A May launch is looking less and less likely to happen but it's not impossible. Officials say that if the tank is deemed ok for flight then the launch date may still hold. But discussion about the tanks integrity is still up in the air. The entire structure is now being inspected, but not by modern technology, but rather by hand! That's right the massive external fuel tank is being looked over inch by inch by NASA employees!
Officials at NASA say that they want to leave nothing to chance. Machines may miss a small crack in the foam, or a deformation that a human hand would have detected. It's just more of a detailed job and we want our astronauts to be as safe as possible. The enormous task is already underway, and NASA says it will make a final decision on whether it wants to repair the current tank of change it out by April 10th.
The public is not sure if money is an issue here or not, it probably is, but NASA says that whatever solution gets them to the launch pad first and safe will be the option they choose. So far with the amount of damage sustained to the orbiter, both to the main part of the Shuttle itself and what was visible to date on the external tank it would seem like a replacement tank would be the only way to go, but well just have to wait and see. If NASA does decide to replace the tank then it will cause a three month delay, pushing back the launch date to June or possibly later.
NASA has had it's share of problems in the past few years. First the tragedy with Space Shuttle Columbia, then more recently the case with Lisa Novek the rouge astronaut and then the February storms that caused the damage to the orbiter on the launch pad, as well as to many of the companies facilities. All this at a time when the public, and our own government are questioning the Space Program as a whole. Is it really worth the funds, man power and effort to continue the exploration of space?
I for one hope that the space program continues despite it's recent hardships, although I don't want their ambitions getting in the way of safety. Many people believe that the Challenger accident of 1986 was a result of a rushed launch due to media and government pressure, and I hope that NASA would have learned from this mistake. Most people would agree that the extra time it would take to replace the external fuel tank is worth it to keep everyone safe, but NASA officials are the experts and we will have to trust that they make the correct decision.
Published by Robert Guinn
I love to write and good at it. View profile
- NASA Establishes Nationwide Lunar Science InstituteNASA is looking for scientists to work for the new Nationwide Lunar Science Institute.
Reports of Halle Berry's New Music CD May Be a HoaxAre news reports of Halle Berry's foray into music an Internet Rumor Run Amok?- Cheyenne, Wyoming, Airport Shuttle Service to and from Denver International AirportCurrently, Cheyenne has two airport shuttle providers who'll take passengers to DIA. The airport shuttle services of Shamrock Airport Express and Impression Shuttle and Limousine will be discussed in this article.
All Free Credit Reports Are Not FreeNot all "Free" credit reports are free. In fact, they can be expensive. Be cautious, be smart and use the real free credit report website maintained by the FTC.- NASA's Orion - Going Backwards to Propel the US to the Moon and BeyondNASA has just awarded Alliant Techsystems Inc., the team behind the Space Shuttle's Solid Rocket Boosters, a US$1.8 bilion dollar contract to develop motors for their Orion space shuttle replacement.
- Space Shuttle Atlantis Returns to Launch Pad
- NASA Announces Engine Upgrade for Space Shuttle Atlantis
- Launch of Space Shuttle Enterprise Long Overdue
- The Passing of NASA's Space Shuttle Age
- Special Updates Leading to the Undocking of Atlantis from ISS
- How Many Computers Does it Take to Travel to Outer Space
- NASA Announces New Astronaut Hiring for Those with the Right Stuff




2 Comments
Post a CommentGreat article. The safety of the orbiter and the associated parts should be tantamount to any calls to keep to a launch date. If the safety checks are fine then I think a launch should go ahead. Safety had been pushed aside at the time of Challenger, and subsequently things changed. I think NASA needs to take a step back to the days of old when the most important thing in the minds at NASA was a commitment to the mission, not bowing to the pressures of those will forsake speed for safety.
Excellent article. I think we need to keep space exploration if safety is the number one concern. I used to think space exploration was unnecessary but it helps educate us.