Survivor Heroes Vs. Villains - And the Winner Is

Jack Aiello
The Survivor Heroes vs. Villains Sunday finale proved to be the crowning cherry on top of a fantastic, often frustrating, but always riveting season. With more unlikely double dealings and probably one of the more revelatory Final Tribal Councils I've ever witnessed, it's safe to say that Heroes vs. Villains will stand up there with the greats like Amazon, Pearl Islands, Palau and Fans vs. Favorites. For this installment, I'd like to focus less on recapping the events that lead up to Sandra's phenomenal and deserving (second!) win, and more on how and why Sandra won, why Parvati almost won and why Russell never stood a chance - for a second straight time.

Why Sandra Won
It's easy. Sandra utilized a few time honored strategies, some of which are not that impressive, but they prove time and again to be ridiculously effective. This is not to say Sandra is a boring player or without any talents. If you think Sandra is a wallflower, just watch how she threw Russell's hat in the fire - I literally laughed out loud. It wasn't the act itself, but it was the indifferent way she just casually tossed it into the fire. No, Sandra is definitely not boring. She's stealthy and sneaky, and she also knows how to tell a rich and believable lie when she has to. When it isn't necessary to make waves, Sandra possesses an innate ability to know when to step back, watch and do absolutely nothing. However, when it's time to step up, Sandra beautifully personifies the old Italian saying my mother would always utter, "Throw the Rock, then hide the hand". With Coach, Sandra did a masterful job putting him on Russell's radar without even stirring Coach's suspicion that she was responsible for his ouster.

Make no mistake, Sandra didn't always play from a secure vantage point. It was hard won. Once Boston Rob and Tyson were ousted, Sandra and Courtney were vulnerable. But Sandra kept her focus and always managed to stick around for 3 more days by employing the "as long as it's not me" strategy. When your alliance needs the numbers to stay vital, you're suddenly very needed. Even when it became a brief reality that Russell had the numbers to be voted out, Sandra was shrewd enough to switch her vote to the majority when she realized Candice was waffling between the Heroes and Villains voting block. "Tell me who you want out", Sandra asks Candice. It's brilliant. She keeps herself alive in the game without forcing anyone to do her bidding. This is a brilliant example of patience and knowing when to relinquish control when it's not in your grasp.

Sandra didn't have to make elaborate double dealings or last minute convoluted strategy shifts. Aware that cooler heads always prevail, Sandra knew to keep it simple by voting with the numbers while biding her time to find the right moment to strike. Finding the immunity idol, Sandra didn't share the information or give it away to someone else, she simply hid it and used it when she needed to cement her position in the final five. Technically, she didn't even need to use it, as Rupert got the majority of the votes, but since day 36 was the last day to play the idol, she had nothing to lose by playing it and everything to lose if she didn't.

Flying under the radar seems like the passive thing to do. Again, it's boring, but its effectiveness should never be underestimated. Sandra played this perfectly so she wasn't perceived by the jury as a major backstabber. She ultimately got the majority of the votes because of her blunt and frank demeanor. It's part of Sandra's charm that she can be lippy and outspoken without ever coming across as mean or condescending. This plays an important part to Sandra's likability among the jury. In addition, she doesn't know how to do unctuous, a tone which most jury members seem to hate and immediately sniff as false and ingratiating. She simply and forthrightly stated her facts as truthfully, honestly and forcefully as she could and jury members appreciate this mix of honest, yet compassionate arguing.

Why Parvati Almost Won
Parvati didn't go down with out a fight. She managed to snag a few key votes herself and truthfully speaking, Parvati was just as deserving of the win as Sandra. She played just as cunningly, just as fiercely, with the same intensity and focus, albeit with a slightly different execution. As I've said before, Parvati is a charmer and a flirt. She plays an incredible social game while still playing with her head. Parvati knows how to weave relationships in and outside her alliance and she most definitely used her physical attributes to facilitate this. But more than that, Parvati played to win. She proved to be amazing at the challenges and despite her mistrust of Russell, she still understood that Colby and Rupert needed to go before any of the Villains. That's strategy, not emotion. In addition, she never took herself out of immunity challenges, and she let no one mentally bully her.

The element of luck also has to be factored in with playing Survivor. Sandra, Parvati and Russell all making it to the Final 3 involved some vicissitude of the game to bring them there. If the Heroes had won more immunity challenges in the beginning, the merged tribe would have had a totally different cast. If Tyson didn't vote himself out of the game, Parvati would have been sent packing. The best laid plans can still blow up in your face, but Parvati did a great job controlling her fate in the game as much as she could. She played both a great social and physical game.

Why Russell Never Stood a Chance
Russell is indomitable in the game of Survivor. He plays with an aggressive and gleefully malevolent swagger, making big moves and bulldozing his way through to the end. Russell is Superman. Like Superman, Russell also has his Kryptonite. And it's called The Final Tribal Council. As the numbers were dwindling, Parvati and Sandra did something brazen and hilarious. They openly flouted Russell, taunted and even mocked him. In a game where you keep your real feelings about someone tamped down, Sandra and Parvati intentionally riled Russell.

"Are You with me or against me?" Russell.

"Hey, who brought Boston Rob back? 'Are you with me or against me?'. Parvati (chuckling)

"I'm against you, Russell." Sandra.

And with that, Russell was no longer calling the shots. He got schooled. Russell was making it to the Finals regardless of his game play because everyone realized he'd be a shoo-in to beat! Parvati and Sandra's message was loud and clear: "Relax, Russell, we ain't scared of you and you don't have to play the game anymore. We're going to carry you to the Finals so you can lose to us. All you gotta do is sit back and watch the jury put down either of our names because you were too stupid to realize that you made some major enemies on your way to the end."

And on some level, Russell had to realize this.

