The Star Trek movie is worth the wait, y'all. And more.
The new Star Trek movie is a sort of prequel to the TV series. It was directed by J.J. Abrams and stars a new, younger cast. Chris Pine plays Captain Kirk as a directionless young man from Iowa, daring and reckless even as a child. His performance is strong and confident, and he brings just enough of the old Captain Kirk from the show to slip right into his shoes with ease and grace, without becoming a caricature.
Spock is played by Zachary Quinto. He doesn't bring anything new to the table, but he does stay faithful to Leonard Nimoy's basic interpretation. Karl Urban plays Dr. McCoy (we learn how he got his nickname 'Bones') with great paranoid humor. Zoe Saldana makes a terrific Uhura, and a sort of beginning love triangle emerges between Uhura, Kirk and Spock. Fans have been speculating about the possibility of such things for years, so it's really fun to see such a possibility begin in the Star Trek movie.
Hikaru Sulu (played by John Cho) has a really great fight scene. Pavel Chekhov (played by Anton Yelchin) is how he was on the Star Trek TV show - young, earnest and adorable. Later in the movie, we come across a young engineering student named Montgomery Scott (Scotty to those who know and love him), wasting away on a remote outpost, who is swept into the Star Trek story when he finds his future suddenly catching up with him.
Kirk's Star Trek destiny begins one night in a local Iowa bar. He comes on to a beautiful Star Fleet cadet (who will only give him her last name - Uhura), and ends up in a terrible fight with some other cadets. The fight gets broken up by Captain Christopher Pike, who talks with Kirk afterwards and encourages him to join Starfleet. Pike knew Kirk's father, who gave his life to save eight hundred others, and he challenges him to do the same.
For those not Star Trek-savvy enough to know who Christopher Pike is, his name has great significance in the original Star Trek series. He was the first Captain of the Enterprise, who appears in the pilot episode of the TV show, and also in one other episode where he is elderly and catatonic in a wheelchair. At that point, Pike could only communicate through blinking lights. The Star Trek movie explains how Pike became wheelchair-bound.
For the older generation that actually watched the original shows or found them later, everything you've come to expect from Star Trek is there. The actors do an excellent job of portraying the characters. All the gimmicks you love about Star Trek are there. Spock struggles with his emotions. There's weird aliens, some semi-humanoid aliens, the crewman who dies a horrible death (and whose death you can see coming a mile away because he's the only crew member on the away team who isn't a Star Trek regular). There's the Vulcan neck pinch, and the Vulcan mind meld, which has got to be the world's coolest means of expressing the exposition in a story. Kirk shows he can take a vicious beating...over and over and over again, and keep coming back. In IMAX digital surround sound, the blows that Kirk takes in fights sound like they would turn his bones to powder.
For younger fans or people just coming to the show for the first time, the movie CGI effects are seamless and spectacular. The cast is young and attractive, witty and charming. The acting is not stilted or stylized. The story line is tight and compelling, and doesn't feel like a recycled Star Trek episode.
The only part of the new Star Trek movie that might come across as weak is the villain. A Romulan renegade named Nero, played by Eric Bana, does a sort of Captain Ahab-like obsessive revenge turn to right the perceived wrongs that had been done to him. Eric Bana's performance is menacing, but his character could probably have been rounded out a little more than it was.
Despite this potential weakness, the sheer mountain of what is otherwise great in this film completely overcomes the bad. Star Trek fans are, by nature, a very tolerant group. They've survived several movies, and multiple extensions of their favorite show, and have accepted them all with loving obsession. This movie will be welcomed by faithful Trekkies, and bring younger fans into the Star Trek universe who may not have understood the appeal before. It is my hope that this new Star Trek franchise will "live long and prosper."
Published by Dianna Zaragoza
I'm a freelance writer, editor and teacher. Most of my previous work can currently be found here at AC. I've been writing articles online for 4 years now, with a special focus on all things short in the art... View profile
- This is Not Your Father's Star Trek: A Review of the Newest Star Trek Film It's a reworking of the Star Trek canon... a new story with the old characters. J.J. Abrams brings the ancient story of an eye for an eye to the screen.
-
Why J.J. Abrams' Star Trek Feature Film Promises to Be a Blockbuster
Star Trek opens in movie theaters in May 2009. As anticipation builds, the Internet clearly shows how huge the buzz has become. Here are some facts behind what may be the bigg...
- Retro Review: Star Trek Nemesis Star Trek. When these words are uttered to any person anywhere, the majority of times, they will think of William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy and/or the conventions filled with various forms of social misfits.
- Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home - a Classic 80s Movie Review The Voyage Home offers up a lot of great scenes and deep belly laughs to trekkies and non-trekkies alike. While some of the dialogue may escape a person who has not seen the other Star Trek films, the fun is easily en...
- Star Trek Sneak Preview A look at the actors and story line of the new Star Trek movie out in theaters May 8th.
- Star Trek 2009: A Review of the New Star Trek Movie
- A Longtime Trekkie Reviews the New Star Trek Movie
- Why Did Star Trek: Enterprise Fail?
- The Ethics of Star Trek by Judy Barad
- Star Trek Movie Review
- Star Trek Science Exhibit
- How to Prepare for the New Star Trek Movie
|
|
- The characters are faithful to the original without becoming parody.
- The CGI effects are breathtaking, especially in IMAX format.
- The villain might be the only real weak spot in the movie
2 Comments
Post a CommentBoth plotlines brought me back to my senses somewhat during the movie. I guess you could look at them either way. I didn't hate either one, but the villain just didn't seem to be all that threatening. The torture things was gross, though. That made me squirm:-)
Good review. I liked the Nero villainy though-it was direct and straightforward like Khan. I thought the weakness was in the Uhura-Spock relationship.