The father played along and encouraged it. He promised them that there would be some really good bloody scenes in the movie we were about to see.
There was no discussion of good vs. evil, of the Jedi practice of using violence only as a last resort in defense against the evil empire. No, as the children were playing, it seemed that there was only the simple delight in violence for its own sake, because cutting off limbs with light sabers is "cool". The bloodier the better. That, it seems, is entertainment.
Boys will be boys, and childhood war games are considered normal and acceptable in numerous cultures across this planet. It's a testosterone thing, I suppose. But if we are going to glamorize the violence, shouldn't we at least put it into a proper context, and (unlike our Star Wars dad) teach our children a bit about the moral and ethical aspects of violence and war?
If we fail to do so, and go on glamorizing violence and encouraging mock violence in play because killing and maiming seem so cool in the movies, do we risk the possibility of raising a generation of potential sociopaths?
Does this lead to the kind of adult personality that signs up for the military so that he can go to Iraq and "kill some towelheads"?
Does it foster the kind of mindset that led American soldiers to make necklaces from the ears of slain civilians during the Vietnam War?
Does it therefore become that much easier to justify killing, or even to enjoy it?
I don't know for sure the answer to any of these questions. But I do know that, if I were the parent of a young boy, I wouldn't want to take that chance.
Not even Darth Vader would kill for the glamour of it. When he fought and killed, he did so on principle, however dark and misguided his principles may have been. He didn't draw his light saber against Obi-Wan in order to be "cool".
I encourage all parents to take their children to see the new "Star Wars" film, if they believe their children are mature enough to handle the graphic violence in it. But please don't glorify the violence for its own sake. Use the film as an opportunity to teach them the principles of right vs. wrong, and the consequences that lay along the path to the "dark side".
As Yoda once said, "Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great."
Published by Mary Shaw
Philadelphia-based writer, editor, and communications consultant. More info here: http://www.maryshawonline.com/ View profile
- Revenge of the Sith: Deep, Dark and FreudianRevenge of the Sith is darker and deeper than the other Star Wars films, with Freudian connotations, Machiavellian politics, allusions to the Godfather movies, and a doomed romance. Badly marred by poor acting, dialog...
- Jedi Trial is an Exemplary Literary Prequel to Revenge of the SithDetails about the Clone Wars - one of the biggest, yet largely unseen, elements in the Star Wars mythology - and well-developed characters are the main draw of this excellently-written Prequel Era novel.
- Revenge of the Sith: Star Wars is Part of ChildhoodGrowing up in the 1980's, it was nearly impossible not to become a Star Wars fan. Whether it was having lightsaber duels on the playground, playing with the action figures, or discussing the films ad naseum - it was a...
- Examining Revenge of the SithForget, if you can, the disappointment you probably felt with the ponderous political scheming of Episode I: The Phantom Menace or the somewhat less-than-impressive rebel-without-a-cause portrayal of Anakin Skywalker...
- Clone Wars: Volume Two Continues Bridging the Gap Between Attack of the Clones and...Although several Expanded Universe novels give a different version of some events here, Star Wars - Clone Wars: Volume Two bridges the gap between Episodes II and III entertainingly.
- James Luceno's Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader Explores the Early Days of the S...
- Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith by Matthew Stover
- Video Game Review- Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
- Revenge of the Sith: The Skinny
- Jedi Adaptation is a Fitting Conclusion to Star Wars Radio Drama Trilogy
- The Power of the Dark Side: A Look at Hasbro's Darth Vader - Dagobah Action Figure
- 'Sith' is It - Star Wars Episode III a Harrowing Tale
- Film: "Star Wars: Episode 3 - Revenge of the Sith"
- Children often play war games to mock what they see in the movies.
- Movies might cause some children to think that violence is
- Parents have a responsibility to help the children put war and violence into perspective.





6 Comments
Post a CommentIt's interesting that you mention how noble and peaceful and violence last the Jedi are, when the essential plot behind that film is the cashing in of Jedi morals for quick violence, and a corruption of otherwise accepted behavior.
(cont'd) ...the level of violence prevented my son from having his first theatrical Star Wars experience at the same age as I was in 1977. Still, I wouldn't change anything about the movie.
I think it deserves the PG-13 the MPAA gave it. My three-year-old has seen all of the Star Wars movies except for Revenge of the Sith. While I liked it a lot (my second favorite after Empire Strikes Back) I was a little disappointed that... (cont'd)
Graphic violence? My 38 year old girlfriend, the mother of two girls, went with me to see the film in advance to screen it. She couldn't understand why it got a PG-13 rating instead of PG. I then took her daughter to see it.
Timothy--quit whining, wuss.
Yes, Dominique, and those same kids who played the cowboys grew up to become Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz. Games do have an influence on psychological growth, especially when military war simulators are barely more sophisticated than Xbox games.
Kids will be kids. Do you expect a nin-year-old to grapple with the sort of philisophical debates most adult Americans can't even understand? Let them pretend to chop off arms. In my generation we played cowboys and indians. Same ol, same ol...