Stanley Kurtz, William Ayers and Barack Obama's Attempt to Suppress Free Speech

Mark Whittington
The Barack Obama Campaign seriously does not like discussion or reporting on the relationship between their candidate and the unrepentant terrorist, William Ayers. Recently National Review columnist Stanley Kurtz found out just how the Obama people don't like it.

Stanley Kurtz was on a local radio talk show in Chicago hosted by Milt Rosenberg to discuss his research of the archives of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge where Barack Obama and William Ayers both worked. Upon hearing of the interview, the Barack Obama campaign send a mass email to its supporters urging them to flood the radio station's phone lines and send emails denouncing Stanley Kurtz and his investigation.

According to Ed Lasky at the American Thinker, there followed a circus such as host Milt Rosenberg had not seen in his thirty year career in broadcasting. There was clearly a campaign to jam the phone lines of the radio station will calls that not just disagreed with Stanley Kurtz, but demanded that he be taken off the air and his investigation stopped.

National Review's Guy Benson offered a flavor of some of the calls:

"One female caller, when pressed about what precisely she objected to, simply replied, "We just want it to stop!" Another angry caller was asked what "lies" Kurtz had told in any of his reporting on Barack Obama. The thoughtful response? "Everything he said is dishonest." The same caller later refused to get into "specifics." Another gentleman called Kurtz "the most un-American person" he'd ever heard. Several of the callers did not even know Stanley's name, most had obviously never read a sentence of his meticulous research, and more than simply read verbatim from the Obama talking points."

The Obama Campaign had been requested to send a representative to appear on the show to offer a response to Stanley Kurtz. Despite the fact that Obama Campaign headquarters was just a few blocks away from the radio station, the campaign demurred.

The Milt Rosenberg Show incident follows on the heels of attempts by the Obama Campaign to suppress an ad offered by an independent group detailing Barack Obama's relationship with William Ayers. It appears that when it comes to this issue, Barack Obama is more than willing to resort to "the Chicago way" of dealing with inconvenient opponents.

And that leads to a chilling question. What will Barack Obama do to his opponents if he were to be elected President? Democrats are attempting to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine, an archaic regulation that was done away with in the 1980s, that would have the effect of suppressing political speech from the air ways. Even without the Fairness Doctrine, past unscrupulous Presidents-Richard Nixon comes to mind-have not been shy about using the mechanism of government, the IRS, the campaign finance laws, and even the FBI to harass political opponents.

It looks like that beneath the smiles and the soaring rhetoric, we might be about to elect such a President again.

Sources: Obama campaign turns thuggish, Ed Lasky, The American Thinker, August 28th, 2008
Stanley Kurtz's Fairness Doctrine Preview, Guy Benson, National Review Media Blog, August 28th 2008
Obama Attempts to Spike William Ayers Ad, Mark R. Whittington, Associated Content, August 26th 2008

Published by Mark Whittington

Mark R. Whittington is a writer residing in Houston, Texas. He is the author of The Last Moonwalker, Children of Apollo, Dark Sanction, and Nocturne. He has written numerous articles, some for the Washington...   View profile

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Dave 9/19/2008

    I think a relevant point you missed is that the decision to have Kurtz on the radio show was made by WGN in one day. Therefore, the Obama campaign had one day to produce a representative. Moreover, this was during the Democratic National Convention, where the main spokespeople for Obama would be. Thus, I don't think the proximity of the Obama headquarters is relevant.

  • Aaron Smith 9/3/2008

    The media is certainly showing how they don't want to touch Obama since they refuse to make this an issue at all. Then we have Sarah Palin's daughter's pregnancy all over the news, doesn't this seem backwards?

  • Moeursalen 9/1/2008

    Got a little long-winded, and cut off.... Good work, I wanted to say.

  • Moeursalen 9/1/2008

    We're really living in a dangerous Orwellian media age. Instead of reporting the story and letting people decide whether Obama used good judgment in his transactions with Mrs. Rezko, in his relationship with former spiritual advisor J. Wright, and in his convenient Chicago friendship with Bill Ayers, the media becomes party to the suppression of free speech by ignoring this and many other accounts of Obama's very far left political activism and opportunism. The Wall Street Journal last week published a story by John Fund which mentioned other FOIA requests where Obama people were withholding. For example, Obama was forced by the Chicago Trib and Chicago Sun-Times to face the press to answer questions. Obama then submitted 94 pages regarding the purchase of his house in conjunction with Rezko's wife. He provided everything except for that one basic, simple, common, and most revealing document that any homeowner gets: the SETTLEMENT SHEET. Also stonewalled by the Obama campa

  • Rodney Southern 9/1/2008

    Excellent article Mark. It amazes me how this has passed over so many American voters as though it does not matter. It matters to me. Great reporting.

  • John Mario 8/29/2008

    Good article. Allow me to update it. The records of Obama as a board member were released on tuesday August 26th 2008. There is no more need to speculate on Obama's relationship with Ayers. Let the records speak for themselves.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.