Long have we debated the media's influence over our lives, and long have the media players tried to convince us that they are merely providing us the facts. Fox News says, "We report, you decide." The New York Times claims, "All the news that's fit to print." (Weak if you ask me), and CNN proudly swears, "The Most Trusted Name in News". So who are we to rely on?
With the social networking boom as of late, it seems as though we're looking to ourselves for fair and balanced news. Blogger.com, Wordpress.com, and Tumblr.com have millions of people just like you and me, pounding away at their keyboards everyday, attempting to rival major news sites like MSNBC.com and CNN.com, to bring you news stories and most likely their take on it. An interesting approach considering major news networks spend a ridiculous amount of time trying to convince us that they are not giving us "their take" on stories.
Even more powerful are the social networking sites like Facebook, Myspace, and Twitter. These sites are so easy that kids could use them, and do. Posting links to political articles, videos of Obama speeches, and Tweets about current events, have turned everyone into social media reporters, whether they knew what they were doing or not. But, is this good for media as a whole? Is everyone having a voice a positive thing, or could it be damaging the quality of what we're learning to a point that could be ruining our major media outlets?
Many networks have joined the social media bandwagon and are Tweeting the top stories, posting headlines to Facebook, and broadcasting news clips on Myspace. The articles and clips seem dumbed down for for those outlets, but why? Are the people assigned to those posts dumber, or are they targeting dumber people? I think the latter is the obvious choice.
I look at today's news with an open mind. I no longer look at what I'm being told, as fact. Often I go to both CNN.com and FoxNews.com to compare stories and draw my own conclusion, but what does that say about what has happened to the mainstream media? Where are we supposed to look to for information and not influence? The web is very tempting and accessible. But, how are we to know who to trust behind the mask of web design and flash intros? I guess it's no big deal that my dog doesn't know how to fetch the paper, something I always dreamed of having as a kid. I suppose I'll just train him to setup my RSS Feeds and delete spam.
With the social networking boom as of late, it seems as though we're looking to ourselves for fair and balanced news. Blogger.com, Wordpress.com, and Tumblr.com have millions of people just like you and me, pounding away at their keyboards everyday, attempting to rival major news sites like MSNBC.com and CNN.com, to bring you news stories and most likely their take on it. An interesting approach considering major news networks spend a ridiculous amount of time trying to convince us that they are not giving us "their take" on stories.
Even more powerful are the social networking sites like Facebook, Myspace, and Twitter. These sites are so easy that kids could use them, and do. Posting links to political articles, videos of Obama speeches, and Tweets about current events, have turned everyone into social media reporters, whether they knew what they were doing or not. But, is this good for media as a whole? Is everyone having a voice a positive thing, or could it be damaging the quality of what we're learning to a point that could be ruining our major media outlets?
Many networks have joined the social media bandwagon and are Tweeting the top stories, posting headlines to Facebook, and broadcasting news clips on Myspace. The articles and clips seem dumbed down for for those outlets, but why? Are the people assigned to those posts dumber, or are they targeting dumber people? I think the latter is the obvious choice.
I look at today's news with an open mind. I no longer look at what I'm being told, as fact. Often I go to both CNN.com and FoxNews.com to compare stories and draw my own conclusion, but what does that say about what has happened to the mainstream media? Where are we supposed to look to for information and not influence? The web is very tempting and accessible. But, how are we to know who to trust behind the mask of web design and flash intros? I guess it's no big deal that my dog doesn't know how to fetch the paper, something I always dreamed of having as a kid. I suppose I'll just train him to setup my RSS Feeds and delete spam.
Published by Guy Honking in your Rear-View
The best parts of my Biography have yet to happen................................... A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends upon the character of the user. - Theodore Roosevelt View profile
Social Networking - a Good Way to Snoop on Those Who Snoop on YouSocial Networking - A good way to snoop on those who snoop on you- Social Networking: The Fastest Growing Trend on the InternetSocial Networking is a phenomena that has seen a rapid growth over the last several years. If you are not involved in one (or more) of these sites you are probably wondering, 'so what is this Social Networking thing a...
- Caution :People Used to Social Networking Through Facebook or Orkut May Soon Find...Caution :People used to social networking through Facebook or Orkut may soon find the real world "boring"
Which Social Networking Site is Best for Your Small Business?More and more small businesses are looking to social networking sites to help generate clients and recruit partners. Which one is the best for your type of business?- Business: Three Risks and Myths of Social NetworkingA business article about the risks and myths of social networking.
- Sony Mylo: The Next Social Networking Gadget
- ProfileLinker Launches and Lets Users Sync Profiles Across Social Networking Sites
- Alternative to MySpace: TagWorld Social Networking
- Social Networking Part 1 "You've Got a Life"
- Fanpop! - Newest Social Networking Site
- Social/Business Networking-ProfileJunky
- Parents Acting as the Watchdogs on Teenagers Interacting with Social Networking We...





2 Comments
Post a CommentThat last part was really funny. I think tv is so limited to little sound bites here and there and this and that. The nice thing about the internet is that you have access to an unlimited amount of information and then you have the freedom to draw your own conclusions.
You are so right, Charles. Even here at AC, we must do "social networking" to get people to look at our stuff. But more than the writing sites, I can't stand Facebook and Twitter. I joined Facebook to promote my book, but have found it to be extremely privacy-invasive. And who's got time for all that twittering? The kids today - their brains re getting fried by this stuff.