The Supreme Court made the ruling after hearing the case of Victor Harris, a teenager from Georgia who sustained serious injuries during a 2001 police car chase. Victor Harris' car was rammed by police cars in an effort to stop the vehicle, and was knocked down an embankment. Since then, Victor Harris has been rendered a quadriplegic and resides in assisted living home.
Nine Supreme Court justices saw video of the police car chase, in which Victor Harris was seen driving in excess of 100 mph, recklessly passing vehicles, driving into the oncoming traffic lane, and at one point, ramming his own car into police vehicles in an effort to escape.
At that point, police asked for permission to use reasonable force to ram Victor Harris' car in a particular way that would cause the car to spin out and hopefully, effectively end the car chase. However, due to the excessive speed of Victor Harris' car, police opted to ram the car differently, resulting in the crash that injured the Georgia teenager.
When similar cases are brought to court, the suspect is often painted as a safe driver by lawyers, and that police car chases ensue as a result of the suspect either being suitably frightened by police or other reasons attributed to anything but the suspect themselves. However, thanks to the advent of dashboard-mounted video in police cars, the court can now see the actual picture and the reckless behavior of the suspects.
After viewing the tape and hearing a description of police tactics used during a police car chase, the Supreme Court justices ruled 8-1 in favor of the police. Previous Supreme Court precedents have stated that police officers can only apply deadly force if the suspect poses a "significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others".
Various law enforcement officials have argued that giving suspects the right to sue for their injuries can seriously hinder future police car chases in which police officers would need to either determine within seconds if deadly force is required, or if they should wait further, which can result in injuries to officers or others that could have otherwise been prevented.
Published by Scott Kessman
Scott Michael Kessman is a freelance writer and also the author of The Tales of Tanglewood YA fantasy series. The novels meld together Irish & Celtic mythology with modern-day folklore, and are enjoyed by al... View profile
- Another Police Chase Leads to a Loss of Life!For years many people have often complained about the police chases that take place on busy roads and in residential areas
- Car Chase in Los Angeles: Would You Really Call it a Hot Pursuit?On Friday, February 22, 2008 LAPD chased two subjects in a dark colored SUV believed to be armed and dangerous. But, Still, Would you call it a "Hot Pursuit"? Learn my suspicions on what is going on behind the scenes...
- 2009 NFL Mock Draft #4My 4th complete 1st round NFL Mock Draft of the season
- 2009 NFL Mock Draft #3My 3rd NFL Mock Draft from 2009
- 2009 NFL Mock Draft.
- Public Opinion and the Supreme Court
- Supreme Court Appointments Key in Coming Administration
- Michigan State Supreme Court Election: Cliff Taylor Versus Donna Marie Hathaway
- Grace Period Allows New Police Officers on the Streets with Badges and Guns - but...
- The Chase is On: A Look at the History of the Car Chase Scene
- Houston Car Chase: These Eluders Can Be Crash Test Dummies!
- The Car is the Star: History of the Car Chase Scene
- Nine Supreme Court justices saw video of the police car chase
- The Supreme Court justices ruled 8-1 in favor of the police


3 Comments
Post a CommentCops are morons, the people who developed these tactics are morons, and the citizens who continue to support the police with their tax dollars are morons. Officers and other drivers would have never been in danger if the cops hadn't of chased the vehicle, and that boy never would have been rendered disabled for the rest of his life.. Cops need to quit endangering peoples lives by chasing criminals in cars, and they need to start following people with unmarked choppers should they run, or perhaps unmarked cars.. If you can simply identify the driver or follow them until they leave the vehicle, there never would be any high speed police chases..
So we can build nuclear bombs and sense high tech research devices to Mars, but we can't come up with simple things like the idea I just stated? Something is wrong with humans.. please let us die out soon..
Great ruling...I realize this would require common sense, which most criminals don't have, but perhapse if they pulled over BEFORe the police had to ram them, they wouldn't get hurt.
This is a good ruling. Thanks for the information.