There are many studies that have been performed over the years by groups that are interested in finding out which people are more susceptible to voting, and which ones are not. There are certain factors that will make you more, or less, likely to vote.
Two of the prime factors in finding out who votes more often then others are economic and educational status. The higher someone's income, the more likely they are to vote. People who are considered to be in poverty status rarely ever vote.
People of the highest levels of education are more likely to vote then those who have not completed very much schooling. Almost 97% of people who have received a doctorate, vote on a regular basis.
People who live in suburban cities are more likely to vote then those who live in the inner city. People who live in the furthest rural areas rarely ever vote. People who have lived in an area for more then five years are more likely to vote then those who are newer to the area.
There are some inner city areas that look down on residents for voting. These groups state that voting is worthless, and should not be done. Members of these areas are not likely to ever vote.
Homeowners are more likely to vote then renters at almost a 3:1 margin in the United States. The larger a person's house, the more likely they are to vote. New mothers are less likely to vote then mothers that have children that are over the age of two.
People who live with other people are more likely to vote then those who live alone. The ratio for this is about 4:1.
Catholics have the highest percentage of regular voters, followed closely by those of the Jewish belief system. Members of the Evangelical religions are in the middle or the spectrum, while Buddhists are at the far end.
Business professionals are the most likely workers to vote, followed very closely by Union members. Unskilled, non-union members are the least likely to vote.
People who work in high-rise office buildings are more likely to vote then those people that work in smaller offices. The taller the building, the more likely someone is to vote.
Members of protest groups or social groups are more likely to vote then those who are not as active in their area's politics. People who are involved in social organizations are more likely to vote then those who are not.
There are many areas that are covered here. It could then be assumed that rich and powerful Catholics that have large established homes with older children are the most likely to vote (Full pun intended).
Published by L. Vincent Poupard - Featured Contributor in Arts & Entertainment and Travel
L. Vincent Poupard is known for his insightful news commentaries and unique takes on the entertainment industry. Along with his career in writing, he works as a political/business consultant and has helped b... View profile
- Are Universities Teaching Subjects that Encourage Students to Vote? The 2008 Presidential Elections are just around the corner now, as they are approximately one year away. Both parties always stress the need for a good turnout on election day. What they might not realize though is th...
- Amendment Would Allow 17 Year-olds Right to Vote A measure that would allow 17-year-olds the opportunity to vote in a primary is gaining momentum at the Connecticut State Capitol.
-
Namibians Vote November 2009 - Are You Going to Vote?
Most of the youth plan to vote in the upcoming Namibian elections, while others do not, saying they are not interested in politics.
-
Angels on the Atlantic Helps Philadelphia's Inner City Kids
Angels on the Atlantic, a non-profit organization, provides the inner city kids of Philadelphia a chance to experience a day at the beach.
- "Idiot" Amendment Likely to Pass in Iowa Other states have more exciting things to vote on this year.
- Political Bumper Stickers - Do They Make You Less Likely to Vote for a Candidate?
- What's the Secret for Getting Young People to Vote? Send Text Message Reminders
- Reason to Vote Democratic - the Supreme Court
- Why Chickens Want You to Vote
- Why You Are More Likely to Vote for the Party Than the Candidate
- The Death of Electronic Voting Machines in Prominent States: How it May Save the P...
- Is Hillary Clinton Fit to Lead? - New Studies in the Past Raise This Important Que...
|
|
- Google spies on iPhone users: Should the feds clamp down? (The Week)
- The rise of child sex-change treatments (The Week)
- U.S. Army Earns Afghan Ire by Burning Qurans (ContributorNetwork)
- America's Taser problem: 8 unfortunate Tasing incidents (The Week)
- The problem with political bloviating on China (The Week)
2 Comments
Post a CommentI agree on the apathy. People who feel "lost" see no reason to vote because inevitably it is the same old same old. When you have to choose between the lesser of 2 evils each election that boils down to not much of a choice. I think unlikely voters WOULD get out and vote if they felt the passion to do so. Hopefully they will feel that with Ron Paul.
Ha, I am the exception that proves the rules! I would suggest that the reason most people do not vote is apathy: you can not fight city hall, they are all liars and crooks, they will do what they want and do not listen to what I say I want. "1984" and Big Brother is watching you, type government has scared many people away from the polls. The study probably did not include voter fraud; fixed-elections. Enjoyed the demographics.