Supreme Court Rules that Suspects Injured During a Police Car Chase Can't Sue for Their Injuries

Scott Kessman
In a ruling many law enforcement officials say was long overdue, The Supreme Court has ruled that suspects who lead police on high-speed and potentially dangerous car chases cannot in turn sue the police for injuries sustained as a result of the chase.

The Supreme Court made the ruling after hearing the case of Victor Harris, a teenager from Georgia who sustained serious injuries during a 2001 police car chase. Victor Harris' car was rammed by police cars in an effort to stop the vehicle, and was knocked down an embankment. Since then, Victor Harris has been rendered a quadriplegic and resides in assisted living home.

Nine Supreme Court justices saw video of the police car chase, in which Victor Harris was seen driving in excess of 100 mph, recklessly passing vehicles, driving into the oncoming traffic lane, and at one point, ramming his own car into police vehicles in an effort to escape.

At that point, police asked for permission to use reasonable force to ram Victor Harris' car in a particular way that would cause the car to spin out and hopefully, effectively end the car chase. However, due to the excessive speed of Victor Harris' car, police opted to ram the car differently, resulting in the crash that injured the Georgia teenager.

When similar cases are brought to court, the suspect is often painted as a safe driver by lawyers, and that police car chases ensue as a result of the suspect either being suitably frightened by police or other reasons attributed to anything but the suspect themselves. However, thanks to the advent of dashboard-mounted video in police cars, the court can now see the actual picture and the reckless behavior of the suspects.

After viewing the tape and hearing a description of police tactics used during a police car chase, the Supreme Court justices ruled 8-1 in favor of the police. Previous Supreme Court precedents have stated that police officers can only apply deadly force if the suspect poses a "significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others".

Various law enforcement officials have argued that giving suspects the right to sue for their injuries can seriously hinder future police car chases in which police officers would need to either determine within seconds if deadly force is required, or if they should wait further, which can result in injuries to officers or others that could have otherwise been prevented.

Published by Scott Kessman

Scott Michael Kessman is a freelance writer and also the author of The Tales of Tanglewood YA fantasy series. The novels meld together Irish & Celtic mythology with modern-day folklore, and are enjoyed by al...  View profile

3 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Tyler10/13/2010

    Cops are morons, the people who developed these tactics are morons, and the citizens who continue to support the police with their tax dollars are morons. Officers and other drivers would have never been in danger if the cops hadn't of chased the vehicle, and that boy never would have been rendered disabled for the rest of his life.. Cops need to quit endangering peoples lives by chasing criminals in cars, and they need to start following people with unmarked choppers should they run, or perhaps unmarked cars.. If you can simply identify the driver or follow them until they leave the vehicle, there never would be any high speed police chases..

    So we can build nuclear bombs and sense high tech research devices to Mars, but we can't come up with simple things like the idea I just stated? Something is wrong with humans.. please let us die out soon..

  • Wes Derby5/2/2007

    Great ruling...I realize this would require common sense, which most criminals don't have, but perhapse if they pulled over BEFORe the police had to ram them, they wouldn't get hurt.

  • Aly Adair4/30/2007

    This is a good ruling. Thanks for the information.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.