Danny Boyle (Trainspotting and The Beach) may have gotten lucky on this one. Everything that went into making this film fit to a tee-from the screenplay to the cinematography to the costume design. Each character was well portrayed without overdoses of melodrama and high-end actor appeal. The story was well timed and, although fantastical, maintained its feigned sense of reality without imposing strange coincidences to tie up loose ends. The camera shots were interesting without being too David Lynch and the editing kept the film running seamlessly.
But where was the zinger? Where was that tingling sensation you get when you watch a film like Forrest Gump or recall Mel Gibson's primal scream at the end of Braveheart? Where was that magic that transforms Robin Williams into Peter Pan and breathes life back into Mr. Jingles. Maybe I'm wrong here, but did no one else get the feeling that Slumdog was missing that little bit that makes cinema more than just well organized flickering images?
Slumdog was no doubt well crafted, but for me it wasn't worth the hype. It's one of those movies that everyone talks about and everyone has seen but is quickly replaced by the next fad flick-everyone will forget about it in a year or so until one day, a long time from now, one of the herd will look up the Oscar winners of 2008 and say, "Oh yeah. I remember that one," smile, shake his head in nostalgia, and return to browsing the classics section for a better film to rent.
Directors: Danny Boyle, Loveleen Tandan (co-director)
Writers: Simon Beaufoy (screenplay), Vikas Swarup (novel)
Starring: Dev Patel, Anil Kapoor, Freida Pinto, Rajendranath Zutshi, Madhur Mittal
Overall rating: 8/10
Published by Danny Forst
I am an ambitious writer with an English BA out of the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. I recently moved to New York City and am pursuing a career in writing/editing. Feel free to contact me with any que... View profile
Slumdog Millionaire, 30 Rock Win Big at the Golden GlobesThe 66th Annual Golden Globes were held in Beverly Hills on Sunday night. Slumdog Millionaire took home four trophies and 30 Rock took home three.- Slumdog Millionaire Primed as Major Oscar ContenderWhile Quantum of Solace opens big this week, a smaller movie is premiering that may be a major player at the Oscars. Slumdog Millionaire opens to defening buzz by critics.
- Movie Review: Slumdog MillionaireAn in-depth review of Danny Boyle's newest film Slumdog Millionaire
Slumdog Millionaire"Slumdog Millionaire" is one of 2008's most memorably exuberant movies that at its heart is a love story. This one gives you believable characters that you root for and who you...- Slumdog Millionaire Leads 2009 Golden Globe WinnersThe Golden Globes finally came back, with Slumdog Millionaire continuing to win everything in its path en route to the Oscars. But there were a few surprises, such as a win for Mickey Rourke, and two for Kate Winslet.
- SlumDog Millionaire: Every Man Has His Own Destiny
- Slumdog Millionaire a Priceless Look at India with Dev Patel, Freida Pinto - Movie...
- Slumdog Millionaire: Best Movie in Years Should Sweep the Oscars
- Slumdog Millionaire and Oscars Awards 2008
- 2009 Oscars Looking More like a Slumdog Millionaire Victory Lap
- Slumdog Millionaire "Sneak Peek" Review
- Review: Slumdog Millionaire




3 Comments
Post a CommentI really viewed this movie from an entertainment perspective and it was eye opening and entertaining. That meant millions...lol. No, it is not the best movie I ever saw but, for it's time, it was different and caught much attention. That was the hype. Right? Right. Enjoyed your article.
I appreciate the criticism and I think you are partially correct. I didn't give a critical review of the movie, it was more of my own personal banter on Slumdog being overhyped. I'm trying to balance a critical evaluation of the movie with an objective overview without giving too much of the plot away. This is difficult and I will for sure try and work on it. Thanks for reading though and check back soon for another review. I'll take your words in careful consideration when writing.
This was a rather thin review that fails to say much to readers who have not seen the movie. You used a lot of big words to say very little. Not a great review. Speaking of accolades, you do quite a bit of that yourself with the article description: "a person with vast film knowledge and a strong grasp of lexical geography." How do we know you have vast film knowledge? Where is your credibility?