Last week Rafael Palmeiro, who famously emphatically denied his steroid use in front of a congressional hearing back in 2005, was left out of the hall of fame on his first ballot. Palmeiro tested positive for steroids, but denies having ever intentionally used them. Hall of Fame voters had to judge Palmeiro about his honesty, whether or not the use of steroids gave him an unfair advantage, and, finally, his performance on the field.
It seems that this is an unfair position for sports writers to be in. Rather than being required to vote on whether it was right or not that a player used steroids, they should simply be required to vote if they think the player belongs in based on his statistical achievements. At this point, Major League Baseball should simply put an asterisk next to all major league players inducted into the hall of fame who played during the "steroid era". This would not be an indictment of the players, but would simply acknowledge that this was an issue in the sport at the time. It also puts these players' careers in proper stastical perspective. It's sort of like saying "who knows?" regarding these players' place in history in comparison to players who played in other eras. For players like Greg Maddux, of whom it seems fairly obvious that he didn't use steroids, this might seem unfair to put an asterisk next to his name. However, this system would not be a way of judging Maddux or any of his contemporaries, it would simply be a way of saying that this was a known issue at the time and it would make it so that all players who deserve it statistically could get into the Hall of Fame without being convicted by the jury of public opinion.
Conversely, for a player like Maddux, it could also strengthen his career from historical perspective. It seems fairly obvious that Maddux did not use steroids. However, he was pitching against many players who were regular users, and he was still able to produce at a high level. The asterisk would remind fans how high of a level Maddux was actually playing at.
The asterisk system would allow the voters to evaluate players from their on-the-field performance only and allow many great players, who probably would have been excellent no matter what, an opportunity to get into the hall of fame, even with an*.
Published by Darren Heath
- Who Should Get Elected to the Baseball Hall of FameMLB announces Tuesday the newest members of the Hall of Fame. Here I take one voting member to task for their ballot and present how I would have voted if I had the chance I so richly deserve.
- Mark McGwire Eligible for Hall of Fame for First Time in 2007Slugger Mark McGwire becomes eligible for the Baseball Hall of Fame for the first time in 2007. But will the baseball writers opt note to vote him in because of his alleged steriod use?
- Steroid Users and the Baseball Hall of FameBaseball will lose an entire generation of its best players from the Hall of Fame if the total ban on steroid users continues. For many reasons, the ban is unjust.
- Steroids and the Baseball Hall of FameWill alleged or admitted steroid users get into the Baseball Hall of Fame? How should we make these decisions?
- Baseball Steroid Users Need Not Apply for the Hall of FameBaseball writers have slammed the door shut on steroid users. 2013 will be the year of reckoning. To continue in this hypocritical direction will be to render the Hall of Fame meaningless.
- Is it Time to Build an Alternative Baseball Cheaters Hall of Fame?
- Baseball Hall of Fame, Andre Dawson's In, Who's Next for 2011
- The Baseball Hall of Fame Ballot is Out
- Ron Santo Denied 2008 Baseball Hall of Fame; Joe Gordon Inducted
- Rickey Henderson, Jim Rice Elected to Baseball Hall of Fame in 2009 Hall of Fame V...
- Ron Santo Passed Over for Baseball Hall of Fame; Joe Gordon Elected to Hall of Fam...
- Mark McGwire and the Baseball Hall of Fame



