not work and just live off the state, at the expense of the taxpayer.
With increasing numbers, children in schools have no incentive to study for exams, because when they leave school, they are going to register for benefits, just like everyone else in their family.
This alone is a sad state of affairs, and one at least which the current government is trying to rectify, trying to close the loopholes that allow people to avoid working for the whole of their lives and to just live for free. Their benefits include free housing, as well as living expenses, and of course child benefits.
There are some people who have children, purely to claim benefits, and the children receive little or no love or caring from those parents, they are just left to watch television or to roam the streets, to be out of their parent's way, while they do drugs and waste their lives away.
Some women by the time they reach their mid twenties have five or more children, by as many fathers, and the government is paying everything for them.
Many of these children who have not been nurtured by their parents are disruptive at school, and suffer from emotional and behavioral problems, often due to mental defects because of their mother's abuses of drugs and alcohol while they were pregnant.
Right now, the numbers of children like this are increasing, which is of great concern to some people who are far thinking enough to consider what is going to happen in another twenty years.
Not only can any government cope with an ever increasing demand for benefits for the masses who choose not to work and to live off benefits, but the increasing numbers of children with learning difficulties, and with no concept of what it means to live in a normal society is also very worrying.
As many of us have grown older we have realized that we are very much like our parents, and we bring our children up very much like we were brought up, with many of the same standards and morals, and ideally the same or a better lifestyle.
But what of those children who have never had a normal upbringing?
These are growing up to think that it's normal to do nothing all day, to watch television, play computer games, do drugs, steal things, wander the streets, and to have children of their own without and consideration for their future.
Unless this increasing peril to society as we know it can be halted, we might be faced with a future where life is very different, and our world will be filled with an ever growing number of individuals who are virtually unaware of the need for the "normality" that is the basis for society to function.
As a result, we could be faced with a situation where society itself; begins to break down, as the numbers of those who are poorly educated, who do not work, and who are effectively misfits in society, grows to an unprecedented level.
Should we be in danger of this happening, then do we need to ask whether only those people who can satisfy certain requirements are made eligible to have children?
These would be people who can show that they are living a lifestyle which is suitable for the raising of children. That might exclude those who do not have a long term partner/spouse, who are unemployed and have never worked, almost certainly would exclude teenagers.
Does it sound like I am proposing an Orwellian type society where the government controls everything that you do, including permission to become pregnant? It's a scary thought isn't it, but what are the alternatives should the population get out of control and the numbers of the younger generations who have not been brought up correctly increase to a dangerous level?
One obvious solution in theory is to promote the need for ALL parents to educate their children in the home, not only to teach them to read and write, but to teach them about society, how to treat other people, about respect for others and their property.
It's the lack of these basic rules of life that is the foundation of many of the problems that I am trying to highlight, but just how do you educate parents who don't care, and how do you enforce it.
I really hope that this sets people thinking about the present problems that we have in our society, and the future problems that are likely to face us all if something doesn't change, and soon.
Your feedback is most welcome, and I think that you will agree that something needs doing about this NOW rather than in ten years time when it might already be too late.
Published by Tony Payne
Tony Payne is a freelance writer who lives on the South Coast of England with his wife Debbie. He has worked in the IT Industry all his life, and has been writing on various sites for the last 10 years. T... View profile
- Nadya Suleman's Mother, Angela Suleman, Says Daughter "Obsessed with Having Childr...The Whittier Daily News reports that Angela Suleman, mother of Nadya Suleman, the woman who gave birth to octopulets last week, told them that her daughter has been obsessed with having children since she was a teenag...
Having Children Lowers Breast Cancer RiskHow having children and breast feeding lowers breast cancer risks
How is Having Children Out of Wedlock a "Feel Good" Sports Story?Over the years many athletes have been poked fun of for having children out of wedlock. So why is it okay for Lebron James, Matt Leinart and Tom Brady?
- Who Knew My Life Would Change After Becoming a Parent?
- Should Corporal Punishment Be Considered Abuse?
- How Can I Watch Television on the Internet?
- FreeTube: Watch Television Online for Free
- How to Live Off of Your Unemployment Benefits
- Body Image Issues After Having Children
- 5 Ways My Life Has Changed Since Having Children




22 Comments
Post a CommentInteresting--and difficult--question.
Nicely Written, thank you
I can see where you are coming from Tony, as I saw the same thing growing up in the UK. What I find appalling though is parents who have children and then end up murdering them. Children do not ask to be brought into this world. They are innocent and need to be protected, not abused.
Sophie
Thanks so much for all the feedback. I think it's all summed up with "you can't make people care, they have to want to care". But how do you do this, and while the situation is sustainable right now, there is a big "what if" should this continue, and in 20 years time we cannot continue to fund the handling of distruptive children in the classroom, whether it's just behavioral or a mental problem. Then the cost of policing increased vandalism, theft, gangs and other violence. At some point the system could be stretched to a breaking point, and what then?
I've heard arguments for years that those on welfare should be sterilized. It's a slippery slope when governments interfere in these types of situations, but it is a problem that is growing.
I don't think society has created these people. I think people have created a society of lazy individuals who have no integrity. The thought of ALL parents home schooling their children is frightening to me. I believe in helping people who truly need help, but if you collect aid, the government should put a cap on how many children it would support and for how long. If government truly wants these individuals off welfare, offer them an alternative – education that will require of them a commitment to getting off welfare. Address their objections – provide daycare, transportation, etc. Don't give them an excuse for getting off welfare so they can stay home to raise children who will continue to collect.
It's a tough situation and many folks agree with you, while others don't. Unfortunately, you can't make people care - they have to want to care. The ones that abuse the system aren't found out until they already have more than a couple children and have been on welfare for some time. By then it's too late unless governments cut the welfare amounts if a person continues to add to their families without trying to better themselves.
I absolutely agree that this is a real problem which unless addressed is going to get worse.
I have had this discussion with many people, whether or not people should have to fit a certain profile before being deemed healthy enough to have a child.
Thanks for sharing this informative article.