The author brought up the point that she would hope that if she were to be involved in a car accident where the car was driven by someone else, that her family would not consider suing the driver because she didn't wear her seatbelt. In a perfect world this might be the case but now days people don't think about who was right or wrong they will just be thinking about the cost of the medical bills and will be looking for someone to pay them. People could argue over their personal liberties being violated for every law we have. If we didn't have these laws in place think how much worse our world would be. There has to be laws, yes we should be able to think for ourselves and make our own judgment, but apparently that hasn't worked. Think what would happen if there were no laws regulating drinking and driving, or there were no traffic laws. Maybe someone might say they are having their personal liberties violated because they have to sit at a red light and they just don't want to .I don't consider wearing a seat belt that might protect me and my family a nuisance. I would not want to be killed in an accident and then they tell my children I could of survived had I worn a seatbelt. There have been studies done that more children are killed by adults in a car not wearing their seat belts smashing into them. What if your child said no they aren't going to sit in a car seat? Would you allow this? If you go by your opinion that it violates their personal liberty then they should be allowed to make their own choice? Out of every 100 children that are killed in a car accident that at least 80 of them would of survived had they been in a car seat with a seat belt.
As far as the smoking issues go I am not a smoker and if I am out for a night of fun at a bar or restaurant I don't want to inhale smoke .If I did I would be a smoker myself. People that try to lead a healthy life shouldn't have to be exposed to cigarette smoke if they don't want to be. I also disagree with the comment that people don't feel the need to think for themselves anymore. If this were the case then no one would break any laws because they were told not to. I obey the law and I still think for myself about every decision I make. The government has to play nanny to the world because they have a reason to do that. Apparently people don't have enough sense to act in a proper manner and need to be reminded that there are consequences for not following the rules. If the government just came out and said you could choose if you wore the seatbelt or not a lot of people would stop wearing it and there would be a huge increase in traffic related deaths. At one time I am sure they tried to allow people to decide if they wanted to wear the seat belt and to many choose not to. Once they found out how much a seat belt can save a person they came to the conclusion that there was a need for the law to make people wear them. This issue will be argued for many years to come. Anytime you tell a person they have to do something someone will not like it. There has to be laws to keep some sort of order in our lives. If it is your choice not to wear a seat belt then it's the auto insurance companies choice not to pay to fix your car, or for your medical bills. Maybe it's the choice of the life insurance company to not pay your family when you are killed in a car accident.
Published by Heather Shockney
Heather is the mom to a daughter with Autism, ADHD, ODD, Mood-D/O-NOS,obsessive compulsive tendencies, and sensory issues. We are a cyber-schooling family.She writes for a variety of online venues. If you ha... View profile
Rev. Timothy Wright's Car Accident and How the Church Can HelpReverend Timothy Wright was involved in a tragic car accident this weekend. It is one that will test the faith of his congregation. As a result, it is important that they sta...- Nick Adenhart Killed in Car CrashAngels pitcher Nick Adenhart was killed in a car wreck in Fullerton, California on Thursday morning. Allegedly, a drunk driver ran a red light and struck the silver Mitsubishi that Nick Adenhart had been sitting in as...
- In a Car Accident on Staten Island, a Driver Leaves Friend to DieThe following is a first person account of a car accident that occurred in Staten Island, NY on the 30th of September, 2007
- Should it Be the Law to Wear Your Seat Belt?Reasons why it should be your choice, not the governments to wear your seat belt. Seat belts don't always save lives.
- How One of My Family Members Died in a Car Accident like Laura Van RynI read about the Laura Van Ryn case in the newspaper and I am so sympathetic to the parents of both of the families.
- Angels Pitcher Nick Adenhart Killed in Hit-and-Run Car Accident
- Did Laura Bush Kill a Man in Texas in an Car Accident? Truth or Rumor?
- Nick Adenhart Killed in Car Accident
- Seatbelt Tips for Chest Injuries
- How to Avoid Getting Killed in a Car Accident
- Dakota Culkin, Sister of Macaulay, Killed in Car Accident
- Richard Duxworth of Wappapello, MO Dies in Single Car Accident, No Seat Belt
- Seat belts can save lives.
- There has to be laws to keep order.
- 35,000 die each year in car accidents,half could be saved by wearing a seatbelt.


39 Comments
Post a CommentHow can you say,if they would have worn a seat belt they would have been alive today.Who are you,God?Also how can you compare wearing a seatbelt to drinking and driving?Don't you know that this is a form of robbing the people.Wake up.In the name of freedom,Remember who killed Jesus,the government,nothing has changed
Look you are all idiots this article argues the law to wear a seatbelt not whether or not it saves lives. cause da it is a proven fact that seat belts do save lives. The point is that if you do not wish to wear a seatbelt and put your own life in danger then thats your choice and who the hell should be able to tell you that you must wear a seatbelt. So everyone stop whining about how a seatbelt saves lives, and by the way there are cases were seatbelts kill people also just an fyi.
Your argument is invalid. By not wearing a seatbelt you only physically hurt yourself. It is valid to compare that to murder as that harms others.
I dont think that we should have to i have lost family because they were wherein a seat belt so now like no one in our family will so i think it should be up to that person
I totally agree. Seat belts are one of the most important features in a car. 63% of all people that died in a car accident were NOT wearing their seat belts. That's terrible. Buckle up. Life didn't begin as an accident. Don't end it as one.
It sucks turning 21 in today's world. I've never had a job am about to finish a business degree with barely a pass in a community in which businesses only accept graduates with average marks of a credit or above. It doesn't look like I will be able to afford a mortgage on house or unit in the next ten years. With this recession bogeyman coming, do you wonder why I'm bitter? My life is miserable.
anachronistic*
In one line?
The current mandatory seat-belt laws enforced in many first world nations are anchrositic, draconian, just plan backward and harsh that patronise and disempower their respective populations.
Distinguishing the self-inflicted injuries or injuries that arise out of personal negligence from injuries arising just from the crash itself would be difficult but possible and it should occcur.* Citizens should be empowered with the choice, States should not be encumbered with the duty of enforcing it's members to wipe their own arses with the threat of large monetary penalties. Unless the state wants to create an anxious culture where every single person is checking themselves 24/7 in constant fear. Oh wait...
should not account for the extra injury. Determination of self-inflicted injuries or injuries that arise from personal negligence and injuries arising just from the crash itself would be difficult but possible and it should occcur.