As Anne walked closer, I wondered what I'd say if she got closer. I never liked her as a representative or her campaign style, which was notoriously negative. I decided that when she got closer, I'd refuse to shake her hand, tell her I thought she was a dirty campaigner and worthless as a rep, and that I'd be voting for her opponent again this election.
When she got to me, I decided to take the high road, shaking her hand, smiling politely, and letting her go about her business.
All of this came to mind as I watched the video of the encounter between Joe Wurzelbacher and Barack Obama and subsequent interviews with 'Joe the Plumber'. Joe Wurzelbacher's attitude in these videos strikes me as the one I held for Ms. Northup, contempt for the candidate. Wurzelbacher clearly dislikes Obama's tax plan, having told Diane Sawyer on ABC News that he didn't think it was fair to tax someone more for being successful.
But what I find interesting is the inherent dishonesty in Wurzelbacher's confrontation with Barack Obama, as outlined in this Seattle Times story and others, specifically:
-The fact that he apparently isn't in a position to buy the firm he says he is going to buy
-The fact that he feels it is wrong for people to pay higher taxes on higher income when he apparently owes $1,182 in back taxes that he hasn't paid.
-The fact that Joe the Plumber is doing plumbing work but hasn't completed the work required to become a licensed plumber, which may be putting him at odds with local laws and other legitimate plumbers competing for work.
-The unlikelyhood that the company that Joe Wurzelbacher has indicated he'd like to someday purchase would reach the $250,000 threshold in net profits that Joe the Plumber is so worried about.
In short, Joe seemed more interested in demonstrating his Republican props, rather than asking Obama a legitimate question about his own situation.
What we know about Joe The Plumber's economic situation is that he's a divorced dad who made $40,000 in 2006, that he has had difficulty in paying $1,261 to a hospital (since paid) and property taxes, so he would appear not to be living in much prosperity these days. That's why I find it interesting that Joe the Plumber would characterize Obama's plan to tax lower incomes less and higher incomes more as a form of socialism. Obama's plan would, as Obama himself mentioned to Joe, lower his taxes, providing him more income both to earn money to eventually buy the business he works for and presumably pay the debt he currently owes. It also would help address the fact that tax revenue isn't keeping pace with tremendous debt, which has grown to enormous sums under Republican leadership, despite their protestations that Republicans believe in smaller government.
To me, Joe the Plumber represents the odd subset of Republican supporters whose personal reality doesn't seem to line up with their ideological views. They're angry at politicians who probably would do more to serve their financial needs because of an irrational fear that they'll be taxed to death at some faraway point where they might actually be wealthy.
Joe, a progressive income tax isn't socialism. It's the smartest way to insure that tax burdens relative to income are more fairly distributed from those at the lowest levels of incomes to those at the highest. The fact is that those in middle and lower incomes spend a much higher percentage on the basic necessities than those with higher incomes. This makes it harder for them to invest, makes them more prone to hardship when an economic downturn or inflation occurs. Would you have had as much difficulty paying taxes or that hospital bill had you been making $250,000? Would paying a higher percentage in taxes hurt you more at $250,000 than paying a lower percentage at $40,000?
In the end, I wish Joe the Plumber well. Given his demeanor, confidence in public, and grace under the public scrutiny that seems to have been a complete surprise to him, maybe he should consider a run for office himself. As was pointed out on the Daily Show, he's already done more interviews than Sarah Palin. Perhaps John McCain would be wise to replace Sarah with Joe on his ticket.
Published by Crutnacker
Freelance writer and business professional from Louisville, Kentucky. Husband, father of one beautiful daughter and three annoying cats. Lived in Maryland, Boston, MA, and Louisville, KY. View profile
Paging Joe the PlumberOhio plumber Joe Wurzelbacher became a celebrity in the October 15, 2008, U.S. Presidential debate (John McCain vs. Barack Obama). Joe the Plumber confronted Obama at an Ohio ra...- "Joe the Plumber" a.k.a. Joe Wurzelbacher Stars in Wednesday's DebateSmall business owners overwhelmingly prefer a McCain presidency to an Obama presidency.
- Joe "The Plumber" Wurzelbacher May or May Not Be Registered to Vote"Joe the Plumber" immediately became a big story at the final debate. But one of the many things pundits rushed to find out about him is whether or not he is even registered to vote.
- Joe the Plumber Does America have the heart of Joe the plumber?
"Joe the Plumber" is a Fraud; New Mascot of McCain-Palin Campaign is Not..."Joe the Plumber" Wurzelbacher is a fraud
- The Reasonable Barack Obama
- Barack Obama: Fired Up and Ready to Go
- Barack Obama Addresses Newton, Iowa, Crowd on December 30
- Barack Obama Outraises John McCain in June
- Joe the Plumber Focus of Third Debate
- John McCain, Barack Obama and the Joe the Plumber Debate
- Joe the Plumber Card: John McCain's Plumber's Crack in Logic is Showing




6 Comments
Post a CommentAnd as a former 45 year Arizonan, can also state unequivocally that McCain is a hippocrite. While Joe might be worried about Obama spreading the wealth around, there are no Joe the Plumbers in Phoenix anymore, or at least very few. McCain and his corporate developer backers have given those jobs to the day worker illegals.....so Joe won't have any wealth at all to worry about under a McCain administration.
The 16th Amendment is the biggest fraud on the American people ever. It was assumed by the founders that any anticipated amendments to the U.S. Constitution would be present to "the people" for their vote, or at the very least public hearings, at the state level. That is why the state ratification process was included to begin with - so that the most local government (the states) would place anticipated amendments before the people and would then the state legislatures would "ratify" it if the people so consented. The Federal Reserve Act was passed contrary to the Constitution (since Congress is the only entity given the authority to print and value currency) by an Act of Congress, and not an amendment, so thus it is also unconstitutional. All these amendments took place in 1913....with the Depression the result...
This is enlightening.. all the bluster about his tax bill. It turns out ....
www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/10/17/us/20091017_JOE_GRAPHIC.html
What??? Joe the Plumber is a tax dodger....We want Joe....We want Joe....We want Joe! Nicely done insights!
Cathy
I think of Joe as I do a lot of Americans - sold on policies they do not understand (this applies to many Democrats as well). We tend to subscribe to ideologies that are fed to us and that appeal to our basic sensibilities. By the end of the day yesterday Joe was telling reporters he favored Obama's policies. Is that becuase he finally took a look at them? Was it because he would look foolish continuing to support policies that really were detrimental to his personal position? Did he have an ideological change of heart? Who knows?
He's done more interviews than Palin, Crutnacker, because -- even though he belongs to a flaky third party, works without a license, and is a tax dodger -- he's not an idiot. Just listen to her speeches. If she goes off script for just a few seconds, if she gets distracted by HER OWN SUPPORTERS, if she's trying to recall the name of anything, Spare-a "Braincell" Palin just can't seem to utter a coherent sentence. Whoever labeled her Bush-in-a-skirt a couple weeks ago hit the barbie on the head...