Hundreds of thousands of dollars have been given to Planned Parenthood by Susan G. Komen in recent years, and Planned Parenthood has provided millions of breast exams and up to 70,000 mammograms over the last five years. The split between the two large organizations is unfortunate and will likely hurt many women who depend on such organizations for resources and support.
Aside from the harm to individual women by the dissolution of the relationship between Susan G. Komen and Planned Parenthood is the fact that the new policy instituted by Komen could be abused for political gain. Organizations that create rules barring them from associating with groups and organizations under investigation could trigger opportunities for partisan legislatures to muscle in on controversial nonprofits.
Basically, a partisan Congress could launch investigations of any number of organizations and nonprofits to deny them financial support from larger groups. The rule, by denying a group support upon which it has become reliant, could be considered unethical since it takes effect upon investigation, not conviction. Until Planned Parenthood has been found guilty of illegally supporting abortions it should not lose the Komen financial support it has grown accustomed to. If a firm line is not drawn insisting on convictions instead of mere investigations as the standard for removing support, countless groups could be harmed by an investigation-obsessed government or legislature.
In the public sector, due process means that employees are often guaranteed their salaries and benefits until they are found guilty of wrongdoing or incompetence. Shouldn't nonprofits like Susan G. Komen for the Cure try to maintain the same standards? Withdrawing support without following reasonable due process can lead to a slippery slope of arbitrary removal of aid for reasons, with reasons eventually become based on trivial political differences.
An organization that has reaped so much public support and goodwill should not be able to simply shut off financial support to another nonprofit without allowing reasonable due process to take its course. Susan G. Komen for the Cure has been successful because of American generosity and should therefore follow the American principle of due process.
Published by Calvin Wolf
I am a professional educator and aspiring writer, as well as a husband and father. I have lived in Texas, New Mexico, and Wyoming and have been both a professional backpacking guide and cartoonist in the pa... View profile
- Susan G. Komen for the Cure Decision a Setback for Women's Rights
- My Experience: Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure 5K in North Jersey May 15, 2011
- Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure Baton Rouge, LA
- 2010 Charleston Stingrays Annual 'Pink in the Rink' Hockey Game
- National Breast Cancer Awareness and Susan G. Komen 3-Day for the Cure: It's Your...
- Dove Promises and Foods that Support Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
- A Silver Lining Foundation Receives Grant from Komen Chicago Affiliate to Support...