Should Pets Be Tax Deductible?
Some Pet Owners Think So
Here is an excerpt from their letter:
"Once again, it's tax time and as always, we owe money to the state and federal governments because I am married with no children. My husband & I have no children because we cannot afford to have children living on Long Island. But we do have 2 dogs - 2 very expensive dogs - and they are our kids. If I should mistreat, neglect, abuse or deprive my dog of health care in any way, I can be arrested for animal cruelty. But yet, here we are, spending thousands and thousands of dollars each year giving my dogs the best care in emergency and non-emergency situations, what do we receive? My proposal is to be able to declare my dogs as dependents on my taxes at the end of the year.
"With the request of proper documentation from pet owners, I firmly believe we should propose a new law to be able to claim our dogs as dependents, whether it be for routine exams, medicines and/or emergency care. Anything would be of great assistance to pet owners."
I think they shoot themselves in their paws over the bolded statements above. "Can't afford to have children", but they spend thousands each year on the canines, giving them the best care possible? Excuse me? If it's too expensive to live on Long Island, how can their neighbors have children? How can they afford TWO expensive dogs?
The Long Island Lawyers must be literally chomping on their muzzles while waiting for this crucial legislative proposal to be enacted. Once the canine species assume privileged status as legal dependents, the activists for each animal species will demand equal rights. What about the very expensive tropical fish that require undue attention and constant care?
I predict a new form of animal class warfare will arise, pitting Dobermans against Dingos, Pomeranians against parrots, brother against sister, etc. The shark species stands to make a killing over this.
Seriously, if it's too expensive to raise dogs on Long Island, what about the dogs being raised in the backwaters of Mississippi? Should they get the same tax breaks? Perhaps a CPI should be enacted, a Canine Price Index, that would equalize the tax treatment of dogs across our fruited plains.
These people need urgent psychiatric counseling. They are obviously barking up the wrong tree on this issue.
Yeah, this is the kind of nut-case legislation that our elected representatives should tie themselves up with while the country goes to hell. Come to think of it, they probably will.
Published by Robert Douglas
Retired from the Air Force Medical Service, Vietnam Veteran, father of 2 children, grandfather of five girls, the ideal husband and a graduate of the Long Ridge Writers Group and AWAI Copywriter Courses. Fo... View profile
- Class-Action Suit Filed by Pet Owners Over Tainted FoodMenu Foods, Inc. will be defending themselves over its recent recall of dangerous pet food. Menu Foods offers its condolences to pet owners.
- Money Saving Advice for Pet OwnersPet owners learn several ways to save money.
- Websites Pet Owners Should Know AboutUseful websites for pet owners covering topics such as healthcare, social sites, dating, insurance, and travel.
- Bassetoodle Crossbreed Dog Makes a Great Family PetBassetoodles are a relatviely new crossbreed of a basset hound and a poodle. Find out if they qualify as a good family pet.
- The Responsibilities of Pet OwnersMany people, especially first-time pet owners, enter into the commitment of owning a pet without fully understanding what that means. Understand what your animal needs and what is expected from you as its caretaker.
- HAPPY Act Legislative Bill Proposes Tax Relief for Pet Owners
- Utilizing Network Marketing Tax Deductions
- An Animal Shelter in Shasta County, California Where Pets Have Another Chance
- Top 10 Tax-Saving Tips for Your Business
- Tax Deductions
- Why You Should Visit Black Pine Animal Park in Albion, Indiana
- Pet and Animal Rescues in Texas
6 Comments
Post a CommentWhile it is understandable that in some cases pet expenses should not be tax deductable, such as feeding and grooming expenses, as these are in fact "privilage" based expenses, but the case for a tax break should hold up for emergency medical attention toward pets. These can be considered necessary expenses due to the fact that in many states, even if an animal is mortally injured in an accident or fire, only a police officer is legally able to fire the weapon to put that suffering animal out of its misery. If the owners cannot afford the surgery to save the animal, or at least put it down humanely, there has to be some recourse to help that animal. As with anything in life, there can be no black or white in this issue. The shades of grey make this issue impossible to decide quickly. It is something to think about, though, given as messed up as our current tax system is right now.
Pets are great -- but you show me somewhere this law passes, and I'll show you a place where stray dogs are adopted and then neglected or even abused just to take advantage of this tax break. And where would it stop? Cats are nice, too. So are hamsters. Hey, my rat's pregnant -- that's another eight deductions! And you can get rid of a dog if you have to. If your kid causes problems, he's still yours, all yours. You have to pay for your kid's college. The dog won't get a license, or go through teen rebellion, or wear $1200 worth of diapers during his first two years of life. I could go on -- but I won't.
And, what are children? They are privileges too, and I still have to pay for their health, maintenance and support as I do my dog. A dog is part of a family, whoever has one can tell you. Pets give us "tax deductible humans" unconditional love and were a major part in the rehabilitation of many grief stricken families at the Pier in NYC during the 9/11 tragedy. There were pets that put smiles on people's faces even though they went through a horrible loss. In addition, there are many pets who are also giving the elderly in nursing homes companionship when others do not have the "privilege" to do so...so I ask you, instead of pets lingering in streets getting hit by cars, starving, being abused or ending up as road-kill because they don't have a "right", why don't we give those who do have pets the ability to ensure a better existence for the pets who care "unconditionally" towards those who require the much needed deduction?
I don't think pets are a privelege or right, but a duty. We have a responsibility to take care of animals, especially since its our fault as humans that they've overpopulated. Those who are responsible pet owners and vaccinate their pets, spay them, keep them from running off to breed in the streets, should indeed get back some of that $ they spent doing all of America a favor.
Yes, for quite a few people that I know they should be. I work with people who have no children, but they have pets and let me tell you by golly, if one of those starving children over in, well anywhere that they are starving could climb through the window and get rid of the pet and sleep in there place they would be a well cared for child. No doubt
No, pets shouldn't be tax deductble. They are a privelage not a right.