Should Roy Williams Lose His Job as Dallas Cowboys' Starting Wide Receiver?

Patricia Cook
Should Roy Williams lose his job as the starting wide receiver for the Dallas Cowboys? Should Miles Austin be named the starting wide receiver for the Dallas Cowboys? A lot of people are saying Austin should get the start after his performance against the Kansas City Chiefs in the NFL Throwback Game on Sunday. Dallas Cowboys Head Coach Wade Phillips has danced around the issue, saying that Austin will get about as many balls as he did last week, but has stopped short of naming him the starting wide receiver.

Here are some of the reasons Roy Williams should lose his position as the starter, and Miles Austin should be named the starting wide receiver for the Dallas Cowboys for the rest of the 2009 NFL season.

The Cowboys traded for Roy Williams in the middle of the 2008 NFL season, as a complement for Terrell Owens, giving up three picks in the 2009 draft, and one in the 2010 draft. Once in Dallas, Roy Williams played in 10 games, starting seven, and posted only moderate numbers: 19 receptions for 198 yards and one touchdown.

It might be said that as a backup to Terrell Owens, who is no longer with the Dallas Cowboys, that his numbers would be low. But the 2009 season thus far hasn't helped his case. Through four games, he has 11 catches for 214 yards and one touchdown.

Miles Austin, the fourth-year receiver, got his first start replacing the injured Williams. He took advantage of the opportunity, setting a new Dallas Cowboys record, catching 10 balls for 250 yards, and scoring two touchdowns.

Is great play in a single NFL game enough to give a player a starting position, taking it away from another player? It's long been said that a player shouldn't lose his starting position because of injury; and yet when that injury showcases a great talent at backup, should it be ignored?

And when the play of the injured starter has not been that impressive, should he automatically get his position back when he is ready to play? That's the case with Roy Williams, who is currently the starting wide receiver for the Dallas Cowboys.

With only 11 catches so far, several of his Dallas Cowboys teammates have bigger numbers: Tight end Jason Witten has 28 catches for 259 yards and a touchdown; Wide receiver Patrick Crayton has 15 catches for 243 yards and a touchdown; and Miles Austin has 15 catches for 331 yards and three touchdowns.

A question to ask is whether Austin can repeat his performance in subsequent games. Of course, no one knows, but that doesn't change the performance of Roy Williams, which by all accounts, has been far below expectations. The only way to know if Austin can really produce for the Dallas Cowboys is to name him the starter and give him the opportunity to prove himself-or not. Roy Williams has had his chance to prove himself, and what he's proven is that he isn't the 'playmaker' the Dallas Cowboys need.

So the answer to the question is yes. Roy Williams should lose his job as the starting wide receiver for the Dallas Cowboys.

Whether the start goes to Miles Austin, Patrick Crayton, or another Dallas Cowboys wide receiver, one thing is clear: it shouldn't go to Roy Williams. Jerry Jones and the Dallas Cowboys should admit they paid too steep a price in draft picks for Williams, and do what's best for the team, rather than try to justify the trade they made (if that's why they're still clinging to Williams).

This is NFL football. Dallas Cowboys football. The numbers that really matter should be those a player makes on the field, not how many picks you trade away to get him.

Sources:

Dallas Cowboys www.dallascowboys.com

ESPN http://sports-ak.espn.go.com/nfl

Published by Patricia Cook

Patricia Cook is a Dallas Cowboys fan living in North Texas. She loves to read, write, travel, write about her travels, hang out in nature, and take photographs. She is also the Fort Worth Parks Examiner and...   View profile

5 Comments

Post a Comment
  • srgazoo 9/21/2010

    roy williams should be benched, cut or traded. he is not going to help us win, and that is why we play the game: to win,

  • Mike J. 12/21/2009

    Now it is December how dumb does David and Swagger look now. They are typical Cowboys Kool Aid drinkers. Roy E. Williams should only be on the field when there are at least 3 WR in the offensive formation. I wonder how David feels about Roy's Good hands now? lol

  • David 10/16/2009

    so whats the point? Most of the time there will be 2 WR's on the field so what is the controversy about? just start Miles and Roy. they're both different types of Wr's. Roy is a posession guy, while Miles is a Speed guy. Roy has better hands while Miles can run the deep routes better.
    this article is horrible because it presents a problem that doesn't exist, because anyone who "watches the damn game" will tell you that crayton is the odd man out. Austin should take Crayton's spot and start next to Roy. There, problem solved. now write another article about why Garrett refuses to use Martellus Benett. or why Tashard Choice isn't getting more touches.

  • Swagger 10/13/2009

    This article is stupid why would you bench Roy Williams%3F Obviously if you were watching the game on Sunday Patrick Crayton needs to be bench. He is not a %232 receiver he%27s a %233%28slot%29 receiver. Numbers dont mean nothing its wat you produce on the field. So you trying to say Patrick Crayton is better than Roy Williams lol man write a better article next time

  • Dave Schrader 10/13/2009

    Tough issue. I think the positions should be open competition, the hottest player starts.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.