Synopsis and Review of the Documentary Taxi to the Dark Side

Diane Taha
Dilawar, an Afghan taxi driver, was considered an honest and kind man by the people of his rustic village. So when he was detained by the U.S military one afternoon, after picking up three passengers, denizens wondered why. Why was this innocent man randomly chosen to be held in prison, and, especially, without trial? Five days after his arrest, Dilawar mysteriously died in his Bagram prison cell. His death came within a week of another mysterious death of a detainee at Bagram. The conclusion, with autopsy evidence, was that the former taxi driver and the detainee who passed away before him, had died due to sustained injuries inflicted at the prison by U.S. soldiers.

The torture in Bagram occurred in 2002, before the atrocity at Abu Ghraib. Thus, the Bush administration was not only aware of the inhumane treatment of detainees, most of which were innocent, but also endorsed it as a technique for attaining information. U.S. soldiers are interviewed throughout the documentary expressing regret over the torture and inhumane treatment of the detainees, nevertheless asserting that it was the top commanders who issued the practice of torture. Moreover, soldiers were pressured to acquire intelligence information which compelled them to detain the thousands of people and use inhumane strategies against them.

The torture by the soldiers on the prisoners was reminiscent of the Stanford Prison Experiment in which random volunteers took the role of either prisoner or guard which resulted in the abuse of prisoners by guards and subsequently, prisoner derangement. The conclusion was the "guards" and "prisoners" adhered to their respective definitions due human nature. One soldier who was interviewed claimed that being put in insane situations caused the soldiers to become insane and behave in a deranged manner. But whether it is in human nature to perpetrate atrocities akin to the ones at Abu Ghraib and Bagram is up for debate.

The film also emphasizes on the use of psychological torture or soft torture which is just as destructive as physical torture. First practiced by the Soviet Union, soft torture was adopted by the CIA as an effective (and surreptitious) method of getting detainees to profess any information by leaving the subject uninhibited, releasing any psychoanalytical or subconscious thoughts.

A familiar scene when watching the detainees of Guantanamo Bay is goggles, an orange jumpsuit, headphones (which serve to play repetitive vulgar messages), and a respiratory mask. This is called sensory deprivation which includes sitting in a dark, silent room void of human contact or touching anyone including oneself.

Other soft forms of torture include but are not limited sleep deprivation, forced standing for several hours in one position with arms outstretched across, and extreme heat or cool conditions. The actors and actresses of the film who reenacted the scene of Mohammed Qatani, a Guantanamo Bay detainee suspected of conspiring with the September 11 hijackers, express agony and trauma after trying to imitate the tortuous scenes as they were so psychologically impairing. Much of the scene was cut out due to being extremely disturbing.

The treatment of detainees explains why Guantanamo Bay is in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba as opposed to the United States; Cuban law would not apply, neither would U.S. law. This suggests the intention of torture prior to establishment of the prison itself.

Quite the contrary. The film denotes that torture of any kind, physical or psychological, does not serve as an effective method of interrogation. When confronted with dogs or abuse, a subject's instinct would be to blurt out any claim, regardless of its authenticity.

A "dark side" to the film is its frequent use of naked images of tortured detainees at Abu Ghraib, performing the lewd, degrading behaviors as demanded by the soldiers. Such clips last for about a minute, which, although highly disturbing, serve to enforce the film's message of the U.S. endorsement and practice of inhumanity and torture. Torture against men is exclusively depicted throughout the film with no representation of how women are treated. This may be because fewer women than men are detained. Taxi to the Dark Side is still in the process of editing, that said, only clips of the documentary have been shown as of yet. Nonetheless, what has been shown thus far suggests that the film invites a revolutionary and transformative reflection on the essence of human rights as well as the true intention of the forces behind the War on Terror.

Published by Diane Taha

Promoting change and progression.   View profile

  • Soft torture was first used by the Soviet Union and later adopted by the CIA
  • Donald Rumsfeld endorsed a number of torture practices against detainees
  • Guantanomo Bay, Cuba was a prime location inflict torture against detainees
Sensory deprivation, sleep deprivation, and forced standing are just some of the examples of non-physical, psychologically impairing methods used to interrogate detainees.

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  • dcgatewatcher 10/28/2007

    I just saw the movie and the whole premise of it seemed
    a pathetically transparent attempt to apologize for the
    `poor mislead young soldiers'. Gimme a break. Though old enoungh
    to pull a trigger , take a life and totture in the most merciless and sadistic manor the citizens of this
    country have ever seen on film, ackowledged by some as no more than an effort to alleviate boredom in other
    videos Ive seen, they not only are shameless enough to cry `victim' on camera but most without an ounce of remorse. When something as haneous as torture is concerned your only commanding officer should be your own concience. Nobody as of yet is a member of the military who did not sign up for it. That too,must
    play some role in the willingness to go along with it.

    However, as someone who is politically active here
    in Washington ,I can guarantee you that if this maniac pulls off this Iran attack the draft IS coming back.So
    I would strongly advise all from high school on into their 30`s to st

  • Rose 9/25/2007

    I attended the opening of the film at the Calgary film festival yesterday, it was very upsetting, it made me very frustrated and angry at how the US govt manages to get away with such acts and policies. I recommend it for viewing, it certainly is an eye opener.

  • Brian 4/30/2007

    Having just seen the film, it is certainly not for the faint of heart, but the reaction that "I shouldn't watch this because it makes me uncomfortable" is a bit dismaying. After all, we SHOULD feel uncomfortable/angry/upset that our country does these things. And we should demand change. To see John McCain bow down to political pressures and promises of power makes me sick. He, of anyone, should know better and we, as a public, should make sure he knows that WE know better.

  • Adhamiya 4/10/2007

    Another great film about the treatment of prisoners is "The Prisoner or: How I Planned to Kill Tony Blair".

    http://www.theprisoner.us

  • Heather Shockney 3/20/2007

    Good article, not something I would want to watch.I hate seeing treatment like that.

  • Jesse Emerson 3/18/2007

    Oh, my. Good article that makes me know that this is not something I can watch... too graphic and horrible.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.