SKINS: BBC Series Comes to MTV

Is America Ready for British Television?

Deb Martin-Webster
From Benny Hill to Doctor Who British television has been making its way to the American networks. Almost every game show or reality show now has at least one British cast member. Recently Skins a popular BBC and BBCA show was picked up by MTV. The show made its BBC premier in 2007. It involves teenage behavior with heavy sexual overtones. American television viewers as well as the news media are in debate questioning whether the content is too explicit for teen viewers and should it be tone down for general viewing.

Skins is the story of a group of British teens from Bristol who are trying to grow up and find love and happiness despite questionable parenting and teachers who more want to be friends (and lovers) rather than authority figures.

Which brings me to my lead question: Is America ready for uncensored British television shows? It's a fact that European television is more liberal than its American counterpart. Full frontal nudity of men and women and explicit sexual language is common abroad and in the UK. My husband who is British thinks it quite humorous that we place big blue dots over human body part and bleep out common obscenities like hell and damn. He said he was more offended watching America's Funniest Video of dogs dragging their butts across a carpeted floor, but I digress.

Will MTV censor and/or cut scenes, tone down the language for the American viewer? Yahoo News posted an article via the Atlantic Wire in Washington, DC of viewer opinions about MTV airing Skins. I've watched Skins and have found it to be provocative and suggestive however relatively accurate when it comes to depicting teenaged sexual angst; desperately trying to find a pecking order in their adolescent clique.

Good Morning America recently featured a story asking whether Skins has gone too far. Some go as far as calling it child pornography. I find it duplicitous that we raise our eyebrow at Skins when it is the same or less suggestive as some sexual situations I've viewed on late afternoon soap operas.

My opinion, I'm neither for nor against MTV's decision to air or not air Skins. Nor do I support excessive and explicit sexual content for the sake of ratings. As a parent and visual artist it is up to me what I expose to my children. If I don't want them to watch it - I turn it off. This gets tougher as our t'weens become teens. I am 100% in support of both teenage girls and boys embracing individual self-esteem, using good judgement and developing personal empowerment. However, what I DO NOT support [and this is an old debate for me] is the network's endorsement of arbitrary censorship of programming, be it local or cable BBC or ABC, and what they deem suitable for American viewers. What's your opinion?

Source(s):
http://news.yahoo.com/s/atlantic/20110121/cm_atlantic/toptweetsmtvsskinsedition6670
http://www.bbcamerica.com/content/328/orientation.jsp
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/controversal-mtv-skins-porn-teens/story?id=12728614

Published by Deb Martin-Webster

Originally from Pennsylvania, author/artist Deb Martin-Webster and her British husband Pete, currently live on a small farm near the Blue Ridge Mountains in North Carolina. They enjoy the simplicity of their...  View profile

7 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Diane Z. Ciatto1/21/2011

    I'm with Mike, can the violence and the rest will take care of itself!

  • Deb Martin-Webster1/21/2011

    I totally agree there is an off and on button on radios,televisions and computers. And to be honest I'm more upset about the amount of violence on primetime television. Beat the crap out of someone or blow up something no problem, but show a bare breast Ooooooooooh Family Television Council is ready to pounce. Thanks for the comments folks!

  • Rae Lynne Morvay1/21/2011

    I think it will likely fit in with many other shows that are on TV these days.

  • Richard Spall1/21/2011

    I agree with Mike. There are even some over-the-top incredibly violent promos for upcoming shows, etc. that are aired during "family hours". And I'm no prude. I swear!

  • Mike Oberg1/21/2011

    I wish the TV and movie censors were more interested in restricting the view of violence to younger audiences than they are about nudity and sexuality and language! I think it is crazy how the use of language for a real purpose as in The King's Speech garnered it an R rating when there are many PG-13 movies that have horrific violence. This is a poor message in our already too violent society!

  • Eric Hetvile1/21/2011

    If James Dobson is OK with it, I'm OK with it. Maybe he and I will watch it together.

  • Donna Cavanagh1/21/2011

    Wait, I am waiting for the Family Television Council to weigh in. LOL I say this as I say with all TV. If parents don't like it, turn it off or put a lock on the channel. Banning anything is a dangerous step to take. Great article Deb! ,

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.