INTELLIGENT DEBATE

The media convention of calling the classic disagreement between creationists and scientists a "debate" has resulted in the misconception by the general public that there is actually scientific weakness in evolutionary theory.

There is no doubt we need health care reform. I don't believe we need Obama's reform.

The first major debate of the 2012 presidential election season kicked off on CNN Monday with a host of Republican hopefuls present.

Oxford University Professors Richard Dawkins debates with John Lennox, in an Evolution vs. Creation debate that addresses the most perplexing issues between both sides.

Argumentum is a revolutionary medium for online discussion and debate. Based on argumentation theory, behavioral economics, neural networks and common sense, it promises to be one of the more stimulating places to argue on the internet.

There isn't any doubt that the Presidential debates you see every four years in October is a corrupt system via the Commission for Presidential Debates. Obama and McCain need to think about that and bring the town hall debate format back there to save the country...

In a recent Internet search on the intelligent design debate I was struck by the jargon and avalanche of information from both sides. This article focuses on the simple difference between science and religion.

My thoughts of this first debate.

I feel sorry for the misguided souls that call in to shows like those of Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity and Neal Boortz with the intention of trying to make an intelligent counterpoint or change the host's mind about something.

My opinion on the debate over evolution and intelligent design in schools, and a possible solution of just teaching both.

This article relates Intelligent Design Theory to Islamophobia.

Ben Stein has given us a classic movie character, great tips on making money in the stock market and knows how to write well. But he's not a diplomat--and we need one to bring the evolution and creation sides together--as well as all the other potential sides...

Republican presidential candidates sat down with Charles Gibson for a less formal, but no less intense debate in New Hampshire.

In spite of all the evidence, there are those who persist in ignoring science and insisting Creationism or Intelligent Design should be taught in our schools.

Arguments about Intelligent Design tend to go nowhere, in part because the two sides tend to talk past, rather than to, each other. This article explains how the disagreement has nothing to do with conflict between the theories themselves.

This article describes how intelligent design has become the new face of creationism, some of its fallacies, and how it is making inroads into public education in the United States.

Intelligent design and evolution have created one of the most controversial topics in the past few years. Many conservative groups have tried to put intelligent design into the science curriculum

Hillary Clinton proved herself a formidable opponent Monday night at the Democratic debate. She demonstrated her political prowess, her knowledge of the issues and her ability to problem solve intelligently.

This paper presents an individualist ethical and political perspective in opposition to demands that Creationism or Intelligent Design be taught in the public schools. While religious discussions ought to be permitted in the schools, they must not be imposed on anyone.

The creationist camp has itself evolved into Intelligent Design, or I.D. In this article I outline its agenda for the teaching of creationism in public schools, and the phasing out of evolutionary theory from core curricula.

Tired of constant church vs. state battles? Me too.

For years and years, the debate as to the origin of human life, whether it was brought about by a creator or just by a series of coincidental, random scientific eve