Russell has been a very controversial player since his debut in Samoa. Fans of the show either love or hate him, with no in-between. Since Samoa, many Russell apologists have argued that he's a brilliant player who got cheated out of a win. Though I admit I don't care for his TV persona, I can still state with detached logic that Russell is not the best player of Survivor. Strategize and get a good read on people all you want. Get the numbers on your side, make big moves and keep finding that idol, but if you don't bring your social game, you simply do not win. There's a human element to Survivor that if ignored, will almost certainly guarantee second place. This means you have to plunge the knife in another player's back with one hand, while you're massaging it with the other. Russell was too mean spirited in his game play and the fact that he didn't realize this until the jury members had to spell it out for him, only reveals further why Russell didn't win this game. If you don't befriend the people who make up your jury, which from the editing Russell clearly did not master, well, let's put it this way: you don't laud the football team that always gets to the end zone if they get tackled at the 1 yard line time and again.

Now if you say Russell is entertaining to watch, then I might agree. He can talk smack like no one else, does some outlandish things, which definitely doesn't make him boring, but it's not enough to make him a winner. And it's been proven. Twice.

For all my opinions and armchair observations, I comment on 3 days' worth of footage whittled down to just 43 minutes. So much more happens out there that we are not privy to. Still, it doesn't keep a fan like me from dissecting what's been a fantastic season. As this chapter closes and I await new twists and turns for the next season, I want to hear from you. Did Sandra deserve to win? Parvati? If the rumors are true about Russell signing on to compete one more time, will you think he'll change his game playing strategy to even stand a chance, or will you just vomit at the thought of a threepeat? Since this is her second win, and the only player to ever have won the game twice, does this officially qualify Sandra the best Survivor player ever?

************************************************
If you want a run-down of what happened this entire season of Survivor Heroes vs. Villains, check out my weekly recaps below.

Episode 1 - Recap - Sugar Boobs

Episode 2 - Recap - Another Hero Bites the Dust

Episode 3 - Recap - Randy gets Rooted Out

Episode 4 - Recap - I'll Have One BlindSide to Go

Episode 5 - Recap - Are You Seriously Keeping the Gimp?

Episode 7 - Recap - Robbed!

Episode 8 - The Dragonslayer is Slain

Episode 9 - Recap - Love Notes and Idol Business

Episode 11 Recap - I'll Naked Jell-O Wrestle you For that Clue

Episode 12 - Recap - The Ship is Sinking

Published by Jack Aiello

Jack hails originally from Italy and now resides in the Bronx. His articles cover a broad range of topics, but mostly Arts and Entertainment. In his spare time, he loves photography and travel, reading...  View profile

10 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Christian5/21/2010

    Fantastic write up. You hit the nail on the head on why Sandra won, why Parv would have been a great winner too, and why Russell never deserved to win, and never will win. You simply CANNOT forget the human element. Its like Russell fans just expect the Jury to forget EVERYTHING that happened, and soley vote on "gameplay". Sorry, not gonna happen. The ONLY people who have any right to speak on a Juries actions is someone who has sat on that very same Jury.

  • ElectricRaptor5/21/2010

    I think if there was a totally unbaised Jury, the vote would have been 5-4 and the winner would have been either Russell or Parvati. Parvati's dragon rider speach really sold me, and Russell's selfless risky blindside on Tyson succeeeded. Those were the key points for me this season.

  • Tony Payne5/21/2010

    I'm pleased Pavarti didn't win, she is a nasty bit of work. Great recap.

  • Derek5/20/2010

    I fully agree, I also think Jerri would have won had she made the top 3 with any of these people. She showed American that she changed as a former "preying manthy" to a strong player with smarts and way more ethics.

  • Valerie Ferrari5/18/2010

    Awesome analysis, Jack!

  • Reuben Gathright5/18/2010

    Thanks Jack. I want to watch this on Blu-Ray DVD when it comes out.

  • John Myers5/17/2010

    Once again Jack, fantastic analysis of the episode and the season. Either Sandra or Parvarti deserved the win, and I for one am happy it went to Sandra. The one thing that's not been said too much is that Russel had been the only Survivor in this season that was completely unknown to everyone else at the start of the game. Had there been another season in between, I don't even think he would have gone that far down the road, as JT, Ruppert, and all of the other heroes probably wouldn't have given him all of that pity. They never knew what we did about Russell, and that's what helped him to get that far. The way the game played out, though, was as great an ending as we could have hoped for in this excellent, but often frustrating season. As for Sandra being the best ever? Well, she's gotta be up there! Great work!

  • Jack Aiello5/17/2010

    Thanks Mario! That was a good observation about Russell actually being a vote sucker. Ha! @David - you have to cut me some slack and let me have my vices...

  • Mario Lanza5/17/2010

    Great recap! Russell didn't deserve to win, nor should he have. Sandra and Parvati both played much better games than he did, and I would have been happy with either one. In the end, the jury chose Sandra, which was the right choice.

    Honestly, Russell is such a bad player that he actually costs his own allies (Parvati) votes. She lost HvsV almost solely because she was aligned with Russell. This is how poor of a player he is. Not only does he not get votes, by hurting Parvati's chances, he actually manages to get negative votes. This is very hard to do.

    Sorry it finally had to be said, Russell fans, but Russell Hantz may honestly be the worst Survivor strategist in 20 seasons. 2 jury votes out of 18 jurors kind of backs this up.

    On a personal note, I was thrilled to see Jeff Probst finally start to come down on Russell and his ridiculous sore loser comments last night. Even Jeff can see through Russell's BS these days.

    When will America start to see through it?

  • David A. Reinstein, LCSW5/17/2010

    I admit to being in a minority - but I regard 'winning' as not watching 'reality' shows on TV... One person's entertainment is another's... well, you know ...

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.